Russia's bullying Ukraine again

[link removed]
Those of us of a certain age remember, often with fondness, the Ronald Reagan years. For me, a child and teenager at the time, Reagan came to embody the spirit of the good fight of democracy against communism. Not everyone agreed with his tactics, but Reagan and, later, his successor, George H.W. Bush, were instrumental in helping to end the Cold War. It was a remarkable time. How times have changed. In recent years, we've witnessed a growing coziness between Republicans and the Kremlin, which, in some ways, is no less malignant under Vladimir Putin than it was under the Soviets. Stateside, some Republicans seem to have embraced as their chief mission not the lofty goal of defeating a global menace but, ironically, the right to tell private companies what to do. I suspect the two proud Republicans whose foreign policy helped defuse the communist threat a generation ago would struggle to recognize their party today. —Melissa Amour, Managing Editor

NEW TO THE TOPLINE? SUBSCRIBE NOW ([link removed])
Love THE TOPLINE? Help us spread the word and earn TOPLINE rewards here ([link removed]) .
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]'s%20Daily%20Digest: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fstanduprepublic.com%2Fthetopline040621 Tweet ([link removed]'s%20Daily%20Digest: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Fstanduprepublic.com%2Fthetopline040621)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])


** No more smiles
------------------------------------------------------------

What's Russia up to? Ceasefire violations and reinforcements of Russian-backed forces at the Russia-Ukraine border are raising concerns about Moscow's latest intentions. The moves even prompted a phone call on Friday between President Biden and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who is seeking to fast-track NATO admission for his country. But not everyone is convinced that it’s the next Crimea. Some observers say it's just Putin being Putin. "[President Vladimir] Putin wants to demonstrate that he's the tough guy…that the U.S. is all talk and no action. That is part of the psychological pushback on the Biden Administration," says a former senior State Department official. —Defense One ([link removed])
* — Russia. In another case of Putin being Putin, he signed a law yesterday allowing him to potentially hold onto power until 2036, formalizing the constitutional changes rubber-stamped by the Kremlin-controlled legislature last July. Opposition leaders criticized the vote extending his term, arguing that it was tarnished by pressure on voters and other irregularities, as well as a lack of transparency and independent monitoring. —Associated Press ([link removed])
*
* — Taiwan. Ukraine isn't the only country feeling the heat from a more powerful neighbor. Taiwan's Defense Ministry says China's air force infiltrated its air defense identification zone yesterday. Over the last few months, Taiwan has reported recurrent incursions by Chinese military near the island. Late last month, 20 Chinese aircraft were involved in one such incident. —Reuters ([link removed])
*
* — Iran. Iran, which has been courting closer ties with both China and Russia, is holding indirect talks with U.S. officials today in what could be the first step toward reviving the 2015 nuclear deal. The meetings, hosted by the European Union, will work toward two separate agreements that would bring both countries back into compliance with the deal's terms—constraining Tehran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. —ABC News ([link removed])

MORE: Netanyahu's corruption trial opens as Israel grapples with fourth stalemate election —NBC News ([link removed])


** Dems set to filibust a move
------------------------------------------------------------

Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled yesterday that Democrats can use a budget process to push pivotal bills, like President Biden's $2 trillion infrastructure plan, through the gridlocked chamber. This is a big win for Democrats. Usually, the Senate needs 60 votes to overcome a filibuster and pass legislation related to taxing and spending. The ruling will allow Democrats to amend the budget resolution recently used for the pandemic relief bill via reconciliation—a process that only requires a simple majority. —USA Today ([link removed])

MORE: Biden plan spurs fight over what 'infrastructure' really means —The New York Times ([link removed])


** Rubin: GOP defends corporate speech...unless it supports voting rights
------------------------------------------------------------

"Republicans sought to suppress voting by invoking the Big Lie of voter fraud and 'irregularities,' which was repeatedly debunked in more than 60 court cases brought against election results. Now, when businesses oppose those efforts and exercise their First Amendment rights, which Republicans ordinarily consider ‘fundamental’ and worthy of protection, they seek to use the power of the government to punish those whose speech they dislike." —Jennifer Rubin in ([link removed]) The Washington Post ([link removed])

Jennifer Rubin is an attorney and political opinion columnist at
The Washington Post.

MORE: After new law, McConnell warns CEOs: 'Stay out of politics' —Associated Press ([link removed])


** 'That in no way, shape, or form is anything that is by policy'
------------------------------------------------------------

The Derek Chauvin trial continued yesterday with gripping testimony by Minneapolis Police Chief Medaria Arradondo, who rejected Chauvin's actions during the arrest of George Floyd in May 2020. "Once Mr. Floyd had stopped resisting, and certainly once he was in distress and trying to verbalize that, that should have stopped," Arradondo said. “When Mr. Floyd was no longer responsive and even motionless, to continue to apply that level of force to a person proned out, handcuffed behind their back...it is not part of our training, and it is certainly not part of our ethics or our values." —CNN ([link removed])

MORE: Derek Chauvin trial: Man in car with George Floyd appears in court; police chief says cops 'absolutely' violated policy —USA Today ([link removed])
[link removed]'s%20amazing!%20Check%20it%20out: [link removed] EARN TOPLINE REWARDS ON TWITTER ([link removed]'s%20amazing!%20Check%20it%20out: [link removed])


** Gerson: Science saved us. When will MAGA World figure that out?
------------------------------------------------------------

"The experts said Americans could influence the spread of the disease by taking basic measures such as mask-wearing and social distancing. The disease was controlled when people did these things. The disease ran rampant when they did not, killing a lot of old and vulnerable people in the process. There were, of course, disagreements along the way about the length of lockdowns and the form of mandates. But on the whole, American citizens have witnessed one of the most dramatic vindications of scientific expertise in our history." —Michael Gerson in ([link removed]) The Washington Post ([link removed])

Michael Gerson is a columnist at
The Washington Post who formerly served as a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and the chief speechwriter for former President George W. Bush.

MORE: White evangelical resistance is obstacle in vaccination effort —The New York Times ([link removed])


** Focus on social media
------------------------------------------------------------

Social media is having a tough week. Yesterday, in a Supreme Court decision to dismiss a case concerning Donald Trump's use of Twitter as president, Justice Clarence Thomas suggested that Congress should consider updating laws to better regulate social media platforms. Thomas argued that digital platforms "provide avenues for historically unprecedented amounts of speech," but concentrate control "of so much speech in the hands of a few private parties." ([link removed])
* — Two sides, same conclusion. Like Thomas, some Republicans have called for more regulation of social media to combat perceived political bias. While platforms have not historically been subject to such regulation, a host of social media-related ills, such as the proliferation of disinformation and extremism, has led some Democrats to consider increased regulation as well. —CNN ([link removed])
*
* — False hope for sale. Speaking of ills, Facebook is being used by human smugglers to openly advertise their services. They're promising Central Americans interested in crossing illegally into the U.S. a "100% safe journey." The use of social media by smugglers isn't new, but the practice is growing, as more migrants fall prey to misinformation about how the Biden Administration will welcome them, according to Homeland Security officials. —NBC News ([link removed])
*
* — Hack to the future. A couple years ago, hackers breached more than 500 million Facebook accounts. Fast forward to 2021, and the information they collected is still available on a website for hackers. In another example of the limits of social media security, the data includes Facebook IDs, full names, locations, birthdates, phone numbers, and email addresses from 106 countries. Yikes. —CBS News ([link removed])

MORE: Here's how to tell if your Facebook account was one of the half billion that were breached —CNN ([link removed])


** Kreiss & McGregor: It's bigger than social media
------------------------------------------------------------

"Instead of nonpartisan and apolitical approaches to polarization and tech reform, Facebook and the broader community of researchers, reformers, policymakers, and journalists concerned with social media and democracy should focus their attention on the threats posed by anti-democratic extremism and the destabilizing effects of racial inequality. White supremacy not only prevented our country from becoming a truly multiracial democracy until the 1960s, it has proven to be destabilizing and destructive to democracy." —Daniel Kreiss & Shannon McGregor on ([link removed]) WIRED ([link removed])

Daniel Kreiss is the Edgar Thomas Cato Distinguished Associate Professor in the Hussman School of Journalism and Media and a principal researcher at the Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life at UNC Chapel Hill. Shannon McGregor is an assistant professor in the Hussman School of Journalism and Media, and a senior researcher at the Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life at UNC Chapel Hill.

MORE: Tech companies run anti-immigrant hate group ads amid border hype —Sludge ([link removed])

The first steps in solving a problem are to acknowledge there is a problem and then to define the problem. There are more steps in the process, but if the foundation is wrong, you rarely ever solve the problem. When it comes to gun-related deaths in this country, especially mass shootings, I am not sure some people even see such deaths as a problem. Furthermore, it's not clear they have actually defined the problem, i.e., the root cause. One cause many will point to is mental illness of the shooter(s). Let's go with it and be clear: is there any doubt in anyone's mind that anyone who kills innocent, unarmed people in a church, a school, a movie theater, a spa, etc., has some sort of mental issue?

The only solution for some is to screen for mental illness when purchasing a gun. Seems to make sense. But here's what's missing. What about all the folks who currently have guns? Wouldn't "regular screenings" of all current owners be necessary, since people can "snap" due to life events such as a divorce, death of a loved one, an election, the loss of a job, loss of a lifestyle, and on and on? There are somewhere around 400 million total guns owned by civilians in the U.S. They are owned by roughly 30% of American civilians. Think about that for a minute. I was in the military years ago, and we were evaluated/screened regularly. I assume it is still done, as I assume it is done in law enforcement. Civilians have access to weapons, and we do nothing. It just seems wrong to me.

When it comes to preventing mass shootings, or at least cutting the numbers of them, it is not rocket science. Say what you like, but many of them involve "weapons of war," designed to kill people, lots of people, as quickly as possible. Period. They are not used for hunting deer, elk, rabbits, and birds. They are used for hunting people. And when it comes to mass shootings, there are two factors that seem common—a person with some sort of mental issue and a gun. Focusing on only one aspect of that equation will not come close to solving the problem. —Bill T., Arizona
TELL US WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT TODAY'S STORIES ([link removed])


** The views expressed in "What's Your Take?" are submitted by readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial staff or the Stand Up Republic Foundation.
------------------------------------------------------------
Got feedback about THE TOPLINE? Send it to Melissa Amour, Managing Editor, at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) .
CARE ABOUT DEMOCRACY? SHARE SOME DEMOCRACY.
If you love THE TOPLINE, share it with your friends and reap the rewards—from a shoutout in an issue of TL, to exclusive swag, to a call with Evan and Mindy.
[link removed]
Your Dashboard has everything you need to easily share THE TOPLINE
and track your progress.
VISIT YOUR DASHBOARD NOW TO GET STARTED ([link removed])

============================================================
** ([link removed])
The Topline is a project of the Stand Up Republic Foundation.

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.

700 Pennsylvania Ave SE · Washington, DC 20003-2493 · USA