[link removed]
FAIR
View article on FAIR's website ([link removed])
WSJ Ran 10 Op-Eds in One Week to Try to Take Down Mamdani Emma Llano ([link removed])
New York State Assembly member Zohran Mamdani handily won the New York City Democratic mayoral primary in June, despite corporate media’s best attempts to discredit ([link removed]) and suppress ([link removed]) his campaign. But his opponents are not giving up, and Mamdani faces three noteworthy challengers in the general election.
Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s humiliating defeat, incumbent Mayor Eric Adams’ overwhelming unpopularity and Republican Curtis Sliwa’s eccentricities have not stopped the Wall Street Journal from trying to discourage New Yorkers from voting for Mamdani in the general election. Once primary results became official on July 1, the Journal published ten op-eds in a single week (7/1–7/25) that cast Mamdani in a negative light.
** Red scare
------------------------------------------------------------
WSJ: The Lure of Comrade Mamdani
Mary Anastasia O’Grady (Wall Street Journal, 7/6/25 ([link removed]) ) denounced Zohran Mamdani's "plan to turn New York into an Orwellian 'Animal Farm' of equality."
Mamdani is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, which to the Wall Street Journal is equivalent to Stalinism. There are currently six mayors ([link removed]) in America who are DSA members, and none of them have implemented purges or rounded up billionaires into gulags. That does not stop the Journal’s opinion writers from fearmongering about a dystopian future under Mamdani.
Under the headline "The Lure of Comrade Mamdani," former Merrill Lynch strategist ([link removed]) and current Heritage Foundation affiliate ([link removed]) Mary Anastasia O’Grady (7/6/25 ([link removed]) ) asked, “Have you made something of yourself? If so, [Mamdani is] coming for you.” O’Grady attacked Mamdani’s progressive platform through references to Argentina
([link removed]) , Cuba ([link removed]) and Venezuela ([link removed]) , blaming their economic struggles on socialist leaders. She made no mention, of course, of the US interventionist policies—including not just coups and coup attempts, but also strangling economic blockades and punishments ([link removed]) —that were key drivers of those struggles.
Columnist Jason L. Riley (7/1/25 ([link removed]) ) offered readers a "Blueprint for Defeating Zohran Mamdani": the 2021 Buffalo mayoral election. His op-ed gleefully recounted that when Black democratic socialist India Walton ([link removed]) won the Democratic primary there, business elites collaborated with Republicans and establishment Democrats to flood the general election with money and crush her campaign in favor of "corrupt, incompetent" (Jacobin, 11/3/21 ([link removed]) ) incumbent Byron Brown.
WSJ: Mamdani Brings Third World Prejudices to New York
Sadanand Dhume (Wall Street Journal, 7/2/25 ([link removed]) ) accused Mamdani of importing "Third World" ideas like rent control (which New York City has had since 1943 ([link removed]) ).
Sadanand Dhume ([link removed]) (7/2/25 ([link removed]) ) of the right-wing American Enterprise Institute contributed the outrageously headlined op-ed, “Mamdani Brings Third World Prejudices to New York.” “Why would someone who emigrated to the US from a poor country champion ideas that keep poor countries poor?” he asked.
More than one writer compared Mamdani to Trump in terms of their extremism. In his piece, Gerard Baker (7/7/25 ([link removed]) ) lambasted the "siren song of socialism," suggesting that Mamdani and Trump similarly adhere to a "reality-challenging radicalism." Mamdani shows that Democrats "refuse to reconcile with the new order," and would rather "take their chances on the easy appeal of radical ideas."
Meanwhile, Long Island Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi (7/2/25 ([link removed]) ) repeatedly drew parallels between Mamdani and Trump, and argued that New York would be destroyed by Mamdani’s “lofty, utopian promises: free public transit, free college tuition, more public housing, sweeping debt cancellation and massive overhauls of systems”—because they will be paid for by modestly increasing taxes ([link removed]) on corporations and people making millions. Allysia Finley (7/6/25 ([link removed]) ) took issue with Mamdani’s proposed tax increases for the wealthy, irrespective of the social benefits that money could provide.
Former hedge fund manager Jay Newman ([link removed]) (7/7/25 ([link removed]) ) published a satirical op-ed titled “Some Modest Proposals for Mamdani,” modeled on Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal.” While Swift's essay ([link removed]) was meant to bring attention to the plight of the Irish poor and the callousness of the English response, Newman used the format to mock Mamdani for wanting to respond to the homeless crisis. Newman suggested that Mamdani might convert the Metropolitan Museum of Art into public housing—ignoring the city’s tens of thousands of empty apartment units ([link removed]) .
** Israel: NYC’s sixth borough?
------------------------------------------------------------
WSJ: Escape From Mamdani’s New York? That Isn’t the Jewish Way
If polling ([link removed]) is to be believed, the Jewish way is more to vote for Mamdani's New York (Wall Street Journal, 7/3/25 ([link removed]) ).
Much ([link removed]) has been written ([link removed]) about ([link removed]) the Islamophobia and baseless ([link removed]) accusations of antisemitism the Zionist establishment has hurled against Mamdani. The Wall Street Journal is a key player in that narrative. Five of the ten anti-Mamdani op-eds (7/2/25 ([link removed]) , 7/3/25 ([link removed]) , 7/3/25 ([link removed]) , 7/7/25
([link removed]) , 7/7/25 ([link removed]) ) included reference to Mamdani's anti-Israel stance (or that of his supporters) as a means to paint him as unfit for office; all of these mentioned "Hamas," "globalize the intifada ([link removed]) " or both.
