 |
January 30, 2026 |
|
|
As this issue goes to publication, the US fiscal year (FY26) budget remains unresolved in the Senate, adding to uncertainty for global health funding. A short-term funding deal reached last night would delay, but not resolve, a potential government shutdown, as negotiations over the administration’s deadly mass deportation efforts continue. For global health programs already under strain, this limbo continues to carry serious consequences. This week’s issue tracks the expansion of the Global Gag Rule under the new “Promoting Human Flourishing in Foreign Assistance” (PHFFA) policy, the US’s formal withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO), growing pushback on concerning vaccine policy, and the new finding that nearly half of US CDC surveillance databases have been paused or stopped.
|
 |
Weaponizing Foreign Aid with the Expanded Global Gag Rule
Last Friday, the US administration expanded the harmful Global Gag Rule (GGR), also known as the Mexico City Policy, under a new Promoting Human Flourishing in Foreign Assistance policy, which broadens restrictions on US foreign aid. Originally enacted in 1984, the GGR barred non-US organizations receiving funding for global health from providing or promoting abortion services (even with their own, separate resources). Each Republican president enforced the GGR, while each Democratic president rescinded it. Now, this administration’s restrictions are being drastically expanded and extend to programs that engage in what the administration labels “gender ideology” and diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. It now applies not only to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) based abroad, but US NGOs, multilateral organizations and direct aid to foreign governments. Many organizations, including AVAC, Global Health Council, PAI, Planned Parenthood, Health GAP, and others called for the immediate rejection of the policy as weaponizing US foreign assistance and imposing political ideology at the expense of improving global health and international cooperation.
IMPLICATIONS: As this Think Global Health editorial from Stephanie Psaki states, “PHFFA applies not just to global health funding but to all non-military US foreign assistance, approximately $30 billion annually—or 50 times more than what was covered by the original Mexico City Policy… At best, the rules will waste US taxpayer dollars and impede the administration's ability to implement its America First Global Health Strategy. At worst, the policy will cost lives, stall progress against key global health challenges including HIV/AIDS, and further damage US credibility with key partners—particularly across Africa.” Our colleagues at KFF, provide a very useful analysis of this latest expansion here.
READ:
|
|
US Formally Notifies WHO of its Withdrawal
As this issue was going to publication last week, the US formally notified the World Health Organization (WHO) of its decision to withdraw. This triggered responses from WHO and the United Nations noting that the US was a founding member in 1948 and a central partner in major global health gains ever since, and warning that the US departure makes the US and the world less safe.
IMPLICATIONS: The US withdrawal from the WHO underscores a deeper shift in global health governance where health is a bargaining chip for a new imperialistic ideology around foreign policy and national interest. This move heightens, rather than diminishes, the importance of multilateral cooperation. As Chatham House Fellow, Ebere Okereke, writes in Think Global Health, the “US withdrawal from the WHO increased the relevance of multilateral cooperation for Africa. The WHO remains the primary source of global health norms and coordination, even in its weakened state. Disengagement would leave African countries more exposed to power-based bargaining during crises.”
READ:
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics Issues its Own Immunization Schedule
As US policy shifts and vaccine mis- and dis-information fuels mistrust and confusion—including this week’s chair of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) shockingly questioning longstanding recommendations for polio vaccination—many organizations are stepping up to defend vaccine science and evidence. The American Academy of Pediatrics issued its own 2026 immunization schedule, continuing to recommend routine vaccination against 18 diseases, a broader program of vaccine protection than the new schedule of vaccines released by the US administration a few weeks ago. The AAP’s recommendations are backed by numerous professional groups including the American Medical Association and National Medical Association. The Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) also launched an effort to boost evidence-based vaccine information by partnering with communicators and rapid-response teams to counter misinformation and clarify vaccine safety and effectiveness.
IMPLICATIONS: The AAP’s decision to publish its own comprehensive vaccine schedule, and the broad coalition endorsing it, signals a powerful pushback and commitment to evidence over ideology. This mixed guidance with the medical and scientific community differing from federal recommendations will continue to erode trust and will undermine routine immunization and confidence in public health, ultimately threatening the gains achieved against vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles, influenza, and polio.
READ:
|
|
Nearly Half of US CDC Surveillance Databases Stopped Updating
New research published in the Annals of Internal Medicine shows that nearly half of US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data systems have been paused. Of 82 databases meant to update monthly, 46% show unexplained pauses, most lasting six months or more, and of those paused, approximately 87% track vaccinations.
IMPLICATIONS: As Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) CEO Jeanne Marrazzo writes in an accompanying editorial, “Until the United States restores the CDC and its partner agencies to their former stature, we are not only flying blind in the face of emerging and reemerging threats to human health and well-being—we are being deprived of effective weaponry.”
READ:
|
|
|
You're receiving this because you signed up for our newsletter. Not interested any longer?
Manage email preferences | Unsubscribe
|
|
|
