Last October, right before the presidential election, Bill Whitaker of CBS News’ “60 Minutes” did an interview with Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. It was part of the show’s tradition — to interview the presidential candidates.
Republican candidate Donald Trump, however, turned down an interview for “60 Minutes”. Then he got mad about the Harris interview.
He sued CBS’s owner, Paramount, for $20 billion, claiming CBS News intentionally edited the interview to make Harris look good and help her win the presidency.
Most legal experts have said all along that Trump has no case.
Yet here we are, with reports that Paramount’s higher ups are looking to settle the case with Trump. That decision drew swift condemnation from inside the network and outside as well. While it isn’t the sole reason, “60 Minutes” executive producer Bill Owens and Wendy McMahon, the president of CBS News and Stations, have resigned, it is reported that Owens and McMahon are adamant that Paramount not settle with Trump, nor apologize for anything.
So why, if legal experts say Trump has no case, is Paramount talking about a settlement? Simple. It’s strictly business. Paramount and Skydance are in the midst of a merger and need government (i.e. Trump) approval for the sale to go through.
Both sides of the legal battle are talking settlement, but it doesn’t appear that an agreement is close.
The Wall Street Journal’s Jessica Toonkel and Josh Dawsey reported that after a month of negotiations, Paramount offered $15 million to settle the case, but Trump’s team wants more than $25 million. It also wants an apology from CBS News as part of the deal.
My guess? Trump wants the apology more than the money so he can say, “See? I’m right, and CBS News admitted it was wrong.” It offers another opportunity for Trump to tout his claims that the media is biased against him. That’s why so many in the industry don’t want Paramount to settle, or apologize. Also, it’s been reported by The Journal that McMahon’s unwillingness to issue Trump an apology was one of the reasons for tension between her and corporate.
So where did Paramount come up with the $15 million figure?
Toonkel and Dawsey noted, “Disney in December settled a defamation lawsuit against ABC News and star anchor George Stephanopoulos by contributing $15 million to Trump’s presidential foundation or museum and to pay $1 million in legal fees to Trump’s lawyer. Stephanopoulos had said on air that Trump had been found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll. A federal jury determined Trump was liable for sexual abuse.”
Oh, and to add a bit more to Trump and CBS, The Associated Press’ David Bauder has “Trump suffered ‘mental anguish’ from disputed CBS News interview with Harris, lawyer says.”
Major layoffs
Business Insider laid off 21% of its staff on Thursday. The media company laid off 8% of its employees early last year and 10% in April of 2023. It’s not clear exactly how many employees were included in this round of layoffs, but in 2023, the outlet had more than 800 employees worldwide.
In a memo to staff, Business Insider CEO Barbara Peng called it a “difficult day.” She added that the company was “scaling back on categories that once performed well on other platforms but no longer drive meaningful readership or aren’t areas where we can lead.”
She continued, “This is a new Business Insider. It’s more focused. It’s intentional. And it’s working. More broadly though, the media industry is at a crossroads. Business models are under pressure, distribution is unstable and competition for attention is fiercer than ever. At the same time, there’s a huge opportunity for companies who harness AI first. Our strategy is strong, but we don’t have the luxury of time. The pace of change combined with the opportunity ahead demands bold, focused action — and it’s our chance to lead the pack.”
Business Insider is a property of Axel Springer. Insider Union and The NewsGuild of New York had an angry response to the layoffs, calling it “another example of Axel Springer’s brazen pivot away from journalism toward greed.”
They wrote, “Let’s be clear: This is far from anything new. This is the third round of layoffs in as many years and it is unacceptable that union members and other talented coworkers are again paying the price for the strategic failures of Business Insider’s leadership. Axel Springer is a multi-billion dollar firm whose digital outlets and media businesses generate the majority of its revenue. The layoffs of our talented co-workers and union members is another example of Axel Springer’s brazen pivot away from journalism toward greed. Shockingly, in the same email announcing the layoffs, management also says it's ‘going all-in on Al,’ patting themselves on the back about Al use in our newsroom. To say this was tone-deaf to include in an email on layoffs would be an understatement.”
Let’s get ready to rumble