Dhume (7/2/25 ([link removed]) ), who dedicated three entire paragraphs to Mamdani's position on Israel, expressed outrage over Mamdani’s compliance with international law. He wrote that Mamdani "accuses the Jewish state of ‘genocide’ in Gaza. If elected, he said he would arrest Benjamin Netanyahu if the Israeli prime minister visits New York City.” This is presented as if Mamdani himself is making these accusations, rather than echoing the conclusions of several ([link removed]) human ([link removed]) rights ([link removed]) organizations ([link removed]) , and joining various
([link removed]) world ([link removed]) leaders ([link removed]) in complying ([link removed]) with the ICC’s arrest warrant ([link removed]) for Netanyahu ([link removed]) . (A Data for Progress poll—7/11-17/25 ([link removed]) —found that 78% of Democratic primary voters believe that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people, and 63% think that New York's mayor should enforce the warrant against Netanyahu.)
Multiple writers warned of a mass exodus of Jews from New York in the face of a Mamdani mayoralty. In an opinion interview with political consultant Hank Sheinkopf ([link removed]) , Tunku Varadarajan (7/3/25 ([link removed]) ) wrote that Sheinkopf
expects Jews will start to leave New York in substantial numbers. “Never mind the general election. Jews will think, ‘If Mamdani’s got this far, who knows what’s next?’ ” There are now three-quarters of a million Muslims in New York—nearly 9% of the population. Mr. Mamdani campaigned extensively in their neighborhoods.
It's an Islamophobic version of the Great Replacement Theory ([link removed]) , using a dubious outlier number for the Muslim population, which most sources report ([link removed]) to be around 3% of the city's population (compared to a Jewish population of 7%).
Sheinkopf also suggested that Mamdani's New York would be “the capital of class war and hatred and antisemitism, where it’s OK for a mayor to say the intifada’s just fine.”
Meanwhile, Dovid Margolin (7/3/25 ([link removed]) ) wrote that Jews in New York "are nervous" because they "know what it means to have to flee. They know what it looks like in America, too, when their homes are no longer safe and there is no one to call for help." He painted such a dire depiction of the predicament of Jews under a Mamdani administration that he felt he had to quote Lubavitcher Rebbe Menachem Schneerson ([link removed]) , "One must stand firm and not run away."
Despite the Journal’s allegations that Jewish New Yorkers are terrified of a Mamdani victory, his opponent Cuomo believes that “50% of the Jewish people voted for Mamdani" (Forward, 7/20/25 ([link removed]) ). A recent poll by Zenith and Public Progress (7/16–24/25 ([link removed]) ) found Mamdani getting a 43% plurality of the Jewish vote in a five-way race—vs. 26% for Cuomo. Mamdani was the choice of an overwhelming 67% of Jews between 18–44, with Cuomo having only 7% support from this group.
** 'Useful idiot generation'
------------------------------------------------------------
WSJ: Gen Z, the Useful Idiot Generation
Mark Penn and Andrew Stein (Wall Street Journal, 7/7/25 ([link removed]) ): "Call [Gen X] the Useful Idiot generation, mouthing slogans and causes they don’t understand and from which they would recoil if they did."
Mamdani's youthfulness—and that of his most enthusiastic voters—also irked some Journal writers, who took a “back in my day” approach, presenting ageist and easily debunkable claims about the negative influence Generation Z supposedly has on US politics.
Sheinkopf (7/3/25 ([link removed]) ), for instance, argued that, because of their politics, "the kids are going to be the death of New York.” He called Gen Z “the most pampered generation in the history of the world…. I’m sorry they can’t buy an apartment. But they can buy a $9 latte, and a $100 dinner.”
Given that the average price of a two-bedroom apartment in Manhattan is $1.5 million ([link removed]) , young people would have to forgo their imaginary daily latte and dinner for almost eight years before they could afford a down payment.
Varadarajan also criticized Mamdani for his privileged upbringing, contrasting it with Sheinkopf's “hardscrabble background” in which he “‘cut corned beef at the Carnegie Deli’ as he put himself through college.” Neither Sheinkopf nor Varadarajan noted that around the time that Sheinkopf was attending college, the average yearly tuition ([link removed]) for a US public college was $394. After adjusting for inflation, that's a quarter of the cost in the 2020s.
The crown jewel of this argument, though, was an op-ed headlined “Gen Z: the Useful Idiot Generation” (7/7/25 ([link removed]) ) by Democratic strategist/corporate lobbyist Mark Penn ([link removed]) and disgraced ([link removed]) former New York City politician Andrew Stein. They fret about the generation's "radicalism," which they argue stems from being "indoctrinated" at college (where, among other things, they supposedly “learn that socialism means free stuff”), delaying marriage and turning away from religion, all of which leaves them "unmoored." They warned:
Socialism and antisemitism will continue to fester and grow if we don’t stand up and reform our universities, reinforce our basic values and balance our social media.
Though the primary results are finalized, the Wall Street Journal has joined with others ([link removed]) in New York’s corporate media in trying to ensure that Mamdani's success, and his supporters' enthusiasm, ends there.
Read more ([link removed])
Share this post: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Twitter"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Facebook"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Pinterest"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Pinterest" alt="Pinterest" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Google Plus"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Google Plus" alt="Google Plus" class="mc-share"></a>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="[link removed]" title="Instapaper"><img border="0" height="15" width="15" src="[link removed]" title="Instapaper" alt="Instapaper" class="mc-share"></a>
© 2021 Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed up for email alerts from
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
Our mailing address is:
FAIRNESS & ACCURACY IN REPORTING
124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201
New York, NY 10001
FAIR's Website ([link removed])
FAIR counts on your support to do this work — please donate today ([link removed]) .
Follow us on Twitter ([link removed]) | Friend us on Facebook ([link removed])
change your preferences ([link removed])
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]
unsubscribe ([link removed]) .