For Immediate Release: May 5, 2025
Court Warns of ‘Totalitarian’ Overreach, Declares Trump’s Blacklisting of Law Firm Illegal as Legal Challenge Broadens
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Warning that President Trump’s executive order retaliating against law firms, suppressing opposition and chilling lawful First Amendment activity “is a step in the direction of a totalitarian form of government,” the U.S. District Court for D.C. has ruled in favor of the Perkins Coie law firm.
A broad coalition of legal and civil liberties organizations has been challenging Trump’s use of executive orders to retaliate against law firms that he perceives as political opponents. The coalition, which includes the ACLU, ACLU of DC, Cato Institute, Electronic Frontier Foundation, FIRE, the Institute for Justice, the Knight First Amendment Institute, the National Coalition Against Censorship, the Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press, the Society for the Rule of Law, and The Rutherford Institute, filed amicus briefs in a series of cases (Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, WilmerHale and Susman Godfrey) asking the federal courts to strike down the president’s executive orders targeting some of the nation’s largest law firms. The coalition’s briefs challenge the president’s executive orders as an unconstitutional infringement on the rights to free speech, advocacy and due process. In ruling in favor of Perkins Coie, Judge Beryl Howell noted that “those who stood up in court to vindicate constitutional rights and, by so doing, served to promote the rule of law, will be the models lauded when this period of American history is written.”
“That the Trump Administration is weaponizing the government in order to wage a war against dissent, against due process, and against the very foundations of our constitutional republic should be a warning to all Americans,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People. “History shows that when governments claim the power to silence dissent—whether in the name of national security, border protection, or law and order—that power rarely remains limited. These threats against the legal community are just the beginning.”
|