[ One lesson is that he showed up, repeatedly, in places that
Democrats rarely visited. He began during his run for Senate in 2016,
when he lost in the primary. After he was elected lieutenant governor
in 2018, he traveled the state constantly.]
[[link removed]]

HOW DEMOCRATS CAN BUILD A JOHN FETTERMAN 2.0  
[[link removed]]


 

Michael Sokolove
November 15, 2022
New York Times
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ One lesson is that he showed up, repeatedly, in places that
Democrats rarely visited. He began during his run for Senate in 2016,
when he lost in the primary. After he was elected lieutenant governor
in 2018, he traveled the state constantly. _

photo: Justin Merriman for The New York Times,

 

When John Fetterman announced his candidacy for the U.S. Senate early
in 2021, he vowed to compete everywhere, including areas of
Pennsylvania that “feel left behind” and not “part of the
conversation.” His campaign mantra was, “Every county, every
vote.”

To many political professionals, this sounded like a promise that
would give way to the unforgiving arithmetic of a statewide campaign.
Rural voters in Pennsylvania, as elsewhere in America, have been
increasingly beyond the reach of Democrats. So why bother when you can
just mine the deep trove of Democratic votes in the cities and
close-in suburbs?

But Mr. Fetterman, the state’s lieutenant governor and an
unconventional politician in almost every way, did not waver. And the
results showed that he had substantially cut into the huge margins
that Donald Trump ran up in Pennsylvania’s deep-red communities in
defeating Hillary Clinton in 2016 — and again four years later in
losing the state, just barely, to Joe Biden.

Mr. Biden won Pennsylvania by a razor-thin 1.2 percentage points. Mr.
Fetterman’s margin over Mehmet Oz was over four percentage points
— a comfortable quarter million votes. He outpaced Mr. Biden and
Mrs. Clinton in some of the metropolitan areas, most notably
Pittsburgh and its suburbs — but much of the difference was in the
votes from across a landscape of small towns and rural communities.

Mr. Fetterman’s victory represented the only Senate seat that either
Democrats or Republicans flipped last week. Exactly how Mr. Fetterman
was able to beat Dr. Oz — in a swing state and even after suffering
a near-fatal stroke that kept him off the campaign trail for weeks —
is worthy of close study by Democrats. Voters’ willingness to send a
still-recovering candidate to Washington implies a strong emotional
investment in Mr. Fetterman.

No candidate can be replicated, and that is especially true of Mr.
Fetterman. He is 6-foot-8 with a shaved head, multiple tattoos and a
sartorial style that leans to hipster rustic. There are not a lot of
other inked-up giants Democrats can put up for office — but
Democrats can take these lessons from his winning campaign.

One lesson from Mr. Fetterman is that he showed up, repeatedly, in
places that Democrats rarely visited. He began during his run for
Senate in 2016, when he lost in the primary. After he was elected
lieutenant governor in 2018, a job with few official duties, he
traveled the state constantly.

“He has physically spent more time in rural Pennsylvania than any
candidate I’ve ever seen,” Jeff Eggleston, the chairman of the
state’s Democratic Rural Caucus, told me. “He got to know people.
He spent time in our backyards. He made real, meaningful
relationships, so people were willing to make a huge sacrifice in
order to get him over the finish line.”

Mr. Eggleston is from Warren County, in the far northwest corner of
Pennsylvania. If you looked at the results of last week’s Senate
race in only that county — 63 percent for Dr. Oz to 34 percent for
Mr. Fetterman — you might think it was a bad night for the Democrat.
But Mr. Trump twice won the county with nearly 70 percent of the vote.
The same pattern repeated in rural areas across the state and, in
combination with a solid performance with Democratic voters in the
cities and close-in suburbs, allowed Mr. Fetterman to claim victory.

Mr. Fetterman’s style and appearance are the first things that set
him apart. Neil Oxman, a Philadelphia consultant who has run more than
a dozen statewide races, including those of the two-term governor Ed
Rendell, said that “you can’t discount the look” — his
signature outfit is a Carhartt hoodie and cargo shorts. Mr. Oxman
noted: “It’s an entry. He can talk to blue-collar people in a way
that other Democrats have been failing at.”

Another lesson in Mr. Fetterman’s success is that the issues that
animate him have stayed consistent. They amount to an idiosyncratic
basket of concerns that, critically, do not come off as poll-driven.
As lieutenant governor, he headed the Board of Pardons and strongly
advocated granting clemency to inmates who had served long terms and
posed no threat. Dr. Oz spent millions on TV ads hammering him as
lenient on crime, but Mr. Fetterman did not back down on the issue.

Mr. Fetterman has long supported the legalization of marijuana and
flew a flag displaying cannabis leaves from his office in Harrisburg.
“The advocacy for legal marijuana is a big thing,” said
Christopher Borick, a pollster and the director of the Muhlenberg
College Institute of Public Opinion in Pennsylvania. “If you look at
polling, it resonates with groups that Democrats struggle with — a
lot of the white working class and young men — white,
non-college-educated men.”

“The aspects that he put together will be looked at. We may see some
Fetterman 2.0s in the next cycle,” Mr. Borick added.

Though Mr. Fetterman is a “prototypical white working-class male,”
said Anat Shenker-Osorio, a Bay Area-based strategist for progressive
candidates and organizations — “a dude’s dude,” if you will
— she notes that he played against that type after his stroke. “He
demonstrated vulnerability. Stereotypically, his kind of male is not
supposed to be weak or fall down. He admitted he was not in control
and lifted up vulnerability as a strength.”

Pennsylvania has never elected a female governor or senator, and its
Legislature has been dominated by men. The Supreme Court’s decision
to overturn Roe v. Wade played a critical role — most
likely _the _critical role — in the much better than expected
midterm performance by Democrats generally and by Mr. Fetterman in
particular. He had already been an unyielding advocate of abortion
rights; he talked about the issue more frequently after the Dobbs v.
Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision. “Would he have won
without Dobbs?” Mr. Borick said. “I’m not so sure.”

One thing that others might take from Mr. Fetterman is that while he
hit hard at Dr. Oz, it was often with a sense of fun that stood out in
an otherwise grim political atmosphere. To remind voters that his
opponent was a longtime New Jerseyan who had only recently moved
across state lines, his campaign (including the social media producer
Annie Wu) trolled Dr. Oz with social media videos from Nicole LaValle,
née Polizzi, a cast member of the “Jersey Shore” franchise better
known as Snooki, and Steven Van Zandt of Bruce Springsteen’s E
Street Band.

Both Mr. Fetterman and his wife, Gisele, are witty users of social
media. Even their dog has a Twitter account. On the morning after the
election, I talked to Mr. Fetterman’s campaign manager, Brendan
McPhillips, about what lessons can be drawn from the campaign.
“It’s about embracing candidates for who they are and not trying
to nominate the same cookie-cutter people or mold them into something
they’re not,” he said. “And you can’t try to slice off entire
demographic categories and ignore them. It’s a recipe for
failure.”

Ms. Shenker-Osorio told me that the Democratic establishment in
Pennsylvania lined up in the spring primary behind Mr. Fetterman’s
opponent, Conor Lamb, a moderate congressman from a family with a deep
history in Democratic politics.

Mr. Fetterman “was deemed too lefty,” she said. “They
desperately wanted Lamb. So, as Step 1, how about we put an ax through
‘electability’ and recall that the middle of the road is where you
get run over.”

_[MICHAEL SOKOLOVE, an author and contributing writer for The New York
Times Magazine, writes frequently about Pennsylvania politics and
culture.]_

* 2022 Elections
[[link removed]]
* John Fetterman
[[link removed]]
* Pennsylvania
[[link removed]]
* Democratic Party
[[link removed]]
* Working Families Party
[[link removed]]
* 2024 Elections
[[link removed]]
* Bernie Sanders
[[link removed]]
* Joe Biden
[[link removed]]
* working class voters
[[link removed]]
* rural voters
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]

Manage subscription
[[link removed]]

Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]