Worldwide Police State Planned!

[ACT For America]
[[link removed]]


[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]

ALERT! THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION IS AT IT AGAIN, PREPARING TO SIGN AWAY
US SOVEREIGNTY TO THE WHO ON FEBRUARY 27TH!

WE CANNOT ALLOW A FASCIST, WORLDWIDE MEDICAL POLICE STATE CONTROLLED
BY THE WHO TO BE ESTABLISHED!

[Defund and Exit the WHO]
[[link removed]]


[ACTNOW, Click Here]
[[link removed]]


 

BIDEN ADMIN NEGOTIATES DEAL TO GIVE WHO AUTHORITY OVER US PANDEMIC
POLICIES

_New international health accord avoids necessary Senate approval._

Epoch Times | Kevin Stocklin | February 20, 2023 | Condensed

THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION IS PREPARING TO SIGN UP THE UNITED STATES TO
A “LEGALLY BINDING” ACCORD WITH THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
(WHO) THAT WOULD GIVE THIS GENEVA-BASED UN SUBSIDIARY THE AUTHORITY TO
DICTATE AMERICA’S POLICIES DURING A PANDEMIC.

THESE DISCUSSIONS AND OTHERS SPAWNED THE “ZERO DRAFT” OF A
PANDEMIC TREATY, published on Feb. 1, which now seeks ratification by
all 194 WHO member states. A meeting of the WHO’s Intergovernmental
Negotiating Body (INB) is SCHEDULED FOR FEB. 27 to work out the final
terms, which all members will then sign.

WRITTEN UNDER THE BANNER OF “THE WORLD TOGETHER EQUITABLY,” THE
ZERO DRAFT GRANTS THE WHO THE POWER TO DECLARE AND MANAGE A GLOBAL
PANDEMIC EMERGENCY. ONCE A HEALTH EMERGENCY IS DECLARED, ALL
SIGNATORIES, _INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES_, WOULD SUBMIT TO THE
AUTHORITY OF THE WHO REGARDING TREATMENTS, GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS SUCH
AS LOCKDOWNS AND VACCINE MANDATES, GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAINS, AND
MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE OF POPULATIONS.

CENTRALIZED PANDEMIC RESPONSE

“THEY WANT TO SEE A CENTRALIZED, VACCINE-AND-MEDICATION-BASED
RESPONSE, AND A VERY RESTRICTIVE RESPONSE IN TERMS OF CONTROLLING
POPULATIONS,” David Bell, a public health physician and former WHO
staffer specializing in epidemic policy. “They get to decide what is
a health emergency, and they are putting in place a surveillance
mechanism that will ensure that there are potential emergencies to
declare.”

THE WHO PANDEMIC TREATY IS PART OF A TWO-TRACK EFFORT, COINCIDING WITH
AN INITIATIVE BY THE WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY (WHA) TO CREATE NEW GLOBAL
PANDEMIC REGULATIONS THAT WOULD ALSO SUPERSEDE THE LAWS OF MEMBER
STATES.

The WHA is the rule-making body of the WHO, comprised of
representatives from the member states. “BOTH [INITIATIVES] ARE
FATALLY DANGEROUS,” Francis Boyle, professor of international law at
Illinois University. “EITHER ONE OR BOTH WOULD SET UP A WORLDWIDE
MEDICAL POLICE STATE UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE WHO, and in particular
WHO Director-General Tedros. If either one or both of these go
through, Tedros or his successor will be able to issue orders that
will go all the way down the pipe to your primary care physicians.”

Physician Meryl Nass told The Epoch Times: “IF THESE RULES GO
THROUGH AS CURRENTLY DRAFTED, I, AS A DOCTOR, WILL BE TOLD WHAT I AM
ALLOWED TO GIVE A PATIENT AND WHAT I AM PROHIBITED FROM GIVING A
PATIENT WHENEVER THE WHO DECLARES A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY. So they
can tell you you’re getting remdesivir, but you can’t have
hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. What they’re also saying is they
believe in equity, which means everybody in the world gets vaccinated,
whether or not you need it, whether or not you’re already immune.”
MANDATE FREEDOM HERE>>!
[[link removed]]

Regarding medical treatments, the accord would require member nations
to “monitor and regulate against substandard and falsified
pandemic-related products.” Based on previous WHO and Biden
administration policy, this would likely include forcing populations
to take newly-developed vaccines while preventing doctors from
prescribing non-vaccine treatments or medicines.

