| Please consider adding [email protected] to your address book, which
will ensure that our messages reach you and not your spam box!
Read and share online:
https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2025-support-the-Lab.
Dear Free Software Supporter,
From the Free Software Foundation's (FSF) earliest efforts protecting
user freedom to the formation of the Licensing and Compliance Lab (the
Lab) in 2001 and beyond, the tactics and methods used to keep the GNU
project and the GNU General Public License (GPL) strong for software
freedom have been consistent. We have software freedom today because
of the deliberate efforts of our predecessors, but to quote the
memorable original Star Trek character, Dr. Leonard "Bones" McCoy,
"All right, it's worked so far, but we're not out yet." From copyright
and compliance to education and support, our tried and proven work
continues, and we will not stop fulfilling our mission to promote and
defend users' rights to use, study, copy, modify, and distribute
software.
GNU copyright and GPL enforcement
Dr. McCoy's quote probably applies to a all aspects of the FSF's work,
but it especially encapsulates our work on GNU copyright and GPL
compliance. Software freedom has survived and thrived over the last 40
years, but what about the next 40? What about today? To be certain our
course is still steady, the Lab has been discussing the value of
copyright assignment in different forums over the last year, with both
legal professionals and in the community at large to see if the GPL
enforcement landscape has changed. Generally speaking, not much has
changed, especially for a couple of steadfast approaches to protecting
free software. First, projects are still in the strongest legal
position to enforce a GPL violation if the project has a single
copyright holder through developers assigning copyright for their code
contributions. This approach is what enables the copyright holder of a
project to confidently enforce a license on behalf of its contributors
and empowers the FSF to enforce the GPL on behalf of GNU. Because we
know that copyright assignment works for keeping software free, we
continue to promote its use over a Developer Certificate of Origin
(DCO), permissively licensed code, and the public domain for
contributions.
Second, the most effective means to prevent an employer from making a
claim on a contributors work (if the contributor is employed to
program) is with an employer disclaimer. With a disclaimer in place,
contributions to GNU (or any other project that uses copyright
assignment) are more secured against a claim by an employer. Copyright
assignment is a strategy that has worked well to protect free
software, and should not be abandoned or diluted. "It's worked so far,
but we're not out yet." Yeah, Bones, we hear you.
Protecting the GNU General Public License
When a program is licensed under a GNU GPL, it is frequently
recognized and it is understood what freedoms are guaranteed with the
license; however, there is a growing trend where this affiliation is
being exploited and abused. We call this freewashing. Freewashing is
sometimes purposeful, sometimes a simple misunderstanding, but
regardless of the intent, it is confusing to the public. The Lab has
been busy resolving confusing licenses involving a GPL with two
new cases since this summer, ten currently open cases, and three
successful resolutions. We receive a lot of reports from people being
confused if they can rely on their rights under the GPL when projects
alter the license with further restrictions or make erroneous
statements about how it should be applied. The FSF is not interested
in using our rights to bring an iron fist down upon a project. Yes, we
enforce our rights, but we also want projects to join us in embracing
software freedom for the greater good of all. This is the good fight,
and it is with your contributions that we are able to continue this
work.
Educating the community
The Lab does a lot of other important work outside of GPL stewardship
and enforcement. We work hard to educate and support members of
the free software community and the world at large. In the last year,
we answered over 150 emails sent to [email protected] with questions
about free software licensing. Although we receive questions from
several sources, most are individual members of the free software
community seeking to better understand the GPL and free software
licensing. The Lab, and its amazing licensing volunteers, provide this
service for free, which if given a monetary value could amount to
hundreds of dollars per inquiry. Although it is not legal advice, it
is a consultation with the preeminent resource of free licensing for
free software developers. Not only does this directly help the free
software community, it provides our licensing volunteers with the
opportunity for a rigorous exercise in emerging licensing issues of
the modern day. This, in turn, strengthens volunteer's knowledge of
free software licensing making them a greater asset to the movement as
a whole. Only with your support, we can continue this work. Please
consider supporting us today and bringing us closer to our fundraising
goal!
Furthering the goal of education and support from the Lab, both myself
and licensing and compliance manager Krzysztof Siewicz gave multiple
talks about, and hosted panels, on free software licensing at events
such as: LinuxFest Northwest, Jesień Linuksowa, GNU
Cauldron, Teardown, and Hackers Of Planet Earth (HOPE).
Even when we weren't able to give a talk on free software, we were
able to table at events including All Things Open and SeaGL.
Tabling is an important, and often first, introduction to free
software and why its important for a free and just society.
Verification and certification
In addition to all the work we do with compliance, stewardship, and
education, we still find time to grow the Free Software Directory
(FSD). At HOPE in New York I hosted a workshop on determining a
programs' licensing and adding it to the FSD. The FSD is more than
just a catalog of free software, it is an introduction to newcomers,
and a powerful educational platform for those wishing to strengthen
the community of free software. It is also a neutral community
platform where projects can receive feedback from the public. Every
week the Lab gives three hours of focused time to help people learn
how to evaluate a program's licensing, so please join us every Friday
from 12:00-15:00 EST (17:00 to 20:00 UTC) in the Libera.Chat #fsf
channel. It requires self-direction, but it also puts an enabled
reviewer in a better position to help small projects with their
licensing, making the free software movement stronger, one project at
a time.
A major way the Lab is able to continue our work is through donations
from supporters like you. Please take a moment to reflect on the value
the Lab brings to the community through free software licensing
education, upholding the GNU GPL, and defending GNU. We are filled
with gratitude for the successes over these last forty years, and we
promise to continue the fight so that countless hours of work by our
predecessors for software freedom will not be in vain. Remember, "It
has worked so far, but we're not out yet." Please consider
donating today or becoming an associate member and help us
reach our fundraising goal of $400,000 USD by January 1, 2026?
Yours in freedom,
Craig Topham
Copyright & Licensing Associate
|