[With bargaining organized and led by workers, Starbucks Workers
United’s proposals often focus on specific changes to systems that
workers interact with all day, every day. ]
[[link removed]]

5 STORE-LEVEL CHANGES DRIVING THE STARBUCKS UNION  
[[link removed]]


 

Aneurin Canham-Clyne
November 10, 2022
Restaurant Dive
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ With bargaining organized and led by workers, Starbucks Workers
United’s proposals often focus on specific changes to systems that
workers interact with all day, every day. _

,

 

Over the last year, Starbucks employees told Restaurant Dive about
small problems disrupting their work —  issues such as an unclean
grease trap, threatening customers, deluges of mobile orders, bees in
stores, lack of emergency planning and managers who took down Pride
paraphernalia. These problems pushed them to ask for changes, unionize
or, in some cases, strike. 

For the workers and organizers participating in the campaign, the
process has often proven personally transformative. The Starbucks
employees who spoke to Restaurant Dive tend to be younger, ranging
from 17 to 37 in age, and are often college-educated or are attending
Starbucks for its college benefits.  

“It made me stronger,” Aleah Bacetti, a union organizer who was
fired for what Starbucks described as “use of harassing or abusive
language,” said. “I endured racism and harassment by my peers, by
my management team. And even though I was fired, I overcame it. And my
union is still going strong, and we won. We got our certification. And
we’re bargaining.”

For younger workers, the campaign has become a way to connect with
others. Sam Shields, a barista in Washington, D.C., who sings opera
off the clock, said she feels like she’s a leader now. Megan Brown,
a Starbucks Workers United national bargaining committee member in
Illinois, found a calling.

“This is just what I want to do with my life. I really enjoy
advocating for workers’ rights, and bargaining contracts, and all of
this,” said Brown, who is still in high school.

Casey Moore, a Buffalo, New York-area barista who delayed law school
to throw herself into organizing, said the factors that drove the
campaign haven’t dissipated. The physical intensity of barista labor
reaggravated back injuries she sustained in a car crash, and gave her
new injuries, requiring her to wear a wrist brace to deal with pain
caused by the job. The nature of QSR labor itself, which combines
physical difficulty with emotional performance, also drove Moore to
push for a union contract.

“When I was a waitress, for example, I had a bit more incentive to
be nice to people so they [tip] you,” Moore said. “No matter how
nice I am to people, they’re still going to be awful to me here. And
I’m still gonna leave [for] home with the same amount of money at
the end of the day.”

For her, the campaign has offered a way to deal with that drudgery.

“I’m doing things that I never thought that I would do,” Moore
said. “It’s super empowering, and fun and scary.”

Other workers have seen the campaign transform their lives. Julie
Langevin, a Starbucks shift manager and member of SBWU’s national
bargaining committee, has worked at Starbucks for 17 years. Though her
store lost its election, she has found a sense of meaning in the
campaign.

While the union campaign is seeking changes that would impact
corporate culture and labor relations, Starbucks Workers United
members are also seeking changes at the store level. With bargaining
organized and led by workers, SBWU’s proposals often focus on
specific changes to systems that workers interact with all day, every
day. These are some of the topics workers mentioned as personal
priorities in contract negotiations.

1. Wage hikes 

Every worker Restaurant Dive interviewed about contract demands
mentioned wages. These baristas want Starbucks to pay its employees
more by basing compensation on living wages in different regions. But
most said pay hikes aren’t an immediate priority compared to
operational changes at stores.

2. Ability to turn off mobile ordering 

Currently, Starbucks stores can’t shut down mobile orders without
direct permission from a manager and a district manager, according to
Langevin. Customers can grow frustrated with the wait times, but
there’s nothing workers can do, she said.

“We have to ask permission to turn mobile [ordering] off when
we’re drowning, when we have a wait time of 40 minutes on our line,
and we have customers standing there asking, ‘Where’s my
drink,’” Langevin said. “We’re not allowed to turn that off
because it cuts into Starbucks’ bottom line.”

3. Improved equipment

For workers at the 1429 P Street Starbucks location in Washington,
D.C., the union campaign is about safety and functioning equipment.
Tae Cunningham, a barista and SBWU member, said he wants to see the
company fix equipment in a timely manner. 

“It always [breaks] on a day where we need it the most. A day where
every customer wants a specific item, but we just can’t make it,”
Cunningham said.

When the P Street location’s cold brew machine broke down earlier
this year, Starbucks didn’t fix it for over a week, Cunningham said.
This led customers to get frustrated or become confrontational with
workers. Worse, Cunningham said, the machine didn’t function
properly even after the repair, and it took the company two months to
replace it.

