View this email in your web browser

Subscribe to this newsletter

December 2, 2025

 
 

Share This Newsletter

U.S. POLICY BEAT

Employment Verification: The Next Front for U.S. Immigration Enforcement?

By Muzaffar Chishti and Colleen Putzel-Kavanaugh

E-Verify has been heralded as a key way to control unauthorized immigration to the United States, but federal efforts to expand the system have stalled. The Trump administration has not given the E-Verify program the same level of attention as other immigration enforcement efforts.

However, states have increased their use of employment verification. And temporary statuses that conveyed work authorization for many unauthorized immigrants are ending, in the process confusing employers and workers alike. That could create new pressure for federal action.

This article details the history and challenges of E-Verify, and its limited uptake.

 
A person uses a digital tool to screen a job applicant.
 
EDITOR'S NOTE

This month marks 75 years since the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) was founded. The agency was born from the ashes of World War II with a mandate “of seeking permanent solutions for the problem of refugees,” focused at first on the massive, war-related displacement in Europe. It would be several months until the United Nations adopted the 1951 Refugee Convention, which would become the centerpiece of the modern legal approach to protecting displaced people.

In the decades since its founding, UNHCR has seen its role expand considerably, as displacement increased and the global community rallied to expand protection. What started as primarily a Europe-focused organization became a global one. As former colonies gained their independence, the Soviet Union dissolved, and the drivers of migration became more complex, UNHCR was often there to shelter displaced people, assist their return home when the time came, and in some cases help their resettlement to a new home far away.

In the process, UNHCR became one of the largest UN agencies, with a multibillion-dollar annual budget.

The agency was twice awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, in 1954 and 1981, and is one of only two recipients to have received the award multiple times (the International Committee of the Red Cross has won three times). Of course, it has also come under criticism, from restrictionists and refugee advocates alike, who have alternatingly claimed the group has facilitated irregular migration and been complicit in human-rights abuses, among other charges.

Meanwhile, the number of people forced out of their homes has grown considerably, from about 2 million in 1951 to 21 million in 2000 and 143 million this year (although a significant share of this growth may simply reflect the increased ability to count people; the recent figures include both international and internal displacement). Still, for the first time in years, the number of displaced people globally shrank in 2025, largely due to returns to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Syria, Sudan, and Afghanistan.

At the moment, UNHCR finds itself in a difficult position. Due to international aid cuts, the agency is on pace to end 2025 with just three-quarters of last year’s budget, dropping it to the funding level of a decade ago. As a result, nearly 5,000 staffers had lost their jobs as of October.

At the same time, some world leaders have proposed reconsidering the international human-rights framework upon which UNHCR and other agencies operate. The United States may be leading a charge to revisit the 1951 Refugee Convention and several EU Member States have called for rewriting or reinterpreting some European Convention on Human Rights prohibitions on returns or on limiting asylum.

When awarding UNHCR its first Peace Prize back in 1954, the Nobel Committee chairman framed the high odds the organization was up against: “Until the camps are cleared, until the sick and old have been cared for, until the young people and the children have been educated and trained for a profession or trade, the refugee problem is not solved.”

Regardless of the present political and financial challenges UNHCR is confronting, those words remain as relevant as ever.

All the best,

Julian Hattem
Editor, Migration Information Source
[email protected]

Follow MPI

NEW FROM MPI

Security Reforms in Ecuador Should Not Be the Last Word
By Diego Chaves-González

Las reformas en materia de seguridad en Ecuador deben representar un primer paso, no el último
Por Diego Chaves-González

UPCOMING EVENTS
DID YOU KNOW?

"Mobile technologies have unquestionably made it easier for migrants to plan their journeys, form bonds, and reduce the costs of travel."

 

"Scholars have categorized visual representations of irregular and humanitarian migration into two dominant themes: the threat discourse, portraying immigration as a challenge to security or stability, and the humanitarian discourse, emphasizing migrants’ harsh conditions and misery."

 

 "Between 2010 and 2022, the Afghan immigrant population nearly quadrupled, from approximately 54,000 to 195,000, while the overall U.S. immigrant population grew by 16 percent.'"

 

MEDIA CORNER

Making Americans: Plyler v. Doe and Opening the School Door, by Jessica Lander, provides the history of the landmark 1982 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that affirmed the right of all children, regardless of immigration status, to public education.

In Darker Shade of Pale: Shtetl to Colony, sociologist Deborah Posel traces the historical migration of Jewish families from the Russian Empire to South Africa at the turn of the 20th century.

A wide-ranging, interdisciplinary collection of border studies analysis comes together in Mexico-U.S., Serbia-EU Border Lives and Works, edited by Marina Lažetić, Carrie Preston, and Muhammad Zaman.

Sociologist Emily Walton details certain U.S. communities’ demographic transition following the arrival of mostly well-educated, non-White immigrants, in Homesick: Race and Exclusion in Rural New England.

Families and Migration: Examining the Causes, Processes, and Consequences of Migration, edited by Josip Obradović and Sampson Lee Blair, provides a broad, global overview of migration’s impact on families.

Peter Mancina’s On the Side of ICE: Policing Immigrants in a Sanctuary State explores how state and local authorities assist federal immigration enforcement in the United States.

 

The Migration Information Source is a publication of the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank in Washington, DC, and is dedicated to providing fresh thought, authoritative data, and global analysis of international migration and refugee trends.

Copyright © 2025 Migration Policy Institute. All Rights Reserved.
1275 K St. NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC xxxxxx

Unsubscribe or Manage Your Preferences