[link removed]
[link removed]

By Angie D. Holan (mailto:[email protected]?subject=&body=) and Enock Nyariki (mailto:[email protected]?subject=&body=)

In this edition
* Google retires ClaimReview, leaving fact-checkers frustrated
* Free webinar: How PolitiFact researchers find what others miss
* DW honors Georgian journalist as press freedom erodes

Bill Adair of Duke University speaks to fact-checkers from around the world about ClaimReview during a panel with fellow fact-checking leaders at GlobalFact 12 in Rio de Janeiro in late June. (Photo by Andressa Guerra/Poynter)

By Angie D. Holan

People’s complaints about Google search results — more spam, less usefulness — have been rising for a couple ([link removed]) of ([link removed]) years ([link removed]) now ([link removed]) . Previous complaints centered on product reviews, shopping and clickbait-y misinformation.

In recent weeks, though, Google took steps to downgrade fact-checking content, leaving fact-checkers scratching their heads. Why remove something so helpful?

Google decided to retire ClaimReview, a program little known outside the fact-checking world that highlighted fact checks from reputable news sources like PolitiFact, The Washington Post Fact Checker or Factcheck.org ([link removed]) . The program was international in scale, also surfacing results from fact-checkers like Spain’s Maldita, the UK’s Full Fact, and Argentina’s Chequeado, among many others. Google said the structured data results would be gradually phased out.

The program worked ([link removed]) like this: Fact-checkers added a short bit of code to their articles so search engines could recognize them as fact checks. That open-source code, called ClaimReview, let platforms like Google and Meta highlight verified information.

The highlights weren’t dramatic, but they did let people know that what they were searching for had been fact-checked, and pointed them to that content in a useful way. The program has been quietly chugging along, raising the profile of fact-checking for the past 10 years. More than 250,000 fact checks have been tagged with ClaimReview, and Google itself reported ([link removed]) in 2019 that annual impressions likely reached 4 billion.

A Google search shows a ClaimReview result from PolitiFact. (Screenshot via Google)

It was a small, useful step toward improving overall information integrity on the internet and the quality of search results for end users. So why wouldn’t Google keep doing this?

Google says, confoundingly, that it’s aiming to improve search results with this action. It announced it was retiring ClaimReview in a blog post with a slew of other small technical changes, such as ending highlights for vehicle listings and educational videos. “Removing them will help streamline the results page and focus on other experiences that are more useful and widely used,” Google said ([link removed]) .

Fact-checkers, to say the least, are none too pleased.

“For our users, it means we now risk being just another result, particularly as AI search Overviews begin to push high quality website results further down the page,” said ([link removed]) Andrew Dudfield, head of AI at Full Fact “The work we have put into ensuring we explain how and why we come to a conclusion is thrown into the mix with a hodgepodge of other websites, and the internet becomes harder to trust.”

“Google did not inform fact-checkers that the 10-year collaboration was coming to an end, let alone consult with us on the decision to stop using the fact checks that we provided for free,” said ([link removed]) Clara Jiménez Cruz of Maldita, in a post on Nieman Lab.

When asked by the International Fact-Checking Network about the move, a Google spokesperson who declined to be named said that the company had tested the change and concluded removing the program was a “minor cleanup (that) affected a very small percentage of results, does not change Search rankings, and our tests showed it has no impact on traffic to these pages.”

Some researchers have also defended ([link removed]) Google against the charge that search results are worse. The problem might be that more junk content ([link removed]) is being posted to the internet, and Google search results are simply reflecting that increase of low-quality information.

In the U.S., it’s one more kick in the teeth during an already hard year for fact-checkers. Meta ended its third-party fact-checking program in January with high-profile announcements from Mark Zuckerberg and an appearance on “Fox & Friends” from Meta’s Joel Kaplan, in seeming deference to the Trump administration’s hostility to fact-checking.

Glenn Kessler of The Washington Post Fact Checker said he was sorry to see Google deprecate ClaimReview. Kessler, part of a small group that developed the idea in 2015, said he hopes the tagging system will have a future use for generative artificial intelligence and large language models.

Thanks to the decentralized nature of the internet, just because Google is losing ClaimReview, doesn’t mean others will. The code is part of an open-source system, promoted through Schema.org ([link removed]) , and can be used on any search engine. Some fact-checkers are also using ClaimReview to provide cues to new chatbots and other AI applications.

Bill Adair of Duke University has promoted ClaimReview over the years as part of his work seeking to increase fact-checking automation. He says fact-checkers should keep using ClaimReview in the hopes that it will either yield new ways of informing AI search results, or give fact-checkers themselves new options to distribute their work as the internet evolves. ClaimReview, he said, is a practical way to denote high-quality fact checks as distinct from the junk content flooding the internet.

“Fact-checkers shouldn’t let the tech companies be the only ones who maintain a database of this important work,” he said.


Master research skills in PolitiFact’s newest webinar

Learn how experienced reporters and fact-checkers find information others miss in The 5 Ws of Research ([link removed]) , a new webinar from PolitiFact featuring researcher Caryn Baird and staff writer Loreben Tuquero. You’ll get practical tips for locating U.S.-based public records, court filings, corporate documents and more.

The webinar is free for one month (a $75 value) and will be available live on July 30 or on demand afterward. It’s ideal for fact-checkers, journalists and editors looking to improve their reporting. Enroll now ([link removed]) at no cost.

Georgian fact-checker wins DW freedom of speech award amid growing threats

Tamar Kintsurashvili, editor-in-chief of Myth Detector, holds up the DW Freedom of Speech Award after receiving the honor at the Global Media Forum in Bonn. (Photo: DW)

A Georgian fact-checker leading efforts against misinformation and government repression received Deutsche Welle’s 2025 Freedom of Speech Award at the Global Media Forum in Bonn, Germany.

Tamar Kintsurashvili, editor-in-chief of Myth Detector and executive director of the Media Development Foundation (MDF), accepted the prestigious award, dedicating it to colleagues facing government harassment in her home country. She warned attendees that Georgia is moving “drastically toward autocracy,” distancing itself from its earlier ambitions to join the European Union.

“This recognition comes at a critical time for my country,” Kintsurashvili said during her acceptance speech ([link removed]) , highlighting Georgia's troubling shift away from democratic values.

Fact-checking organizations in Georgia, including the IFCN-accredited Myth Detector and FactCheck Georgia, have come under mounting pressure since 2024, when lawmakers passed a controversial law ([link removed]) requiring media and civil society groups with international funding to register as “foreign agents.” The legislation has fueled smear campaigns, threats, and acts of intimidation against journalists ([link removed]) and watchdog groups.

Last month, Georgian authorities intensified their actions, launching an investigation into Kintsurashvili’s organization. The Anti-Corruption Bureau demanded sensitive personal data of MDF’s partners and beneficiaries, which the organization declined to provide, calling the demand illegal and a violation of privacy.

Just more than a year ago, the International Fact-Checking Network and the European Fact-Checking Standards Network strongly condemned ([link removed]) controversial law, warning of serious risks to independent journalism and press freedom.

U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Roger Wicker recently labeled the Georgian government’s campaign against civil society as anti-democratic.

Kintsurashvili, undeterred by the growing pressure, vowed to continue her work. “Our only crime is holding the government accountable,” she said, appealing for international solidarity with Georgian civil society.

Have ideas or suggestions for the next issue of Factually? Email us at [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]?subject=&body=) .

[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]
[link removed]

© All rights reserved Poynter Institute 2025
801 Third Street South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701

Was this email forwarded to you? Subscribe to our newsletters ([link removed]) .

If you don't want to receive email updates from Poynter, we understand.
You can change your subscription preferences ([link removed]) or unsubscribe from all Poynter emails ([link removed]) .