From Andrew Yang <[email protected]>
Subject What We Do For a Living
Date July 6, 2026 12:03 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
View this post on the web at [link removed]

Hello, I hope that your summer is going great. I had a lovely 4th at a friend’s barbecue.
As you know, I ran for President in 2020 with the main idea that AI was going to come along and do a number on jobs. I believed that advancing Universal Basic Income was the best hope that we had of managing this transition. I wrote a book, The War on Normal People [ [link removed] ], making this case and then stumped around the country for months rousing millions of Americans. You might have been one of them.
How am I feeling now?
I’ve been reading a lot of the work compiled by the economist Molly Kinder [ [link removed] ], whom I recommend. She, like Clara Shih [ [link removed] ], believes that even if AI doesn’t wipe out all of the jobs, we are in for “a hard, messy period of concentrated pain with job losses clustered in specific, desirable jobs. . . the work that AI is most directly capable of replacing is cognitive work [ [link removed] ] performed at a computer - in offices and professional sectors. These are precisely the jobs that have grown the most as a share of the American labor force over the last fifty years.”
Here is one of her favorite charts, which shows the general trends in the types of work that most Americans do:
Farmers famously went from 40% of workers to 1% of workers in the last 140 years.
Office and administrative jobs peaked around 1980 and are now declining.
Services jobs peaked in 2015 or so and are now declining.
Meanwhile, professionals have grown to be almost half of all jobs. ‘Professionals’ is used very broadly in this particular study: it includes managers, marketers, business and finance operations, coders, mathematicians, architects, engineers, lawyers, teachers and educators, journalists, scientists, dietitians, doctors, nurses, health technicians, accountants, librarians, social workers, guidance counselors, artists and designers, actors, physical therapists, etc. You can see the source data here [ [link removed] ]. Pretty much anything that requires a college degree gets lumped into this category. College graduates are about 36% of the population of the U.S. and 45% of the workforce.
Molly describes this decades-long transformation of the labor market as increasing rewards for cognitive skill, accruing largely to college graduates. “First, agriculture collapses as a share of employment over a century. Blue-collar manufacturing rises and then falls. Office and administrative support rises and then drops. And through it all, professional and managerial work climbs steadily upward. The skill premium has been one of the most durable features of the modern economy.”
Molly then forecasts that AI is about to extract the premium from cognitive work. “If cognition itself becomes commoditized, the scarcity premium that has rewarded the college-educated knowledge class for generations starts to compress. The chart I keep staring at is the one I’d want to draw next: the same occupational clusters, projected forward, with the professional band starting to bend downward for the first time in a century . . . What we face is not a transition to a stable new shore. It is an economic transformation of historic scale, one that threatens the best jobs we have and the very notion of work as we know it.”
Yup. AI is going to sharply reduce the number of professionals in the economy. It’s starting with recent college graduates [ [link removed] ] and the rank-and-file of banks and tech firms [ [link removed] ], but it’s going to expand very quickly.
What do we do for a living? A lot of us think. The thinking is going to be done for us more and more by AI. Imagining that this won’t transform the nature of work is fanciful.
Molly is particularly concerned about clerical and backroom jobs that serve as paths to the middle class for millions. And, to her credit, she doesn’t think retraining is a viable solution for most workers.
How do I feel about the case I made back in 2020? It’s aged well. I wish I was wrong, but I don’t think I was. The question is what, if anything, are we going to do about it.
I’ve been interested in what we could do with money for a while now. For my interview with financial journalist Brendan Greeley on his book [ [link removed] ] “The Almighty Dollar: 500 Years of the World’s Most Powerful Money” click here [ [link removed] ]. To check out Forward Party candidates in your area, click here [ [link removed] ]. To get a copy of “Hey Yang, Where’s My Thousand Bucks?” click here [ [link removed] ] and use the code “UBIUBI” for 25% off. I’m doing a book talk [ [link removed] ] in LA on July 22nd. For 3 months off your mobile bill with Noble Mobile, click here [ [link removed] ] or email [email protected] [ mailto:[email protected] ] and use my name to switch or explore. Look up this summer.

Unsubscribe [link removed]?
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis