View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]
** For Immediate Release: May 5, 2025
------------------------------------------------------------
** Court Warns of ‘Totalitarian’ Overreach, Declares Trump’s Blacklisting of Law Firm Illegal as Legal Challenge Broadens
------------------------------------------------------------
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Warning that President Trump’s executive order ([link removed]) retaliating against law firms, suppressing opposition and chilling lawful First Amendment activity “is a step in the direction of a totalitarian form of government,” the U.S. District Court for D.C. has ruled in favor of the Perkins Coie law firm ([link removed]) .
A broad coalition of legal and civil liberties organizations has been challenging Trump’s use of executive orders to retaliate against law firms that he perceives as political opponents. The coalition, which includes the ACLU, ACLU of DC, Cato Institute, Electronic Frontier Foundation, FIRE, the Institute for Justice, the Knight First Amendment Institute, the National Coalition Against Censorship, the Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press, the Society for the Rule of Law, and The Rutherford Institute, filed amicus briefs in a series of cases (Perkins Coie ([link removed]) , Jenner & Block ([link removed]) , WilmerHale ([link removed]) and Susman Godfrey ([link removed]) ) asking the federal courts to strike down the president’s executive orders
targeting some of the nation’s largest law firms. The coalition’s briefs challenge the president’s executive orders ([link removed]) as an unconstitutional infringement on the rights to free speech, advocacy and due process. In ruling in favor of Perkins Coie ([link removed]) , Judge Beryl Howell noted that “those who stood up in court to vindicate constitutional rights and, by so doing, served to promote the rule of law, will be the models lauded when this period of American history is written.”
“That the Trump Administration is weaponizing the government in order to wage a war against dissent, against due process, and against the very foundations of our constitutional republic should be a warning to all Americans,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “History shows that when governments claim the power to silence dissent—whether in the name of national security, border protection, or law and order—that power rarely remains limited. These threats against the legal community are just the beginning.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])
In an effort to punish a number of major law firms and discourage others from challenging the Trump Administration’s efforts to sidestep the Constitution, President Trump issued Executive Orders directing the federal government to suspend the firms’ security clearances, cease providing all goods and services, terminate any contracts with the firms and those who do business with them, limit the firms’ access to federal buildings and employees, and refrain from hiring employees of the firms.
The intent behind the president’s actions, per former advisor Steve Bannon, is to “put those law firms out of business ([link removed]) ” in response to the firms using the system of checks and balances to prevent the Administration from violating the Constitution. Additionally, the Trump Administration has used the threat of punishment from these executive orders to compel the speech and advocacy of some large firms by coercing them to agree to provide hundreds of millions of dollars worth of free legal work to serve causes and viewpoints which are favored by the administration, perhaps such as defending police officers ([link removed]) who are alleged to have violated the Constitution.
But Perkins Coie ([link removed]) , Jenner & Block, WilmerHale ([link removed]) , and Susman Godfrey ([link removed]) each challenged Trump’s Orders as being unconstitutional. The legal coalition’s amicus briefs in support of the law firms argue that the Executive Orders infringe the First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and petitioning the government.
Cecillia D. Wang, Ben Wizner, Brian Hauss, and Arthur B. Spitzer at ACLU advanced the arguments in the various amicus briefs ([link removed]) on behalf of the legal coalition.
The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, defends individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.
This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .
Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fcourt-warns-of-totalitarian-overreach-declares-trumps-blacklisting-of-law-firm-illegal Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Fcourt-warns-of-totalitarian-overreach-declares-trumps-blacklisting-of-law-firm-illegal)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])
To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]
============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
**
[email protected] (mailto:
[email protected])
THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])
Copyright © 2025 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.
Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.
** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
** update subscription preferences ([link removed])