Washington, D.C. (May 29, 2025) – States require tools to help identify those eligible to vote in the United States, and DHS needs tools to uncover employers who are knowingly employing illegal aliens. According to two new publications,
Reviving No-Match Letters: A powerful tool against illegal employment and
The Trump Administration is Empowering States to Verify Voters Citizenship) authored by Center for Immigration Studies Senior Legal Fellow George Fishman, verifying Social Security numbers could be the solution to both issues.
Voter Eligibility Verification
Executive Order: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that it will be giving states and localities the ability to check SSNs of individuals registering to vote and those already on the voter rolls to verify citizenship.
History: Fishman reflects on his role in proposing this idea nearly three decades ago as part of the 1997 Voter Eligibility Verification Act.
How it will work: State and local governments will be given access to federal databases through an upgrade of USCIS’s
Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system (originally limited to establishing eligibility for welfare) to confirm citizenship.
Employment Eligibility Verification
No-Match Letters: Although the administration has not announced any action on re-instating “no-match” letters, the SSA could revive the practice of notifying employers when a worker’s Social Security number doesn’t match the name listed in the SSA’s database.
History: The episode covers the history of no-match letters, including their origins, past implementations, and abandonment by the Obama and Biden administrations.
Policy Recommendations: Fishman recommends that SSA resume issuing no-match letters and DHS reissue its regulations instructing employers that they may be found to know that they are employing illegal aliens if they don’t take certain actions upon receipt of no-match letters.
In his commentary, host Mark Krikorian, the Center’s executive director, highlights recent expanded social media vetting of foreign students and the revoking of Harvard’s ability to enroll and continue to permit attendance of foreign students. A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order. But will it change the outcome for Harvard when the State Department can simply deny new visas, and current students will be looking to transfer?
