View this email in your browser ([link removed])
[link removed]



** For Immediate Release: July 17, 2025
------------------------------------------------------------


** Fourth Federal Judge Strikes Down Trump’s ‘Law Firm Intimidation Policy’ as Unconstitutional Assault on Free Speech
------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a resounding rebuke of executive overreach, a fourth federal judge has struck down a Trump administration executive order aimed at punishing a law firm for the clients it represents ([link removed]) and the causes it supports.

The ruling in Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President ([link removed]) blocks enforcement of an executive order ([link removed]) targeting Susman Godfrey LLP over the firm’s representation of Dominion Voting Systems and state officials involved in 2020 election litigation, donating to a group which advocates for equal treatment of LGBTQ service members, and stating on its website that “diversity is one of the firm’s core values.” The court ruled ([link removed]) that representing unpopular clients, corporate political speech (including donations), and statements valuing diversity are all forms of constitutionally protected expression under the First Amendment. The court also found that the executive order violated other constitutional protections, including the rights to petition
the government, association, due process, and counsel, while also undermining the separation of powers.

“If the government can blacklist a law firm for representing an unpopular client or expressing an unpopular idea, then no one’s rights are safe—not journalists, not whistleblowers, not ordinary Americans,” said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute and author of Battlefield America: The War on the American People ([link removed]) . “This is not just an abuse of power—it’s a direct assault on the Constitution. The right to dissent, to associate freely, and to challenge government in court is what keeps tyranny in check.”
MAKE THE GOVERNMENT PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION: SUPPORT THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM ([link removed])

As part of a broader campaign to intimidate and silence legal dissent, President Trump issued executive orders instructing federal agencies to suspend security clearances, terminate contracts, cease providing goods and services, restrict access to federal buildings, and refrain from hiring employees of disfavored law firms. According to former Trump advisor Steve Bannon, the intent was to “put those law firms out of business.” The American Bar Association denounced the administration’s efforts “to severely damage and intimidate firms and lawyers to abandon clients, causes, and policy positions the President does not like.”

Pushing back against what the ABA calls Trump’s “Law Firm Intimidation Policy,” The Rutherford Institute joined a broad coalition of civil liberties organizations—including the ACLU, ACLU of D.C., Cato Institute, Center for Individual Rights, Electronic Frontier Foundation, FIRE, the Institute for Justice, the Knight First Amendment Institute, the National Coalition Against Censorship, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, and the Society for the Rule of Law—in filing amicus briefs ([link removed]) challenging the orders on behalf of four law firms: Perkins Coie ([link removed]) , Jenner & Block ([link removed]) , WilmerHale
([link removed]) , and Susman Godfrey ([link removed]) . The coalition argued that these executive orders violate the separation of powers and amount to an unconstitutional assault on free speech, legal advocacy, and due process. To date, four federal judges have independently ruled these executive orders unconstitutional.

Cecillia D. Wang, Ben Wizner, Brian Hauss, and Arthur B. Spitzer at ACLU advanced the arguments in the amicus briefs ([link removed]) .

The Rutherford Institute ([link removed]) , a nonprofit civil liberties organization, defends individuals whose constitutional rights have been threatened or violated and educates the public on a wide spectrum of issues affecting their freedoms.
------------------------------------------------------------


** Case History
------------------------------------------------------------

April 03, 2025 • Legal Coalition Challenges President Trump’s Weaponization of Executive Orders to Chill Speech, Suppress Dissent, and Erode Checks and Balances ([link removed])

April 15, 2025 • Legal Coalition Challenges Trump’s Use of Executive Orders to Retaliate Against More Law Firms & Erode Checks and Balance? ([link removed])

May 05, 2025 • Court Warns of ‘Totalitarian’ Overreach, Declares Trump’s Blacklisting of Law Firm Illegal as Civil Liberties Groups Expand Legal Challenge ([link removed])

June 05, 2025 • Courts Reject Trump’s Retaliatory War on Law Firms, Free Speech, and Separation of Powers—Judges Cry Foul Over Authoritarian Overreach ([link removed])

Amicus Briefs:
* Susman Godfrey v. Executive Office of the President ([link removed])
* Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice ([link removed])
* WilmerHale LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice ([link removed])
* Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice ([link removed])

District Court Opinions:
* Susman Godfrey v. Executive Office of the President ([link removed])
* Jenner & Block LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice ([link removed])
* WilmerHale LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice ([link removed])
* Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice ([link removed])

------------------------------------------------------------

This press release is also available at www.rutherford.org ([link removed]) .

Source: [link removed]
[link removed] Share ([link removed])
[link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Ffederal-judge-strikes-down-trumps-law-firm-intimidation-policy-as-unconstitutional Tweet ([link removed]: https%3A%2F%2Fmailchi.mp%2Frutherford%2Ffederal-judge-strikes-down-trumps-law-firm-intimidation-policy-as-unconstitutional)
[link removed] Forward ([link removed])
CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ([link removed])

To donate via PayPal, please click below:
[link removed]

============================================================
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Facebook ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** Follow us on Twitter ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nisha Whitehead
(434) 978-3888 ext. 604
** [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Post Office Box 7482
Charlottesville, VA 22906-7482
Phone: (434) 978-3888
** www.rutherford.org ([link removed])

Copyright © 2025 The Rutherford Institute, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the work of The Rutherford Institute. Founded in 1982 by constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute is a civil liberties organization that provides free legal services to people whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. To discontinue your membership electronically, or if you feel you are receiving this message in error, please follow the link below.

Under the regulations of the United States Internal Revenue Service, The Rutherford Institute is incorporated as a 501(c)(3) tax exempt nonprofit organization. Donations to support The Rutherford Institute’s legal and educational work help to safeguard the constitutional rights of all Americans. Donations are tax-deductible. In compliance with general industry standards of a nonprofit organization, the Institute is audited annually by an independent accounting firm.

** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])

** update subscription preferences ([link removed])