UK to protect lobsters from pain, but not unborn babies in abortions
In late December, the UK government announced plans to ban traditional methods used by chefs and others to kill lobsters and crabs in the cooking process. The proposal forms part of the Labour Party’s new animal welfare crackdown The ban will not stop with lobsters and crabs. It will also apply to shrimp, prawns, squid, and octopus - species officially recognised as “sentient beings capable of experiencing pain and suffering” in 2022 by the previous Conservative government. The announcement has sparked fierce backlash from restauranteurs, who argue the move will drive up costs and effectively end the sale of live shellfish. David Jarrad, chief executive of the Shellfish Association of Great Britain, warned that customers simply won’t pay premium prices for shellfish that arrive already dead. Yet beyond the economic and practical implications lies a deeper moral question. Many of the same politicians enthusiastically supporting this ban have consistently rejected proposals to offer precautionary pain relief to unborn babies during late-term abortions. To many observers, this reveals a striking inconsistency in how suffering is acknowledged and prioritised - and the profound disregard shown toward unborn human babies. This ethical disconnect was similarly evident in Ireland shortly before Christmas. In the Dáil, some TDs voted to ban fox hunting, citing animal welfare concerns, having voted minutes earlier to progress a Private Members’ Bill that would allow abortion on request up to birth. |