[[link removed]]

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS TRYING TO UNRAVEL ONE OF OUR GREATEST
NATIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS  
[[link removed]]


 

John B. King Jr.
May 25, 2025
The New York Times
[[link removed]]


*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ Whether it is purging half of the staff at the U.S. Department of
Education or telling teachers to stop teaching the hard parts of our
history, the Trump administration is trying to unravel public
education. _

, Image by Debbie Tea

 

I have attended commencements of all kinds throughout my career, and I
can tell you that some of the best are in prisons.

Over and over, I have spoken at these commencements with incarcerated
men and women who acknowledge the awful choices or stupid mistakes
they made, the strangers or loved ones they hurt, yet emerge from
prison renewed through higher education. While 95 percent of the
people incarcerated will come home one day, they often return to the
same cycles that led them to prison in the first place. Through
college coursework, they are able to reflect on their past, develop a
clearer vision for their future and gain the skills to contribute to
their families and communities.

One student told me that pursuing college while incarcerated was the
first time he had moral and academic credibility with his family. The
potential for higher education in prison to change lives is the reason
that I worked to expand these programs when I was the U.S. secretary
of education and president of a national education civil rights
organization, and do so now as chancellor of the State University of
New York.

I believe so deeply in the transformative power of education because
teachers saved my life.

When I was 8 years old, in October of 1983, my mother died suddenly
from a heart attack. It was indescribably devastating. I then lived
alone with my father, who was struggling with Alzheimer’s until he
died when I was 12. During those years with my father, no one outside
our home knew he was sick, and I didn’t know why he acted the way he
did.

Some nights he would talk to me; some nights he wouldn’t say a word.
Other nights he would be sad or angry, or even violent. Home was scary
and unstable, but I was blessed to have New York City public
schoolteachers who made school a place that was safe, nurturing,
academically rigorous and engaging.

Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter  Get expert analysis of the
news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday
morning. Get it sent to your inbox.

If not for Allan Osterweil, my teacher in fourth, fifth and sixth
grade at P.S. 276 in Canarsie, Brooklyn, I would be in prison or dead.
Amid the darkness of my home life, Mr. Osterweil gave me a sense of
hope and purpose. In his classroom, we read The New York Times every
day. We learned the capital and leader of every country in the world.
We did productions of Shakespeare and Lewis Carroll.

The language of both plays was incredibly difficult, but the joy of
learning our roles and staging the productions helped us not only to
enlarge our vocabularies and hone our public speaking skills, but also
to fall in love with the arts. Field trips to the American Museum of
Natural History, the ballet at the Brooklyn Academy of Music and the
Brooklyn Botanic Garden adjacent to Prospect Park exposed us to a
world beyond our own.

But what made Mr. Osterweil’s classroom magical wasn’t just the
content, it was also the relationships. He was genuinely curious about
what 8- and 9-year-olds had to say about the Cold War or famine in
Africa and engaged us in serious conversations, asking probing
questions, listening carefully. He brought in fantastically elaborate
seashells he had collected with his wife on beaches around the world
because he wanted to help us appreciate the beauty of nature and to
share his passions with us.

It was very unusual in the New York City schools of the time for a
teacher to stay with a single class for multiple years, but Mr.
Osterweil’s decision to “loop” with us helped deepen our bonds.
When I didn’t feel love or security at home, I found them in Mr.
Osterweil’s classroom: It was a place I could be a kid, full of joy
and wonder, when I couldn’t be a kid at home.

After my father died, I moved around between schools and family
members. Thanks to great teachers, I always found solace in my
schoolwork. They would help me find an escape through a novel, push me
to make my way through a seemingly impossible math problem or
captivate my curiosity with a pig dissection or a debate about
American foreign policy in the Caribbean and Central America. And more
than that, they were the adults who provided stability, the source of
encouragement and reassurance that things might be OK.

Even with all that support, I struggled as a teenager, as do many
students who have experienced trauma, oscillating between intense
sadness and seething anger. I got in so much trouble that I was kicked
out of high school. It would have been easy for others to have looked
at me — a Black and Latino young man with a family in crisis and no
respect for authority — and given up, but I was lucky that teachers
and a school counselor were willing to give me a second chance. In
fact, I benefited from much the same kind of second chance prison
higher education programs seek to offer: the classroom as a place of
rebirth.

If not for the role teachers played in my life, I would never have
become a teacher, a principal or a member of President Barack
Obama’s cabinet. Teachers had more faith in me than I had in myself;
they changed my trajectory. But my story is not unique.

From our earliest days as a country, America has believed in public
education as a vehicle for upward mobility. From the one-room
schoolhouses of 18th century New England to the ambitious vision for
public higher education in Lincoln’s Morrill Land Grant Act of 1862,
from Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 to President George W. Bush
and Senator Ted Kennedy’s bipartisan No Child Left Behind law,
America has sought with each successive generation to expand the
circle of educational opportunity. The poor student, the immigrant,
the first-generation college student, the veteran or the single mother
working her way through community college: We have tried to make space
for them all, because we know access to education will enrich their
lives, expand our economy and strengthen our democracy.

Yet now the Trump administration and Elon Musk’s Department of
Government Efficiency are seeking to abandon education as a national
imperative. Whether it is purging half of the staff at the U.S.
Department of Education, threatening to eliminate the Head Start early
childhood education program, telling teachers to stop teaching the
hard parts of our history or slashing funding for research at our
universities, the Trump administration is trying to unravel one of our
greatest national achievements. This isn’t a debate about
efficiency; it is a debate about what kind of country we want to live
in. Should schools be improved? Of course. Are there federal education
programs that haven’t worked as intended that should be redesigned
or eliminated? Of course. But the Trump administration’s goal is to
destroy, not to improve.

In the face of student performance stuck below where it was before the
Covid pandemic began, a national crisis of chronic absenteeism,
spiking depression and anxiety among kids and teens, and yawning gaps
in achievement between low-income students and their more affluent
peers, we ought to be having a national conversation about how we find
and keep more teachers like the ones I had. We ought to be talking not
about dismantling the Department of Education but about making
teaching degrees free for people who commit to working in low-income
urban and rural communities or in hard-to-staff subjects. We ought to
be raising teacher pay and improving working conditions, ensuring that
there are enough counselors, especially in schools serving
neighborhoods afflicted by poverty and violence. We ought to be
figuring out how to create more space for inspiring teachers who want
to create new programs or school models — focused on arts, career
and technical education, learning multiple languages and more — that
will spark students’ passion for learning and make school a place
they want to be.

After all, protecting and accelerating the transformative power of
education is what’s essential — and irreplaceable — about the
federal role. Without the funding for vulnerable students the federal
government provides, teachers in schools serving low-income students
will be laid off and enrichment programs will be eliminated. Without
the Pell Grants and student loans the federal government administers,
low- and middle-income students will be locked out of higher
education. And without federal leadership safeguarding students’
civil rights, identifying schools that are succeeding (so their
practices can be scaled) and shining a spotlight on places that are
struggling (to ensure states and districts intervene), performance
gaps will never close.

At a time when we desperately need leadership and innovation that
values and lifts up great teaching, the Trump administration’s
campaign of destruction is going to make it harder to find and keep
the Mr. Osterweils of the world.

_John B. King Jr. is the chancellor of the State University of New
York, a former U.S. secretary of education and the author of
“Teacher by Teacher: The People Who Change Our Lives.”_

* Public Education
[[link removed]]
* Trump
[[link removed]]
* Elimination
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]