Democracy Dollars on the ballot

In just 75 days, voters in Oakland, California have the opportunity to vote for the [link removed] Oakland Fair Elections Act [ [link removed] ], which would create a “democracy dollars” system of public funding of elections. With democracy dollars, each Oakland resident will receive democracy vouchers worth $100. Residents can give these vouchers to city council and mayor candidates, and the candidates then exchange the vouchers for public funds to run their campaigns.

In Seattle, which has had democracy vouchers since 2017, candidates can run for office and win without depending on special interest money. All residents can contribute to candidates, regardless of their personal level of wealth, which encourages candidates to campaign in all areas of the city –not just the high-income areas. The Seattle program [link removed] increased the number of small donations [ [link removed] ]as well as the number of candidates, providing voters greater choice. There’s more about Oakland’s Measure W at [link removed] FairElectionsOakland.org [ [link removed] ]and democracy vouchers–in comic form–in this [link removed] excerpt from my book [ [link removed] ]Unrig .

The Oakland ballot measure has been four years in the making, with MapLight co-leading the effort alongside groups like Common Cause California, the ACLU of Northern California, the League of Women Voters of Oakland, Oakland Rising, Bay Rising, and Asian Americans Advancing Justice. MapLight’s March report on money in Oakland elections found that just half of all fundraising by candidates came from Oakland residents, and that campaign contributions came disproportionately from Oakland's richest and whitest neighborhoods. Know someone in Oakland? Encourage them to find out more about Measure W and to vote Yes!
Counting the votes in Congress
At the height of the 2020 election campaign, MapLight published [link removed] Election in Peril [ [link removed] ], a comprehensive report on improving the laws governing presidential elections. We noted that the Electoral Count Act, an archaic law that governs how Congress counts votes, has dangerous gaps in ambiguities. We recommended that Congress rewrite this law, in place since 1887, to prevent ambiguity in future disputed elections. Following this advice from MapLight and other groups, Republicans and Democrats in Congress have put forward [link removed] Electoral Count Act reforms [ [link removed] ], to prevent future constitutional crises.
Engineering Manager for Democracy
Come work with us to improve democracy – [link removed] we’re hiring an Engineering Manager ! Please share with lists or people who may be interested.

Would you like to change how you receive these emails?
Please [link removed] update your preferences or [link removed] unsubscribe from this mailing list . [link removed]






----------------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent by [email protected] to [email protected]

Not interested?Unsubscribe - [link removed]

Update profile - [link removed]




MapLight | 2140 Shattuck Ave Suite 603, Berkeley, CA 94704
|



Our Privacy Policy [ ] and Terms of Use. [ ]