From FAIR <[email protected]>
Subject FCC Fights First Amendment and 'Democracy Itself'
Date December 20, 2025 12:19 AM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[link removed]

FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
FCC Fights First Amendment and 'Democracy Itself' Janine Jackson ([link removed])


Variety: FCC Chairman Seems to Say That in Threatening ABC Affiliates Over Jimmy Kimmel, He Was Just Doing His Job to Uphold the ‘Public Interest’

Variety (12/17/25 ([link removed]) ): FCC chair Brendan Carr "suggested that he was simply holding broadcasters to a legally required 'public interest standard' when he...threatened ABC and its affiliates ([link removed]) if they did not 'take action' on [talk host Jimmy] Kimmel."

FAIR readers know well how the content of news is connected to its structure. Even as we see reporters doing community-serving, powerful-afflicting work, the key questions, when push comes to editorial shove, are: Who owns it? Who pays the bills?

Right-wingers have long known that. And they've known the importance of pummeling regulators into giving them whatever they want. Former RNC chair Rich Bond called it “working the refs ([link removed]) .”

Under Trumpist Brendan Carr, the FCC is, as is well known, threatening stations that deliver content they disapprove (FAIR.org, 2/26/25 ([link removed]) ), very much in violation of the First Amendment. Asked in a Senate hearing (Variety, 12/17/25 ([link removed]) ) if it's "appropriate to use your position to threaten companies that broadcast political satire,” Carr responded that "any licensee that operates on the public airwaves has a responsibility to comply with the public interest standard."

But Trump's FCC is also seeking to further loosen ownership limits and allow powerful media conglomerates to usurp more of the airwaves (CJR, 10/20/25 ([link removed]) ; FAIR.org, 10/8/25 ([link removed]) ). A filing ([link removed]) from the group Free Press calls out the expected “devastating consequences on the public’s welfare and ultimately democracy itself.”

The filing’s author, Free Press senior advisor Derek Turner (12/18/25 ([link removed] Even Bigger-,Free Press Urges the Carr FCC to Abandon Plans to,violation of the First Amendment.) ), explained:

Broadcast TV chains and their lobbyists claim that consolidation is in the public interest, arguing that mergers and acquisitions result in an increase in local news—and that local reporting declines in the absence of consolidation. This is nonsensical, and it runs counter to all available evidence.

Television broadcasters continue to do well, and brag to Wall Street that they have cornered the distinct market niche that local-TV stations serve. But those financial fortunes don’t spur greater investment in journalism. These giant companies work to slash costs after mergers—striving to maximize their profits to generate greater returns for shareholders.

Allowing allegedly local broadcast firms to acquire even more stations—in markets where they already have stations, and in new cities—will put control over news in still fewer, more corporate hands. And it will decrease the numbers of local journalists reporting on communities they actually live in.

And, not for nothing, it will increase these big conglomerates’ ability to extract monopoly rents from advertisers and pay-TV distributors.

Which is why we say: Support independent outlets with a different bottom line.
Read more ([link removed])

Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>


© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting

Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001

FAIR's Website ([link removed])

FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .

Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])

change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis