From Elizabeth Stein, the NhRP <[email protected]>
Subject Hearing in chimpanzee rights case: Help spread the word
Date September 25, 2025 6:05 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
[link removed] [[link removed]]
image of ... [[link removed]]
Dear John,
I’m glad to be able to share with you that we now have a hearing date in our case demanding the right to liberty for the seven chimpanzees confined at the DeYoung Family Zoo in Michigan.
On October 14th at 10 a.m. ET, an appellate court in Lansing will hear the Nonhuman Rights Project’s arguments calling for the chimpanzees’ freedom. This appeal comes in response to a Michigan trial court judge’s one-sentence denial of the NhRP’s 127-page habeas corpus complaint, which sought a hearing on the merits of the chimpanzees’ case with the goal of securing their release to an accredited sanctuary. The NhRP has already secured similar hearings in other cases. Essentially, the trial court judge refused the chimpanzees any possibility of relief from their confinement through the writ of habeas corpus simply because they’re chimpanzees.
T he hearing is open to the public and will be live-streamed on the Court’s YouTube channel. You can help raise awareness of this hearing and show the court that chimpanzee freedom matters. Here are three different ways to help, no matter where you live:
* Share the chimpanzees’ client page [[link removed]] , which includes their stories, a petition, and more information about the case, including hearing details.
* Look out for our social media posts about the hearing and share them with your network.
* Watch the hearing remotely on the 14th via the Court’s YouTube channel [[link removed]] (note, a recording will be posted to this channel at a later date).

Share the chimpanzees' stories → [[link removed]]
As you may know, the chimpanzees at the DeYoung Family Zoo are barely visible to the public—and in the eyes of the law. In fact, other than one chimpanzee named Louie, all of the others appear to be nameless, which is why we refer to them in our complaint as Prisoners B-G. As outlined in our complaint, the available evidence suggests they’re largely confined to barren, concrete-floored cages behind closed doors, living in conditions known to cause suffering to these self-aware, autonomous beings.
In addition to this hearing being the first of its kind in Michigan, it’s also personally important to me. This is because the NhRP’s first client Tommy was transferred to the DeYoung Family Zoo in 2015 from a cage on a used trailer lot in Gloversville, New York. Unbeknownst to the NhRP, this transfer occurred while our litigation on behalf of Tommy was ongoing. So you might wonder, then, why Tommy isn’t part of this litigation. The answer is tragic. In late 2023, less than a week before we filed our lawsuit in Michigan, we received long-awaited records indicating Tommy died “curled up in his sleeping spot” inside a building at the DeYoung Family Zoo.
How can Tommy’s life and death be so hidden from public view? Very simply. Tommy was considered a legal “thing.” He had no more rights than the TV kept just outside the cage on the used trailer lot where he spent much of his life. I was proud to be part of the fight for Tommy’s right to liberty then, and I’m proud to be part of the fight for the DeYoung Prisoners’ right to liberty now.
Having been a lawyer with the NhRP from the very early days, I’ve seen what we can do when we come together to raise awareness of the suffering caused by our clients’ rightlessness and their need for justice. For example, in 2018, before it was known that Tommy had been moved out of the jurisdiction of the New York courts, a judge on the state’s highest court wrote of his rightlessness:
“Does an intelligent nonhuman animal who thinks and plans and appreciates life as human beings do have the right to the protection of the law against arbitrary cruelties and enforced detentions visited on him or her? This is not merely a definitional question, but a deep dilemma of ethics and policy that demands our attention. To treat a chimpanzee as if he or she had no right to liberty protected by habeas corpus is to regard the chimpanzee as entirely lacking independent worth, as a mere resource for human use, a thing the value of which consists exclusively in its usefulness to others. Instead, we should consider whether a chimpanzee is an individual with inherent value who has the right to be treated with respect .”
This hearing in Michigan represents an important opportunity to encourage the justice system to act with courage and recognize these chimpanzees as the autonomous beings they are, instead of leaving them to suffer without freedom in a state of legal invisibility. To deny them the right to liberty merely because they were born chimpanzees is unjust, arbitrary, and biased. We look forward to urging the appellate court to right this incredible wrong.
Thank you so much for your support.
Elizabeth Stein
Litigation Director, the NhRP
[link removed] [[link removed]]
The NhRP is a nonprofit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) corporation (Tax ID #: 04-3289466). It is solely through your donations that we can continue to work for the recognition and protection of fundamental rights for nonhuman animals.
FOLLOW
[link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]] [link removed] [[link removed]]
DONATE [[link removed]?]
GET YOUR NhRP GEAR AT OUR ONLINE SHOP [[link removed]]
The Nonhuman Rights Project
611 Pennsylvania Avenue SE
#345
Washington, DC 20003
United States
[email protected] [[email protected]]
Click here to unsubscribe. [[link removed]]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis