Wall Street is the ultimate NIMBY, demanding a focus on maximizing price over volume. Public homebuilders achieve this in part through “land banking,” wielding their capital advantages to control large shares of land. This strategy favors well-capitalized builders and institutional buyers — think publicly traded companies, think oligarchic private equity — over mom-and-pops.
The paper concludes with an extensive menu of policy recommendations for Congress, federal agencies, and state and local governments. These include: -
Expanding lending to local homebuilders
- Adopting a land-value tax to discourage land hoarding
- Banning corporate ownership of single-family homes and mandating divestiture
-
Enabling more scrutiny of homebuilding M&A to stop concentration trends
- Reforming excessive regulatory barriers to entry
- Investigating supplier price discrimination favoring large homebuilders
While much of the recent housing debate has focused on abundance ideas like zoning and permitting reform, these alone will not address the problem. The analysis and recommendations in this paper confront the underlying market power that enables large builders to restrict supply even when regulatory barriers are removed. In the coming weeks, we look forward to engaging with policymakers and partners to help identify and advance bold solutions for housing affordability.
Read the Financial Times column. Watch Ali Velshi’s monologue and his interview with Matt Stoller. And, make sure to read our report.
Warmly, Nidhi Hegde
Executive Director |