The attorney general lays bare the plan to interfere with the midterms.

([link removed])

The nation has been convulsed by the shooting of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis. Millions now see with sickening clarity a lawless assault by federal officers on an American city and its people. As The Wall Street Journal editorialized, it is a “moral and political debacle for the Trump presidency.”

The videos were followed by a fusillade of lies

([link removed])

from senior government officials. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Pretti had engaged in “domestic terrorism.” White House aide Stephen Miller called Pretti an “assassin” who tried to “murder federal agents.” Border official Gregory Bovino declared, “This looks like a situation where an individual wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement.” The instant impulse by these high officials was to bully and smear.

Another outrageous statement by a cabinet official has not gotten enough attention.

On Saturday, Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote

([link removed])

to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz linking the violence in Minneapolis to a demand that the state give the Justice Department complete access to the state’s sensitive voter rolls, among other things. There’s no explicit quid pro quo offered — but anyone familiar with B-grade gangster movies won’t miss the implication. Certainly that’s how state officials have read it. Let that sink in: Federal agents have killed innocent civilians in cold blood. And the response of the attorney general of the United States is to use it as leverage to illegally access voter data. That is an unambiguous abuse of power.

As my colleague Wendy Weiser wrote

([link removed])

, “What do voter rolls have to do with ICE? Nothing. But they have a lot to do with the administration’s ongoing efforts to meddle in elections.”

Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon provided Bondi with the only legal and responsible answer (a simple “no

([link removed])

”), describing her offer as “an apparent ransom.”

Make no mistake: The federal government has no authorization to demand confidential voter information from the states. In our constitutional system, states are responsible for maintaining and protecting voter rolls. Indeed, various state and federal laws limit how much data the federal government can collect.

But that hasn’t stopped it from trying. Bondi’s Justice Department has demanded access

([link removed])

to the voter records of 44 states and Washington, DC, and it has sued more than 20 states for not complying. Two courts have already ruled on the side of the states.

Why would the administration want to hoover up this data? It would give election deniers new ammunition to push false claims of voting by people who are not U.S. citizens. It would help the federal government pressure states into reckless voter purges, which would kick eligible citizens off the rolls just as November comes around.

Plainly, it’s all part of a broader strategy to meddle with our elections. Last weekend, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are looking into yet another version of the unpopular SAVE Act — the bill that would require American citizens to produce a birth certificate, passport, or similar document to register to vote. At least 21 million Americans lack ready access to those documents, according to our research. The bill narrowly passed the House but stalled in the Senate last year after massive public pushback.

Bondi’s letter is a gross escalation of this effort — an explicit abuse of this moment to coerce Minnesota to step into line.

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) worries that this escalation is by design. Over the weekend, he warned that the “Trump administration is creating this mayhem, particularly in cities in swing states, in order to take control of the election.”

When Donald Trump took office the first time in 2017, he talked of “American carnage.” Shooting of bystanders, squads of masked armed men, terrorized immigrants, clouds of tear gas, vague claims of conspiracy, and more — all bring that “carnage” to life. That sense of crisis, consciously instigated, can create opportunities to undermine the election and sow doubt and division.

To be clear (and I get asked this a lot): Donald Trump cannot cancel the midterms. Presidents have no power to do that.

But this armed assault on a major American city, coupled with a thuggish offer implying that the bully boys might be pulled back if state officials will betray their voters, shows the damage that can be done nonetheless.

The dignified and angry public response from around the country to the latest killing suggests maybe something has snapped. It would not be the first time in our history that government violence kindled an even more powerful reaction.

It’s not only the safety and sanity of people in Minnesota that’s at stake. As we are reminded once again, our democracy is on the line.

Defending Military and Overseas Voters’ Access to the Ballot

The Brennan Center and co-counsel filed a friend-of-the-court brief in a Supreme Court case that could end a century-old election practice and threaten the voting rights of millions of Americans. In Watson v. Republican National Committee, the justices are considering a challenge to Mississippi’s “grace period” law, one of similar laws in 30 states that allow election officials to count mail ballots that are postmarked by Election Day and received within a few days. These grace periods are especially important for members of the military and other Americans living overseas. Striking down these laws “ignores the clear text of the federal laws and history of state ballot-counting practices,” Andrew Garber, Justin Lam, and Covington & Burling’s Clemencia Garcia-Kasimirowski write. Read more

([link removed])

Shifts in the State Voting Laws Landscape

In 2025, state legislators enacted at least 31 laws restricting access to the ballot, all but one of which will be in effect for the 2026 midterms. It’s the first time in five years that states have enacted more laws restricting voting access than expanding it. The new State Voting Laws Roundup, co-produced by the Brennan Center and UC Berkeley’s Goldman School of Public Policy, recaps trends in last year’s voting legislation and previews changes in election laws we could see this year. Read more

([link removed])

Reducing Sexual Violence in Prisons

Federal funding cuts are hindering decades-long, bipartisan efforts to curb sexual abuse in prisons. “Both federal cuts and recent directives have made it harder to implement the Prison Rape Elimination Act and will potentially cause confusion among correctional facilities about whether the law remains in force or what it now requires,” write Josephine Wonsun Hahn and Tiffany Sanabia. Read more

([link removed])





Podcast

Fighting Corruption

([link removed])

Americans have connected the dots: Corruption and self-dealing at the highest levels have led to voters feeling left out, left behind, and disconnected from government. What could solve the problem? The Brennan Center has begun publishing a series of policy solutions, starting with “Nine Solutions for Corruption in America

([link removed])

.” Watch or listen as Michael Waldman talks to top pollster Celinda Lake and Daniel Weiner on YouTube

([link removed])

// Spotify

([link removed])

// Apple

([link removed])

// SUBSTACK

([link removed])





News

Joseph Nunn on the legal barriers to invoking the Insurrection Act // THE NEW REPUBLIC

([link removed])

Eileen O’Connor on the Justice Department’s lawsuits over voter files // LAIST

([link removed])

Eric Petry on the harms of dark money in elections // AKRON BEACON JOURNAL

([link removed])

Marina Pino on megadonors’ increasing influence on state politics // SANTA FE NEW MEXICAN

([link removed])

Feedback on this newsletter? Email us at [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]







([link removed])

Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law

120 Broadway, Suite 1750, New York, NY 10271

646-292-8310

tel:646-292-8310

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Support the Brennan Center

[link removed]

View Online

[link removed]

Want to change how you receive these emails or unsubscribe? Click here

[link removed]

to update your preferences.

([link removed])

([link removed])

([link removed])

([link removed])

([link removed])

([link removed])

([link removed])

([link removed])

([link removed])