[Russia faces the greatest defeat in its history. Russia had lost
the moment the first bomber took off towards Kyiv because at that
moment Russia had only two options - to become an invader or to be
crushed on the battlefield.]
[[link removed]]

THE BITTERNESS OF VICTORY, THE SWEETNESS OF DEFEAT  
[[link removed]]


 

Anna Ochkina
December 27, 2022
Russian Dissent
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ Russia faces the greatest defeat in its history. Russia had lost
the moment the first bomber took off towards Kyiv because at that
moment Russia had only two options - to become an invader or to be
crushed on the battlefield. _

,

 

TRANSLATED BY DAN ERDMAN

In Russia, in the Tver region, theres a city called Rzhev. This is an
ancient city, founded at the beginning of the 13th century. An old
Russian city that would be very nice if the local and regional
authorities cared a little about it. Nearby is the beautiful Volga,
still relatively narrow at this point, stormy, but without that
breadth and majesty that this famous Russian river boasts in its lower
reaches, closer to Saratov. But still, its banks at Rzhev are high,
steep, overgrown, and very impressive. Like all old cities, Rzhev is
inscribed in the landscape; the city has grown into and merged with
nature - with its hills and winding rivers, reluctantly retreating
from the city forest. In summer, the city looks charming, despite the
broken roads and peeling walls of the houses. Autumn, of course,
exposes disorder, throwing it into sharp relief until the snow covers
the city with its mystical veil, hiding everything broken and faded.

I refuse to acknowledge that anyone who has not been to Rzhev, or a
city like it, can claim an understanding of Russia.

Rzhev is, I am sure, a symbol of one particular national quality, a
complex characteristic of the Russian collective subconscious. The
thing is, we don’t like to lose. Of course, no one enjoys it, but
consider how the British glorify their defeats and exalt their losers;
recall how often the English-language cinema depicts the charge of the
light brigade, Dunkirk, Gallipoli. But we despise our defeats and are
afraid to talk about them. Russian historiography is characterized by
a focus on victorious operations and the triumph of Russian weapons in
those battles where the outcome was far from certain (for example, the
battle of Borodino against Napoleon in 1812, overgrown with legends
both in Russian history and public consciousness). Moreover, both
historians and the public quite often ignore those battles whose
outcomes at least resemble a defeat.

So it was with the Battle of Rzhev, which in fact was a series of
fierce battles that lasted almost continuously from the middle of 1942
to March 1943. Most often described as a “meat grinder,”
“tragedy,” “failure,” it is still quite often understood as
three military operations following almost one after another in the
summer and autumn of 1942, and again in March 1943.

In fiction and cinema, the battles of Rzhev, as a rule, are the
backdrop for depicting the tragedy of the war. It is probably
impossible to find a Russian, at least one over 50 years old, who does
not know at least a few lines from that poignant poem of Alexander
Tvardovsky, “I Was Killed Near Rzhev.”
[[link removed]]

Strictly speaking, Rzhev was not such a terrible defeat, although the
military operations there did not achieve their goals, and the losses
were huge: about 400,000 killed and about 800,000 wounded. The 33rd
Army, including Army Commander Efremov, was surrounded and completely
defeated. But the German troops did not achieve terribly impressive
success either, and in March 1943 they were forced to retreat, though
the 9th Army of Walter Model was not defeated and fled without
tangible losses.

During the period of Perestroika, when the country (then the USSR) was
seized by a fever of revelations, much was written about the losses
and tragedies of the Great Patriotic War (in Russia we rarely say -
World War II, almost always - Great Patriotic War), with the story of
Rzhev finding frequent mention. It even came to be known as the
“secret battle.” Of course there was no strict secrecy around the
battle, but Rzhev had never received much attention in textbooks, or
films, or official events in honor of the victory. On the other hand
though, every schoolchild knew the names Stalingrad and Kursk - but
then again we won there.

The simple idea that victory was forged by those who fell in lost
battles somehow did not take root in the Russian mind. Of course there
is a monument to the unknown soldier, and it has been said a thousand
times “your name is unknown, your feat is immortal,” but still, it
is customary to glorify the heroes and the winners, while it’s
enough to merely remember the losers - either with vodka, or in an
official speech, in which no one can be forgotten. The fact is that
Russians are a little obsessed with national pride, which in our
country is somehow mystically intertwined with a passion for
self-abasement, prone to an over-the-top boast that “only we could
have done such a disgrace.” At the same time, Russians will hardly
tolerate foreigners’ criticism of their country, while they
themselves incessantly criticize an abstract “them,” and don’t
really like to notice and discuss real or past defeats.

Once I told my friend that the Museum of Great Defeats could be opened
in Rzhev. The friend objected, insisting that defeats are not great,
why even focus on failures? This is a very common opinion in Russia.
We were raised to win, that’s the thing. Even in Soviet history
textbooks, the victories of the tsarist army were sung, and a variety
of justifications were sought for defeats. The only exceptions were
the First World War and the Civil War, but then the Bolsheviks
eventually won the latter, creating the USSR. Coming to a dead end,
and then marking it with a flag so that it may be easier for others to
find the right path - this is not for Russians. We have never praised
those who found a dead end. Falling in a lost battle, even one that
later becomes a springboard for subsequent victories, is not a triumph
from our point of view. Give us a victory without a prehistory.

And if defeats are exaggerated in modern films about the Patriotic
War, this is an ideological device designed to debunk the Bolsheviks
in every possible way, to blame them for all the defeats, and yet to
still write their victories into our tradition and historical memory.

Now Russia faces the greatest defeat in its history. The greatest
because, no matter how events unfolded after February 24, 2022, Russia
had lost the precise moment when the first bomber took off towards
Kyiv. Why? Because at that moment Russia had only two options left -
to become an invader or to be crushed on the battlefield. The capture
of Ukraine would require a Russia bursting with weapons, and feeding
on unjust anger for a long time, constantly suppressing resistance in
the captured country - a country intimately close to Russia in
language, blood, culture, history. This would be the path to the
decomposition of the moral core of society, to the death of the soul
of the people. This could destroy once and for all those truly great
achievements of the USSR and Russia, both of which in reality, and not
in the feverish delirium of propagandists, made our world a better
place. Such a “victory” would in reality be a complete failure for
Russia.

But what will come of Russia’s looming defeat on the battlefield?
Will Russian society be able to understand, and, most importantly, to
admit that it was simply deceived, that the goals were false? Will
Russian citizens be able to understand that, behind the inflated
enthusiasm generated by well-paid propagandists, the authorities were
merely striving for a very primitive and utilitarian kind of survival?
And, having understood, will they be able to perceive the defeat not
as the end of Russia, but as its true beginning? “Chaos is a
ladder,” says Lord Baelish in the _Game of Thrones_ series. Petyr
Baelish is a more than unpleasant hero, but the phrase is good, if one
might agree.

Today, I often hear from those who initially did not approve of the
special operation in Ukraine that, having fully engaged, Russia cannot
possibly retreat now. After all, it would be a defeat, and defeat is
unacceptable. Any objections recalling that Russia somehow survived
both the Crimean War and the Japanese War, was revived by a revolution
after the defeat in the First World War, that the USSR was forced to
retreat from Afghanistan, will be met with the same rebuff, which I
have heard from several different people. They answer me something
like this: “Firstly, the USSR just collapsed almost immediately
after Afghanistan, and, secondly, it’s all completely different
now.” I also hear very unflattering comments about those who left
Russia after the announcement of mobilization. Some young people admit
that they will go to the front because one of their friends,
relatives, or neighbors has left. “I can’t just sit there while
they’re being killed.” It seems that the majority of society is
desperately afraid to face defeat, desperately afraid of being
cowardly. Although the most difficult and courageous action today
would be to lose to others in order to win oneself.

I think the Russians need to grow up. We all need, finally, to stop
perceiving the state as a hybrid of Leviathan and Santa Claus, from
which one can expect either big trouble or big gifts. My fellow
citizens must finally understand that the state is nothing more than
an instrument that they direct for the solution of common problems.
The instrument cannot control its owner, cannot dictate to him how to
live and what to do. But the owner also has a duty - to keep his tool
in order, use it correctly, control it, and prevent it from falling
into the wrong hands.

It is a pity that you have to grow up again in the war, like several
generations before. Maybe it is possible that the urge for
militaristic revenge lurks in society, growing and waiting for its
mission. If efforts are not made to debunk the propaganda myth of
national humiliation in the event of a lost war, such a danger will
become very real.

But perhaps the current generations of Russians will be able to become
the generations of the Great Defeat, which will clear the way to real
victories. A defeat that will help defeat real, not imagined evil:
dictatorship, lawlessness, social oppression and corruption. We must
overcome all this in our own country, and this will be the greatest
victory that no interpreters of history can belittle.

Maybe then my Museum of Great Defeats will open, and both life and
beauty will return to the abandoned Rzhev, and to many other places in
Russia.

_Anna Ochkina
[[link removed]],
Russian sociologist, is Associate Professor and head of the Department
of the Methodology of Science, Social Theories and Technologies at the
Penza State University (Russia). She is Deputy Director of the
Institute for Global Research and Social Movements (IGSO) and deputy
editor of the journal Levaya politika (Left Politics)._

_Subscribe [[link removed]] to get full
access to this newsletter and website
[[link removed]]. Never miss an update._

* Russia
[[link removed]]
* Ukraine
[[link removed]]
* History
[[link removed]]
* Soviet Union
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]

Manage subscription
[[link removed]]

Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]