Environmental Working Group
---------------------------------------
Should the government modernize water treatment to reduce cancer risk?
[[link removed]]
Friend,
A new peer-reviewed EWG study just confirmed what we’ve long suspected: Smarter water treatment planning could prevent up to 50,000 cancer cases.
Here’s the problem: Right now, state and federal governments regulate drinking water contaminants one at a time. But our peer-reviewed analysis of more than a decade of data from over 17,000 community water systems shows that cancer-causing arsenic and chromium-6 often appear together – and can be reduced with the same proven technologies.
The science is clear: Tackling co-occurring contaminants together is the most effective, efficient way to protect public health.
The good news: Modern treatment options like ion exchange and reverse osmosis are already available – and they can also cut exposure to nitrate and other harmful pollutants.
The bad news: Outdated, one-contaminant-at-a-time rules leave communities at risk, and many existing legal standards aren't health-protective.
That’s why we’re asking:
Should the government modernize water treatment to reduce cancer risk?
[[link removed]]
Thanks for weighing in, friend.
– EWG Research Alert
Donate Now
[[link removed]]
UNSUBSCRIBE [[link removed]] | MANAGE PREFERENCES [[link removed]]
EWG
1250 I Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC xxxxxx
202-667-6982 | ewg.org
Contact Us [[link removed]] | Privacy Policy [[link removed]] | Terms & Conditions [[link removed]] | Copyright © 2025, EWG. All Rights Reserved.