Sam Shields, who also works at the P Street Starbucks, said she wants
her store to be renovated. The store is a small location on the first
floor of an apartment building. Shields and Cunningham both emphasized
the cramped nature of the work. Shields wants other minor changes,
like soft-close cabinets that would prevent painful injuries. 

For many, smaller proposed changes like this are part of a
transformational promise by the union, that employees can exercise
power together, rather than relying on sending reports up the
corporate chain in the hopes of change. 

4. Fewer out-of-pocket uniform expenses 

Kylah Clay, a barista and organizer in Boston, wants Starbucks to wash
the aprons it provides to her. Clay has two aprons the company gave
her, but in Boston at least, Starbucks does not launder aprons for
workers. In Clay’s experience, the company rarely has backup aprons
at her store. Clay wants the company to buy union-made aprons and wash
them at unionized industrial laundries.

“We have to wash our own aprons. It’s not the biggest deal of all
things, but these things get dirty so quickly,” Clay said. In
Boston, where a single load at a laundromat can cost $5, this can
absorb a good chunk of workers’ pay. Clay makes about $15 dollars an
hour, slightly more than the Massachusetts minimum wage of $14.25.

Bacetti wants Starbucks to pay for non-slip shoes. The company’s
dress code asks employees to wear non-slip shoes made of nonporous
materials, as is common in foodservice settings. But Starbucks does
not reimburse workers for the expense.

“If you’re going to ask for people to wear non-slips you should
provide that, like, if it is going to be a safety measure, provide
that. Don’t cop out to be cheap,” Bacetti said. 

Langevin, who is a shift manager in Massachusetts, said the non-slip
issue can make it hard for new workers, who have to pay for dress
code-compliant clothing and equipment before receiving any pay from
the company.

“We have to wash our own aprons. It’s not the biggest deal of all
things, but these things get dirty so quickly,” Clay said. In
Boston, where a single load at a laundromat can cost $5, this can
absorb a good chunk of workers’ pay. Clay makes about $15 dollars an
hour, slightly more than the Massachusetts minimum wage of $14.25.

Bacetti wants Starbucks to pay for non-slip shoes. The company’s
dress code asks employees to wear non-slip shoes made of nonporous
materials, as is common in foodservice settings. But Starbucks does
not reimburse workers for the expense.

“If you’re going to ask for people to wear non-slips you should
provide that, like, if it is going to be a safety measure, provide
that. Don’t cop out to be cheap,” Bacetti said. 

Langevin, who is a shift manager in Massachusetts, said the non-slip
issue can make it hard for new workers, who have to pay for dress
code-compliant clothing and equipment before receiving any pay from
the company.

5. COVID-19 leave

Workers have criticized Starbucks’ COVID-19 and emergency responses
since the start of the union campaign. Now that Starbucks has ended
COVID-19 catastrophe pay and many other emergency protections, SBWU
members want the company to improve its sick leave policies and
overall planning for emergencies. 

Clay said Starbucks’ COVID-19 leave policies are inadequate,
sometimes leaving sick workers responsible for finding coverage for
their shifts when they run out of paid sick leave. Starbucks said
workers with COVID-19 can take short-term disability if they have no
more sick days. But Clay said workers’ ability to receive a leave of
absence depends on healthcare providers, and that the length of leave
time can be limited.

“I just want to make sure that people can take the time that they
need to get healthy again,” Clay said. “If people can’t return
to work right now, they should be able to take a protected leave.”

At the start of October
[[link removed]],
Starbucks discontinued self-isolation pay, vaccine pay and side
effects pay. Starbucks ended those benefits without bargaining with
SBWU, but said it had no obligation to bargain over those changes
because the COVID-19 benefits and catastrophe pay offered to workers
were always intended to be temporary.

Workers want to hold Starbucks accountable to progressive values

The campaign has changed many workers’ relationships with Starbucks,
and many see the union drive as a way to make the company live up to
its self-professed progressive values.

“We started this campaign saying, we love Starbucks,” Moore said.
“It’s very hard to say that now after seeing everything that
they’ve done.”

Langevin said that when she started at the company in 2005, its
benefits and pay really were superior to what other foodservice jobs
offered. She also found it to be a welcoming place that met people’s
needs. 

“I refer to myself as somebody who drank the Starbucks Kool-Aid real
early,” Langevin said. “I really, really thought that Starbucks’
values were the heart of the company, and they tried to honor those. 
And I do not believe that at all anymore. ... I still strive to reach
and meet those values. But I know that it’s not coming from higher
up, and that just hurts.”

* Starbucks Workers United
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]

Manage subscription
[[link removed]]

Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]