A journalist at Fox News in Wisconsin contacted me today with a statement from Ridglan Farms, the notorious animal testing facility that has been implicated in hundreds of counts of felony animal abuse. Apparently, in the wake of my recent blogs advocating for an immediate rescue of Ridglan’s dogs, the company is trying to call on its corrupt connections to law enforcement to defend its criminal enterprise. But their statement is filled with absurdities and errors. For that reason, I’m pasting below an annotated version for this audience’s education—and entertainment. Ridglan’s press release is pulled out in block quotes. My comments are in italics.
It’s interesting that Ridglan has retained a Texas PR company to handle its communications—and one that may have been involved in Texas A&M’s failed and unconstitutional efforts to crush dissent on its own abusive dog experiments.
Sadly, this headline already gives away that the Feds probably did not respond. The last thing they’d want, if they were actually doing an investigation, is for the targets of the investigation to be aware that it’s happening. This is unfortunate because the last time,the FBI got involved in prosecuting animal rescue, it became one of the most viral stories in animal rights history.
The “health studies” at issue include things like injecting dogs with rabies to make a new vaccine that’s medically unnecessary, force-feeding artificial sweeteners to dogs to the point that their testicles shrink, and all manner of other experiments that hardly have anything to do with health at all.
I was very happy to see my blog linked. It’ll help SEO and traffic to the page. But on the substance, there are so many things wrong here. The first is that no “mass trespassing and theft” was announced. Distinguished legal scholars, and indeed the prior case at Ridglan, show that removing the dogs would be an exercise in our right to rescue. Here’s more about our legal right to rescue. Second, I actually expect that we won’t face legal charges, though I wish we would. District Attorney Izmael Ozanne, who ignored our legal complaints for years, has become the laughingstock of his county partly because he pursued stupid cases such as our prior rescue. We can hope that he’ll make the same mistake again. But, sadly, I don’t think we can expect it because he is not that dumb.
I’ve never seen my CV set out so nicely. Well done, Ridglan!
The company forgot to mention one important point: despite blatant corruption in his investigative process, the special prosecutor still found evidence of hundreds of counts of felony animal abuse. The company vet’s license was taken away. The state inspection referred their case for criminal prosecution. And the only reason it was not charged was because it voluntarily agreed to shut down.
The company keeps referring to life-saving research but can’t actually cite any examples. And our efforts to save the dogs are not a result of a legal outcome we disagree with. They’re the result of an illegal process that has concluded with thousands of dogs facing imminent torture and death. Attorney Eric MeLeod, incidentally, is a notorious, right-wing attorney who is apparently disliked by many people throughout Dane County. Former employees have passed along that he is an angry, hateful man. It’s no surprise that his one statement in Ridglan’s document is a threat to incur “extensive legal fees.” Sadly, though he may not realize this, defendants in the US have the right to counsel if they can’t afford it.
This image is supposed to look good for them?
They once again forgot the part of the hundreds of counts of felony animal abuse. I’ll have much more to say about this development, and the continuing fight to free the Ridglan dogs. But make sure you sign up for our next legal briefing if you want to find out more—and help us save the Ridglan dogs. Thank you for reading The Simple Heart! To help us reach more people, become a donor today. |