Good morning, and welcome to Broad + Liberty's Wednesday Weekly Reads!

As always, to stay up to date on late-breaking stories and analysis, subscribe to our daily email list and get the best of Broad + Liberty delivered straight to your inbox.

1. Minneapolis or Nashville — which path will Philly choose?

By Guy Ciarrocchi

Organized chaos in Minneapolis. It’s been in the spotlight — understandably. ICE raids. Protests. Confrontation. Deaths. 

Over 3,000 arrests and counting of known illegal immigrant murderers, rapists, kidnappers and child traffickers. The last part may be news to many because so much noise — mostly contrived — has been made about ICE that much of legacy news has “overlooked” what ICE has thankfully accomplished. 

We should never forget that if the protestors had their way — and those who fund and orchestrate their efforts — every single one of those 3,000-plus thugs would still be walking the streets. Where we live, work and our children play. 

Why It Matters. Compare this with Nashville, Tennessee. No national news stories about that Democrat-run city. No protests. No confrontations. No inquiries to ICE agents. And, thankfully, no deaths to civilians or agents.

Why? Because the mayor and his team respect the rule of law, public safety — and, accept the results of the 2024 election. Just as local law enforcement works with the FBI, DEA, the Coast Guard, state police and National Guard, Tennessee law enforcement is cooperating with ICE and CBP. This protects everyone’s rights, minimizes confrontation, and focuses on everyone’s safety.

As the focus on ICE intensifies, Parker, Shapiro and other politicians will have to chart their course. Nashville or Minneapolis? Virtue-signaling and grandstanding or common-sense governing?

Continue Reading

2. Krasner’s latest ploy — the ‘FAFO Coalition’

 

By Ben Mannes

 

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner escalated his public rhetoric over federal immigration authorities by unveiling a national coalition of like‑minded local prosecutors sharing the same donors, of whom he said are ready to charge federal officers they believe break state criminal laws while enforcing immigration policy. The move renewed questions about constitutional limits on local authority over federal agents and about the funding networks backing Krasner and his new political allies.

 

At a press conference in Center City, Krasner announced what he called the “FAFO collision,” a political and legal partnership with nine other elected prosecutors from jurisdictions that have clashed with federal immigration enforcement. The group publicly brands itself as “Fight Against Federal Overreach,” or FAFO, a name that also echoes a profane online slogan about the consequences of bad behavior that Krasner has used to “appear tough” in prior public remarks about law enforcement accountability.

Why It Matters. Krasner’s announcement comes amid a series of Philadelphia events in which he has vulgarly “warned” ICE and other federal agents they could be arrested if they commit what he deems crimes in the city, including a recent news conference condemning a fatal ICE shooting in Minneapolis. In that earlier appearance, he told agents who “come to Philly to commit crimes” to “get the F out of here” and vowed to charge any officer involved in a similar killing locally.

That tension — between local outrage over high‑profile enforcement incidents and the legal shield around federal authority — is at the center of Krasner’s campaign. Ironically, Article VI supremacy is the clause that enabled federal enforcement to the laws that ended a ban on gay marriage, slavery, and segregation. 

Continue Reading

3. Lightning Round

4. What we're reading

In The Federalist this week, Rachel Bovard asks, “What if I told you Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has the power and the votes — right now — to save Republicans’ congressional majorities, President Trump’s second-term agenda, and maybe the republic itself, all while poleaxing Democrats on the short side of an 84-15 issue?”

 

The issue to which she refers is voter identification — specifically the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require all Americans to prove their citizenship to be eligible to vote. It’s a simple idea — being a citizen is already a requirement for voting. So why do Senate Dems threaten to filibuster the bill? And why don’t Republicans call their bluff? This is an issue the vast majority of Americans agree about – the senator should debate it openly and let the people see where they stand.


 

Thank You

Broad + Liberty is funded by — and thankful for — readers like you.

Your generous support ensures that Broad + Liberty can bring you stories and opinions that Pennsylvania’s mainstream media would rather leave unheard. Fair coverage of the news and the publication of diverse opinions is more important than ever. Please consider making a contribution today. If you would like your gift to be used to help us cover a specific story or subject, please let us know in the contribution form or at [email protected].

 

As always, gifts made to Broad + Liberty are 100 percent tax deductible!

 

Thank you, dear reader, for your steadfast support of our independent, broad-minded brand of local journalism. We could not do this without you.

 

With gratitude,

 

— The Editors at Broad + Liberty

 

 

 

Support Broad + Liberty
Facebook
Twitter
Link
LinkedIn
YouTube
Copyright © 2026 Fideri News, All rights reserved.
You signed up for emails at OnPattison.com

Our mailing address is:
Fideri News
323 W Front St Fl 2
Media, PA 19063

Add us to your address book


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Broad and Liberty, Inc. is a Pennsylvania Domestic Nonprofit Corporation classifed as a public charity under Internal Revenue Code Section 501 (c) (3).

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp