I don't like a "stacked" Supreme Court, either as it is now, or by adding more liberal seats. I also think age limits might be challenged as unconstitutional (as it has in the regular workplace).
However, term limits hold a lot of appeal. Remember that there used to be no term limits on the president, but after Franklin D. Roosevelt, that became law (constitutional amendment). Term limits would automatically create turnover, avoiding appointing really young justices who can support a president's political leanings for a very long time. I don't know what the term should be, but I'd say 12 years should be enough.
While we're at it, how about 12 years (two terms) for senators, and six terms for House representatives. There's something to be said for experience, but probably lots more against permanency and fossilization. —Read G., Utah
SCOTUS has already been "packed" by the right wing.
Obama was denied the opportunity to seat a justice.
The best government money can buy, thanks to the "Citizens United" decision.
The GOP is free to suppress the Black vote, thanks to yet another misbegotten decision, "Shelby."
Time to "unpack" the court, which has been totally politicized. —Barry L., Massachusetts
|