Once a rising political reporter, Nuzzi debuts her book amid claims from an ex that she betrayed sources and blurred ties with RFK Jr. and others Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
Poynter.
The Poynter Report With Senior Media Writer Tom Jones
 

OPINION

 

Critics pan Olivia Nuzzi’s memoir as her media saga widens

Olivia Nuzzi, shown here in 2023. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Up until now, I haven’t written too much about the gossipy, soap-opera scandal that has been buzzing around the media world.

It involves journalists Olivia Nuzzi and Ryan Lizza.

Let’s see if I can give you the background quickly.

The two were once in a relationship and were the talk of Washington, D.C.’s spicy political circles. Nuzzi was the wunderkind who wrote well-received, insider-type profiles at places such as Vanity Fair, New York magazine and The Daily Beast. Lizza, 18 years her senior, had a resume that included work at places such as New York, The New Yorker, CNN and Politico.

But then a year ago, their personal and professional lives blew up.

Their relationship ended after it was learned that Nuzzi had an inappropriate personal (but not physical, both involved parties allege) relationship with someone she had covered: none other than former Republican presidential candidate and future Trump cabinet member Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Her close connection to RFK Jr. ultimately cost Nuzzi her job at New York magazine. Things later got really messy when Nuzzi filed a restraining order against Lizza, claiming he was harassing and blackmailing her. She later withdrew the order.

And we all figured that was pretty much the end of the drama.

Turns out, it wasn’t even close.

Over the past year, Nuzzi has been working on a memoir, which came out Tuesday. More on that in a moment. In the meantime, over the past couple of weeks, Lizza has taken to Substack to make explosive allegations against Nuzzi, including what he claims are extremely personal text messages between Nuzzi and RFK Jr., as well as allegations that Nuzzi also had an affair with another politician she wrote about: former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford.

In addition, Lizza claims Nuzzi was, essentially, working as a political operative for RFK.

Social media and the gossip pages ate it up.

Status’ Oliver Darcy wrote, “Of course, while the salacious details of Washington's version of a Bravo-style reality show have generated the most attention and inspired an avalanche of tabloid headlines, Lizza has also credibly accused Nuzzi of serious journalistic transgressions. His third entry, published last week ahead of the holiday, specifically focused on a number of ethical breaches Nuzzi allegedly committed, including betraying confidential sources in service of alerting Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to would-be saboteurs in his midst.”

As I said, other than sharing the occasional links, I’ve avoided writing too much. For one, this feels like inside baseball. In other words, those deeply ingrained in media coverage know who these people are, but does anyone else know? And do they care?

In addition, the most scandalous parts of all this — and the parts that raise the most serious questions about journalism ethics — have come from Substack posts written by, some might suggest, a jilted ex-lover who is looking to drum up interest in his subscription-based newsletter. That’s not to say what Lizza wrote is true or false. Who knows what is true or false in all this mess?

So why am I writing about this now?

Well, mostly because Nuzzi’s book — “American Canto” — came out Tuesday and the reviews are noteworthy and, for the most part, scathing.

The Washington Post’s Becca Rothfeld wrote, “A public hungry for scandal might be more satisfied if ‘American Canto’ were uniformly excellent or uniformly terrible. But in our unsatisfying reality, it is what most debut books are: highly uneven and largely forgettable. To be sure, vast swaths of it are impressively and aggressively awful.”

The New York Times’ Alexandra Jacobs wrote, “Amid the noise around Nuzzi, ‘American Canto’ itself drops with a soft, disappointing thud.”

The Atlantic’s Helen Lewis wrote, “‘American Canto’ is Nuzzi’s attempt to elevate a grubby affair to the status of the mythic, to transmute the base metal of Page Six sexting stories into the gold of literary reflections on the political moment.”

Lewis added, “But all the surf and smoke and Didionesque stylings in the world cannot disguise the central problem with American Canto: It is not honest. In the book, Nuzzi rails against those who urge her to tell all. ‘I do not wish to be understood,’ she writes, ‘which no one seems to understand.’ This is a very good reason not to write and publish a memoir.”

