It’s Not What You Think

[ACT For America]
[[link removed]]


[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]

WHY RCV IS WRONG FOR AMERICA _AND THE WORLD_

THE VOTING METHODS used in the United States are highly decentralized
and are DESIGNED TO ENSURE THE SUPERMAJORITY CONSENSUS ELECTS
CANDIDATES in every local district.

The Rank Choice Voting (RCV) or Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) obstructs
and denies a supermajority consensus (over 50% in a district) and
intentionally allows for candidates that cater to minority groups to
move further up the ballot.

WITH THE INCREASED DISTRUST OF ELECTIONS and party selection during
primaries, RCV seems like an attractive choice that might help rank
choice a lesser known ‘grassroots’ candidate.

PARTISAN HACKING THROUGH RCV

* The Left is famous for registering as Republican (RINO)
candidates, in fact, they even coordinate to register multiple
republican candidates in some states. 
* These RINO candidates use popular talking points they pull from
local grassroots movements, promising them everything they want to
hear. 
* The Left organizes a carve out of a certain number of left-wing
activists, originally registered as democrats and independents, that
change their party affiliation and vote for their RINO republicans to
ensure bad candidates are running against strong democrats in the
general and mid-term elections. Sound familiar?  
* RCV provides the Left with further statistical advantage, allowing
them to further steer an election away from a supermajority by
flooding the ballot and organizing the votes cast on those ballots to
create a predetermined outcome.

CONSERVATIVES DO NOT THINK THE WAY LEFTISTS THINK.

WE WOULD NEVER DREAM OF GAMING AN ELECTION.

THE LAST THING OUR COUNTRY NEEDS is a change in voting method that
further enables political gaming, allowing a fringe or radical
minority block to _WIN BY DEFAULT_.

WE HAVE PROVEN THAT GRASSROOTS CHOICE CANDIDATES CAN WIN ELECTIONS. We
do not need RCV to level the playing the field, and as demonstrated,
RCV does the exact opposite.

OUR FOUNDING FATHERS EXPLORED AND DEBATED RANK CHOICE VOTING, known by
many names in the 1700’s, and ultimately determined this was a
deeply flawed and inferior voting method that would not reflect a
supermajority (over 50%) of the people in a district. 

CONDORCET’S FAMOUS ‘PRACTICAL METHOD’ is widely used around the
world, originally developed in the late 1700’s which, by design,
reflects the general will of the people and PROTECTS AGAINST THE
“MINORITY SEEKING PETTY SELF-INTEREST AND ARBITRARY PREFERENCES”.

THE PRACTICAL METHOD influenced the majority and supermajority vote
requirements used in the House and Senate today. This same method and
principles are applied to our federal, state, and local elections,
_which has only been challenged in recent history_.

MAINE VOTED TO CHANGE THEIR VOTING METHOD IN 2016 AND ALASKA BEGAN
STATEWIDE RCV BEGINNING IN 2020, coinciding with the rise of the
Democratic Socialist movement, organizing to transform our government
to Socialism from our Constitutional Republic. NOW THIS RECENT
EXPERIMENT HAS LED TO 23 STATES PUSHING FOR RCV at the top of this
year, simultaneously, and 4 states pushing for an absolute
prohibition.

RCV IS ONLY USED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM and only used in lower house
elections and small municipalities.  

RCV IS INTRINSICALLY TIED TO EFFORTS TO DEFEND THE USE OF VOTING
MACHINES FOR LIFE!

THE TRUTH IS THAT THE LEFT IS USING RCV TO DEFEND AGAINST THE WILDLY
POPULAR MOVEMENT TO BAN ALL VOTING MACHINES.

RANK CHOICE VOTING AND INSTANT RUN-OFF ELECTIONS FORCE complete
dependency on voting technology and increase loss of election
transparency!  

RANK CHOICE VOTING FORCES STATES TO REMAIN RELIANT ON VOTING MACHINES,
BALLOT SCANNERS (TABULATORS), AND ADDITIONAL CODING to calculate the
ranked choice results. Transparent elections require untrained
citizens to easily audit election results, including the ability to
read and interpret computer coding, which is completely impossible in
an election utilizing voting machines and technology. THIS FURTHER
REMOVES PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY, GIVING POWER OF ELECTIONS TO OPERATORS
AND VOTING MACHINE SUPPLIERS.

HAND COUNT ELECTION AUDITS WOULD BE NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE and require far
more man hours and costs which will discourage lawmakers and judges
from ordering audits when election results are in question.  

RCV RANK CHOICE VOTING IS PROMOTED BY LEFTISTS AND MODERATE
CONSERVATIVES as an attempt to eliminate runoff elections which,
otherwise, force the People to hear out the two finalists in a race
and make an informed decision between only two candidates.

ACT FOR AMERICA HAS ORGANIZED NEARLY 3 MILLION ACTIONS calling on
states to ban all voting machines at the national and state level. THE
STATE LEGISLATURE IN ALABAMA AND ARIZONA HAVE HEARD YOU and introduced
new legislation that is progressing through their legislature!

[No Rank Choice Voting]
[[link removed]]


[ACT NOW, Click Here]
[[link removed]]


 

[Ban All Voting Machines by 2024]
[[link removed]]


[ACT NOW, Click Here]
[[link removed]]


 

[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


_ACT for America Education, a 501(c)(3) organization._
_All donations are tax-deductible._

869 Lynnhaven Pkwy, 113 #411
Virginia Beach, VA 23452 USA

Contribute
[[link removed]]
| Charity Navigator
[[link removed]]
| Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]
 

[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]