Judicial Watch announced today that the Supreme Court of the
United States has agreed to hear its appeal of the decision of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in a case filed on behalf of
Congressman Mike Bost and two presidential electors, challenging an
Illinois law extending Election Day for 14 days beyond the date established
by federal law (Rep.Michael J. Bost, Laura Pollastrini, and Susan Sweeney
v. The Illinois State Board of Elections and Bernadette Matthews (No.
1:22-cv-02754, 23-2644, 24-568)).
|
|
Because no one is above
the law! |
Jun 2, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
 |
RIGHTS
AND FREEDOMS IN PERIL
"When it comes to fighting
for the American people’s ‘right to know,’ no one holds a candle to
Tom Fitton and his team at Judicial Watch" - Sean
Hannity
Tom Fitton returns with an exhaustive investigation into the progressive
movement’s efforts to dismantle the venerable institutions of American
rights and freedoms.
Order Tom Fitton's
Must-Read Today!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Today's Top Stories
|
|
|
Judicial Watch: Supreme Court Will Hear Judicial Watch
Case on Election Law Challenge
Judicial Watch announced today
that the Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear its appeal
of the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in a
case filed on behalf of Congressman Mike Bost and two presidential
electors, challenging an Illinois law extending Election Day for 14 days
beyond the date established by federal law (Rep. Michael J. Bost, Laura
Pollastrini, and Susan Sweeney v. The Illinois State Board of Elections and
Bernadette Matthews (No. 1:22-cv-02754, 23-2644, 24-568)). The lower courts
had denied that Bost had standing to challenge Illinois’ practice of
counting ballots received after Election Day. (The Election Day lawsuit was
initially filed on May 25, 2022.).
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Supreme
Court to Hear Congressman’s Challenge to State Ballot-Counting Law
The Epoch Times
Judicial
Watch, the group that brought the appeal on behalf of the petitioners,
hailed the Supreme Court’s decision to accept the case.
“It is an injustice that the courts would deny a federal candidate the
ability to challenge an election provision that could lead to illegal votes
being cast and counted for two weeks after Election Day,” Judicial Watch
President Tom Fitton told The Epoch Times.
READ MORE
|
Supreme
Court to consider reviving GOP challenge to Illinois mail ballot
deadline
The Hill
In their
petition to the high court, Bost and the two electors said the decision
disrupts a long line of cases enabling federal political candidates to
challenge election regulations.
“In the aftermath of the 2020 elections, however, for a variety of
reasons, courts have limited candidates’ ability to challenge the
electoral rules governing their campaigns. This case presents the
latest—and an extreme—example of this trend,” their attorneys
wrote.
READ MORE
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Keep our investigators on the job uncovering the truth:
|
|
|
|
|
|