CIRCUMVENTING AMERICA’S CONSTITUTION

A KEY QUESTION SURROUNDING THE ACCORD IS WHETHER THE BIDEN
ADMINISTRATION CAN BIND AMERICA TO TREATIES AND AGREEMENTS WITHOUT THE
CONSENT OF THE U.S. SENATE, WHICH IS REQUIRED UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.
The zero draft concedes that, per international law, treaties between
countries must be ratified by national legislatures, thus respecting
the right of their citizens to consent.

However, the draft also includes a clause that the accord will go into
effect on a “provisional” basis, as soon as it is signed by
delegates to the WHO, and therefore IT WILL BE LEGALLY BINDING ON
MEMBERS WITHOUT BEING RATIFIED BY LEGISLATURES.

“WHOEVER DRAFTED THIS CLAUSE KNEW AS MUCH ABOUT U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW AS I DID, AND DELIBERATELY DRAFTED IT TO
CIRCUMVENT THE POWER OF THE SENATE TO GIVE ITS ADVICE AND CONSENT TO
TREATIES, TO PROVISIONALLY BRING IT INTO FORCE IMMEDIATELY UPON
SIGNATURE,” BOYLE SAID. In addition, “the Biden administration
will take the position that this is an international executive
agreement that the president can conclude of his own accord without
approval by Congress, and is binding on the United States of America,
including all state and local democratically elected officials,
governors, attorney generals and health officials.”

[ACTNOW, Click Here]
[[link removed]]


‘ONE HEALTH SURVEILLANCE’ AND MISINFORMATION

The WHO pandemic agreement calls for member states to implement “One
Health surveillance.” One Health is a concept that has been embraced
by the UN, the CDC, the World Bank, and other global organizations.

“The term originally meant a way of seeing human and animal health
as linked—they sometimes are—so that you could improve human
health by acting more broadly,” Bell said. “It has become hijacked
and now is used to claim that all human activities, and all issues
within the biosphere, affect health, and are therefore within Public
Health’s remit. SO PUBLIC HEALTH CAN BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE CLIMATE,
OR RACISM, OR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, AND THIS IS BEING USED TO CLAIM
THAT ADDRESSING CARBON EMISSIONS IS A HEALTH ISSUE AND THEREFORE A
HEALTH ‘EMERGENCY.’”

The WHO zero draft states that “‘One Health surveillance’ means
…,” leaving the definition to be worked out in future drafts.
Whatever One Health surveillance ultimately entails, however, the
signatories must invest in it, implement it, and “strengthen” it.
IN SEPTEMBER 2022, THE WORLD BANK APPROVED A FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARY
FUND (FIF) TO FINANCE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, ONE HEALTH SURVEILLANCE.

AMERICA’S MEMBERSHIP IN THE WHO

IN JULY 2020, THEN-PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP WITHDREW THE UNITED STATES
FROM MEMBERSHIP IN THE WHO. Citing the WHO’s dismal performance in
responding to the COVID pandemic and its ties to the Chinese Communist
Party (CCP), Trump said that U.S. funding of approximately half a
billion dollars per year would also cease.

IN RESPONSE, then-presidential-candidate Joe Biden vowed: “On my
first day as President, I will rejoin the WHO and restore our
leadership on the world stage.” Biden kept his promise and took it
one step further, negotiating the pandemic accord.

REDEFINING SOVEREIGNTY AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Following the Second World War and the state-control ideologies of
fascism, national socialism, and communism, “it was realized that
there has to be a fundamental understanding that individuals are
sovereign” Bell said.

“DO WE BELIEVE IN EQUALITY, OR DO WE BELIEVE IN A FEUDAL SYSTEM
WHERE WE HAVE A FEW PEOPLE AT THE TOP, CONTROLLING SOCIETY, TELLING
OTHERS WHAT TO DO? THAT’S THE DIRECTION WE’RE GOING IN.”

READ ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE>>
[[link removed]]

[Defund and Exit the WHO]
[[link removed]]


[ACTNOW, Click Here]
[[link removed]]


 

[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


_ACT for America Education, a 501(c)(3) organization._
_All donations are tax-deductible._

869 Lynnhaven Pkwy, 113 #411
Virginia Beach, VA 23452 USA

Contribute
[[link removed]]
| Charity Navigator
[[link removed]]
| Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]
 

[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]