Landmark Ruling Affirms Parents’ First Amendment Protections, Yet State and Local Officials Stall on Compliance
͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Thank you for being a free subscriber to So, Does It Matter? Please support what we do. And also get 100% of our content (right now you get about 60% of it!

Upgrade to paid


California’s Schools Defy Supreme Court on Parental Rights

Landmark Ruling Affirms Parents’ First Amendment Protections, Yet State and Local Officials Stall on Compliance

Jon Fleischman
Sep 4
∙
Preview
 
READ IN APP
 
⏱️ 4.5 minute read

A Clear Win for Parental Choice

In late June the U.S. Supreme Court issued a groundbreaking 6-3 decision in Mahmoud v. Taylor, a ruling that could change everything for parents fighting to protect their kids’ values. Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion delivered a powerful message: government schools can’t force students into lessons that clash with their family’s deepest beliefs. Sparked by a battle in Montgomery County, Maryland, over storybooks like Pride Puppy and Born Ready, this decision is a beacon of hope—but is it enough? Curious about how this victory is being undermined? The full story awaits below.

We covered this right after the decision was issued, where we provided a detailed breakdown and a practical tool for parents: a sample opt-out letter. This template urged families to submit requests via email and certified mail, ensuring a paper trail while pressing schools to provide alternative assignments without penalizing students. It was a call to action for parents to assert their rights until districts formalized compliant processes, filling the gap left by bureaucratic delays.

Our afternoon posts, for the most part, are for paid subscribers. Don’t miss out. It’s not very much. Press the BRB for more details, and to get instant access to the rest of this informative column, and 100% of all of our content!

Upgrade to paid

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to So, Does It Matter? California Politics! to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Start trial

A subscription gets you:

Subscriber-only Afternoon Posts. Analysis on breaking News
Saturday’s Popular “What is Jon Reading” Column
100% percent of our site content is yours!
 
Like
Comment
Restack
 

© 2025 Jon Fleischman
4040 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 200, Newport Beach, CA 92660
Unsubscribe

Get the appStart writing