The New Yorker’s Molly Fischer wrote, “Amid the tumult of gossip, ‘American Canto’ arrives as a peculiar artifact. It refuses chronology and coherence, which makes it a challenge to extract answers to any of the many questions a reader loosely aware of her story might have.”

What is actually in the book? The Washington Post’s Sophia Nguyen offers some insight with “4 takeaways from Olivia Nuzzi’s memoir.”

We’ll see where this story goes from here. Semafor’s Max Tani and others have reported that Nuzzi is likely out at Vanity Fair.

Meanwhile, Nuzzi commented publicly for the first time Tuesday about Lizza’s four-part Substack series, which seemed intended to torpedo Nuzzi’s career.

Nuzzi told Emily Sundberg’s “Feed Me” Substack, “The allegations, made by a man I met when I was 19 years old, are another attempt to harass, humiliate, and harm me until I am as destroyed as he seems to be. It is abuse that I am all too familiar with now relocated to the public square and dressed up as some sort of noble crusade. To that point: If he possessed any explosive information in the public interest, the only responsible way to handle that information would be to quietly pass it off to an outlet free of his conflicts; there is no glory in that, though, and no subscribers. This obsessive and violating fan fiction-slash-revenge porn he has written would never meet standards for publication at any legitimate outlet.”

Later, Nuzzi appeared on Tim Miller’s xxxxxx podcast for an interview that Status’ Oliver Darcy called “largely sympathetic.”

Darcy added, “Miller did, however, press her on why she didn’t speak out during Kennedy’s confirmation hearing — a question she never fully answered, reiterating only that she has shared everything she felt she could ‘responsibly’ share. At one point, as Miller continued questioning her, Nuzzi broke down in tears and the interview was paused for an unspecified period before resuming. Miller eventually closed the conversation by endorsing her book and encouraging listeners to buy it. Alrighty, then! In the comments, xxxxxx fans showed some frustration with Miller over the interview.”

And finally, let’s leave the Nuzzi-Lizza story for now with this perceptive column by Mediaite’s Colby Hall: “Ryan Lizza Turned Olivia Nuzzi Breakup Series Into Revenge Porn Disguised as Journalism.”

Making their pitch

Netflix, Paramount and Comcast all submitted second-round bids this week in their efforts to land a big fish: Warner Bros. Discovery.

Axios’ Sara Fischer reports, “Paramount was seen as an early front-runner after WBD announced it was formally open to a possible sale, but the narrative has changed in recent days. Netflix, sources say, has touted its access to capital, as well as having access to ‘clean money’ in the wake of reports that suggest other bidders may be in talks with Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds to finance their offers.”

However, CNN’s Brian Stelter wrote, “Netflix and Comcast are reportedly only interested in Warner's studio and streaming businesses. Paramount remains the only known bidder that wants all of WBD, including CNN.”

Any acquisition is going to have to get regulatory approval from the Trump administration.

The Wall Street Journal’s Joe Flint, Lauren Thomas and Dave Michaels reported, “Some officials at the Justice Department are concerned that Netflix owning HBO Max would give it too much power in the streaming marketplace, a person familiar with their thinking said. The department’s antitrust division, which is responsible for reviewing deals, hasn’t formally evaluated a potential transaction. There was also a recent meeting of high-level White House officials in which concerns about a Netflix-Warner Discovery deal were discussed, according to people familiar with the matter.”

Fischer, however, wrote for Axios, “All bids are likely to receive regulatory scrutiny, although antitrust experts don't believe it would be impossible for any of the three suitors to prevail, should the DOJ sue to block a deal.”

Reports are that Warner Bros. Discovery hopes to reach a decision by the end of the year.

