From Population Connection <[email protected]>
Subject We're pushing back on pronatalism in The New York Times
Date May 1, 2025 5:00 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
popconnect.org [popconnect.org] Donate [[link removed]]
Hi Friend,
I thought you might be interested in our letter to the editor [[link removed]] at the bottom of the page in today's edition of The New York Times, where we address the hysteria regarding smaller families.
Our letter contains a link to information about the recent national survey [[link removed]] we commissioned. We found that Americans have an established preference for small family sizes, and that concerns around the state of the world and finances play a big role in people’s childbearing decisions.
Incidentally, every time an opinion piece appears in the Times on the topic of population growth, readers overwhelmingly agree with our perspective that we are already overpopulated.
I certainly have no quibble with presenting all points of view on key topics. But there is a false equivalency when one side makes cogent arguments about the human and environmental costs of overpopulation while the other side complains that we might have to adjust in some way to a less-crowded planet. For some reason, the media gives far too much space to the Flat Earth types.
We will continue to make every effort to push back against this foolishness wherever it appears.
Best,
[[link removed]] John Seager
President and CEO

Population Connection
2120 L Street NW
STE 500
Washington, DC 20037
United States
If you believe you received this message in error or wish to no longer receive email from us, please unsubscribe: [link removed] .
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis