View this post on the web at [link removed]

There are two phrases that adorn the Missouri state flag [ [link removed] ].
Salus populi suprema lex esto [ [link removed] ], a Latin phrase that translates roughly to “what’s good for the people is the supreme law.”
United we stand, divided we fall.
If you’ve had the misfortune of paying attention to Missouri politics in the last week or so, what you’ll notice: our elected officials seem to be doing the exact opposite.
Everything is designed to divide; no consideration is given to what’s best for Missourians. They’re gerrymandering our Congressional map [ [link removed] ] in ways that’ll harm the whole state; they’re making it harder for citizens to pass ballot measures [ [link removed] ]; they’re fanning the flames of anger and division [ [link removed] ].
Why bother with public welfare and unity when you can steamroll through both on your way to power?
Article summary:
The state legislature continues to strip Missourians of their voice, and they seem to be getting more and more creative with their tactics to do so.
The issues here go beyond anything partisan. Kansas City is the reason that Missouri is still growing; the latest gerrymander will hurt the region and the state.
On a more uplifting note: hope isn’t lost. There are diverse groups coming together to fight the legislature’s brazen power grabs.
Salus factionis suprema lex esto
Forget what’s on the flag, that’s the new Missouri state motto: what’s good for the party is the supreme law.
The state legislature is now meeting for its second special session of the year [ [link removed] ]. They used the first special session [ [link removed] ] to take much-needed money from rural hospitals and education so they could siphon it to the owners of the Chiefs.
But that’s small potatoes relative to what they’re doing now.
First, as part of the national gerrymandering wars [ [link removed] ] I’ve written about [ [link removed] ], they’re redrawing Congressional maps to give the Republicans one additional Congressional seat [ [link removed] ] by chopping up Kansas City [ [link removed] ] into three predominantly rural districts.
As someone who likes to see Democrats win, I’ve got my objections to this. But even taking off my partisan hat, it’s worth noting just how detrimental this Congressional map is for all Missourians.
In these new maps, greater Kansas City becomes a small part of three different districts. What does that mean in practice? Kansas City won’t be anyone’s primary constituency. Three different members of Congress will represent Kansas City, but for all of them, it’ll be just a small chunk of their district.
That’ll lead to less focus on and less investment in Kansas City. Needless to say, that’s very bad. Missouri needs a thriving Kansas City, whose metro area has driven over half of the state’s population growth since 2010.
For context: Missouri would be the sixth slowest-growing state in the U.S. since 2010 [ [link removed] ] without greater Kansas City. It’s the demographic engine of the state, and what they’re doing with this gerrymander makes it difficult for anyone to properly represent Kansas City in Congress.
“United we stand, divided we fall” is right there on our flag. This is a much more literal division than the original flagmakers could’ve ever imagined. And we’ll all suffer for it.
But the second thing that the legislature is doing is much more insidious.
Government is bad…unless we’re the ones controlling it
Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Mike Johnson, on his official website, outlines “7 Core Principles of Conservatism [ [link removed] ].” The very first one:
The birth of our great nation was inspired by the bold declaration that our individual, God-given liberties should be preserved against government intrusion. That same conviction informs our conservative policy decisions still today.
Going back to the ’50s [ [link removed] ] and ’60s [ [link removed] ], through the Reagan years and into the present, this idea that individuals are better at making decisions for themselves than the government has been a bedrock of the conservative movement.
That guiding principle is part of the reason citizen-initiated ballot measures exist in the first place.
It’s a critical check on the power of state legislatures, and over the past decade, it’s allowed Missourians to pass everything from nonpartisan redistricting [ [link removed] ] to abortion access [ [link removed] ] to a higher minimum wage [ [link removed] ].
Missouri’s legislature has done a great job rolling back voter-approved policies through different machinations—a misleading ballot measure to get rid of nonpartisan redistricting [ [link removed] ], putting up hurdles around abortion access [ [link removed] ], and a straight-up repeal of the new minimum wage law [ [link removed] ] just months after voters approved it.
But for Missouri’s legislature, rolling back the will of the voters piecemeal isn’t enough. Now, the legislature is trying to functionally take away this right altogether by requiring a majority of voters [ [link removed] ]and [ [link removed] ] a majority of Congressional districts to pass constitutional amendments [ [link removed] ].
Combined with gerrymandering, what this means: “As few as 5% of voters could defeat initiative petitions. [ [link removed] ]” Which is, of course, the intent.
Conservatives love the idea of checks on government power in theory. Just never in practice.
I wish that were everything
Thought that was the extent of divisive elected officials doing things to make our lives harder? Nope. Also from the past week:
There’s an enormous backlog of public records requests [ [link removed] ], which are critical to knowing what our government is doing and saying behind the scenes, and a critical part of how reporters do their jobs. We have former Attorney General Andrew Bailey to thank for that, who slow-rolled responses [ [link removed] ].
Republican Missouri Senator Eric Schmitt delivered an anti-immigrant screed [ [link removed] ] at the National Conservatism Conference, despite the fact that a) Missouri has one of the lowest foreign-born populations of any state [ [link removed] ] in the country, and b) we have 150,000+ unfilled jobs [ [link removed] ] and an above-average unfilled job rate. Immigrants could help fill that gap.
Where there’s hope
We’ve got our work cut out for us. But it’s not hopeless.
First, I’m not convinced that the legislature will succeed in stripping away our power to introduce ballot measures, because voters will still have to approve the measure. North Dakota [ [link removed] ] and Ohio [ [link removed] ] both tried this gambit and both failed; voters (rightly) don’t like reducing their own voting power!
Politics makes strange bedfellows, and people are lining up to defeat the measure: everyone from the AFL-CIO [ [link removed] ] to the Missouri Association of Realtors [ [link removed] ].
As for gerrymandering, there are early efforts underway to repeal the gerrymander [ [link removed] ] via the ballot—something I mentioned two weeks ago [ [link removed] ] as a possibility. And it’s a winnable fight: gerrymandering is unpopular [ [link removed] ], even in Republican states like Missouri [ [link removed] ].
The fight isn’t over yet. It’s just beginning. But we’ll be fighting on their terms, and that puts sanity—and what’s good for Missourians—at a disadvantage from the get-go.
Feel free to share this post with someone who will find this interesting. If you’re reading this email because someone sent it to you, please consider subscribing [ [link removed] ].

Unsubscribe [link removed]?