Social media frenzy

President Donald Trump, right, next to Secretary of State Marco Rubio during a cabinet meeting on Tuesday. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

Mediaite’s David Gilmour noted that President Donald Trump fired off more than 160 posts on his Truth Social in just five hours late Monday night. Gilmour wrote, “From 7 p.m. to nearly midnight (ET), the president reposted an endless stream of clips, some of which were duplicated in what appeared to be an automatic loop, amplifying MAGA-friendly pundits and conspiracy theories. The torrent swung between nostalgia — including a ‘Make Christmas Great Again’ video featuring Trump’s cameo in ‘Home Alone 2’ — and a parade of attacks on his usual Democratic targets, from California Governor Gavin Newsom and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and former President Barack Obama.”

That’s just a small sample of the posts. BuzzFeed called Trump’s Truth Social activity a “meltdown” that included “truly unhinged conspiracies.”

Then early Tuesday morning — 5:48 a.m. Eastern, to be exact — Trump posted, “TRUTH SOCIAL IS THE BEST! There is nothing even close!!!”

Staying up and getting up early might have taken a bit of a toll on the president. Some on social media pointed out that Trump appeared a bit sleepy during parts of his cabinet meeting on Tuesday.

Pushing back

As I’ve written about a couple of times now in this newsletter, the White House has launched a website that calls out what the Trump administration believes is “fake news.” The blaring headline across the top reads, “Misleading. Biased. Exposed.” The site then goes on to list the news outlets, reporters and stories the Trump administration, essentially, disagrees with.

The Society of Professional Journalists is pushing back. It sent a letter to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt that expresses “deep concern” about the page, and it is encouraging the Trump administration to take it down.

The letter, in part, says, “SPJ recognizes that there can be, at times, a contentious relationship between journalists and those in power. This is a sign of a healthy democratic state wherein freedom of speech and freedom of the press are respected and journalists fulfill their role of holding power to account. But there are well-established ways of resolving disagreements over the fairness or accuracy of stories. For journalists, they include offering the right of reply, publishing a correction in the case of errors and, if necessary, publishing an apology.”

It later reads, “However, this should not be done via a page on the website of the highest office in the country that denigrates and attacks reporters, categorizing their work as ‘lies,’ ‘left-wing lunacy,’ and ‘malpractice,’ among other ‘categories.’ By publishing reporters’ names, outlets and specific stories, the White House is naming and shaming members of the press in a highly charged political and social environment. On top of the potential chilling effect of the Administration’s action on coverage, SPJ regards this as a form of online harassment that exposes members of the media to potential online or offline threats and even violence.”

It goes on to say, “SPJ believes that civility must be restored to the relationship between the media and the Administration. A first step would be to remove this page and lower the temperature in exchanges between administration officials and journalists. We welcome the opportunity to meet with you and President Trump, along with anyone else in the Administration, to discuss a smoother path forward for the sake of democracy, something we all want to preserve and protect.”

Q&A of the day

New York Times executive editor Joe Kahn sat down with Patrick Healy, assistant managing editor for standards and trust at the Times, to talk about the publication’s news coverage. Healy asked Times readers to submit questions and used those contributions, as well as his own questions, to get Kahn’s thoughts on such news topics as Donald Trump, the rapid change in China, reporting without a personal point of view, artificial intelligence and what’s most on Kahn’s mind these days.

It’s an interesting and transparent look into the coverage of The New York Times.

Kahn told Healy, “The most challenging part of the job is producing an independent news report when some readers really want a more partisan one. We’re committed to independent journalism, unencumbered by ties to political parties, government, corporations or private interests, at a time when partisanship seems more intense than ever. Our readers of course have their own beliefs and loyalties, and some want to see more coverage that aligns with their views. To practice independent journalism, you need a thick skin. I believe most readers appreciate the need for independent journalism in a democracy. Democracies rely on a common base of facts and understanding of the news, and they need news sources respected by rival sides. But that’s not always the message we’re hearing from the loudest critics.”

Staying put

 
ESPN’s Paul Finebaum, shown here in 2024. (AP Photo/Jeffrey McWhorter)

For a few moments there, following the shooting death of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, ESPN college football personality Paul Finebaum flirted with the idea of running for the U.S. Senate as a Republican in Alabama. At the time, Finebaum told Outkick that the murder of Kirk prompted him to think about public service.

But on Tuesday, Finebaum told AL.com in a statement that he would not run for Senate.

Finebaum said, “I have been deeply moved by so many people in Alabama who have reached out encouraging me to run for the United States Senate. It has been a gratifying and rewarding experience. I am also appreciative of my bosses at ESPN for allowing me to explore this opportunity. But it’s time for me to devote my full attention to something everyone in Alabama can agree upon — our love of college football.”

Finebaum, whose special expertise is in college football (particularly the Southeastern Conference), was a longtime columnist at the Birmingham Post-Herald, and also hosted a sports-talk radio show in Birmingham before jumping to ESPN in 2013.

Inside sports

This item is of particular interest to sports fans and those who follow sports media. According to The Athletic’s Andrew Marchand, Craig Carton is returning to New York’s legendary WFAN radio for the third time.

Carton’s story is an interesting one. He once co-hosted perhaps the biggest local sports-talk radio show in the country, WFAN’s morning show with former NFL quarterback Boomer Esiason. But in 2017, Carton was arrested by federal agents on charges of wire and securities fraud. He was sentenced to 42 months in prison. After serving a little more than a year, Carton returned to WFAN for his second stint there.

Then two years ago, Fox Sports 1 hired Carton to host a morning TV sports show, but poor ratings led to FS1 blowing up much of its daytime schedule, and that included letting go of Carton.

Now Marchand reports Carton will return early next year as co-host in the afternoon drive.

Media tidbits

  • Around 87% of Los Angeles Times Guild members ratified a new labor contract with the paper owned by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, ending a three-year labor dispute. The result will be thousands of dollars in raises for union members. The Hollywood Reporter’s Katie Kilkenny has the details.
  • Variety’s Brian Steinberg with “NBC News Launches Ad-Free Subscription Streaming Service Offering ‘Dateline,’ ‘Today,’ Podcasts, More.”
  • Media Matters’ Matt Gertz with “Scrounging for a Hegseth defense, right-wing commentators seize on NY Times report.”
  • NPR’s David Folkenflik with “Fox News faces critical test in 2nd case over false 2020 election claims.”
  • NBC News’ Juliette Arcodia and David K. Li with “Megan Thee Stallion wins defamation suit against blogger.”
  • The Washington Post’s Leo Sands with “‘Franklin the Turtle’ publisher slams Hegseth post joking about boat strike.”
  • Have you ever noticed that the official logo of Poynter includes a period after the word Poynter? What’s the deal with that? There’s no one better to explain it than my longtime Poynter colleague Roy Peter Clark: “Poynter’s logo almost looked very different. Here’s how we landed on the dot.”

Hot type

  • Just one item here today because you’ll want to spend some time with it: “Associated Press 100 Photos of 2025: AP photos that defined the year.”

More resources for journalists

  • Experienced leaders: Amplify your managerial strengths, navigate ethical decision-making and strategize ahead of difficult conversations. Space is limited. Apply by Jan. 23.
  • Interested in learning more about funding local news? Start here.
  • Get the critical skills new managers need to help forge successful paths to leadership in journalism, media and technology. Apply now.
  • Gain the skills to spot AI risks like bias, misinformation and hallucinations before they harm your work. Enroll now.

Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at [email protected].

The Poynter Report is your daily dive into the world of media, packed with the latest news and insights. Get it delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday by signing up here. And don’t forget to tune into our biweekly podcast for even more.

Poynter.
Support the journalism that keeps you informed.
GIVE NOW
 
ADVERTISE // DONATE // LEARN // JOBS
Did someone forward you this email? Sign up here.
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram Reply
Poynter.
The Craig Newmark Center For Ethics and Leadership
International Fact-Checking Network
MediaWise
PolitiFact
© All rights reserved Poynter Institute 2025
801 Third Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701

If you don't want to receive email updates from Poynter, we understand.
You can change your subscription preferences or unsubscribe from all Poynter emails.