[[link removed]]

CAN DONALD TRUMP BUILD THE ‘GOLDEN DOME’ OVER THE US?  
[[link removed]]


 

Bernd Debusmann, Jr
May 23, 2025
BBC [[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

_ The Congressional Research Office, or CRS, has said that "hundreds
or thousands" of space-based platforms would be necessary to "provide
even a minimal defence" against incoming missiles - a potentially
enormously expensive proposition. _

Trump said the Golden Dome will be completed by the end of his term.,


 

Warheads raining down from beyond the Earth's atmosphere.
Faster-than-sound cruise missiles striking US infrastructure. Sky-high
nuclear blasts.

These are just some of the nightmarish scenarios that experts warn
could come true if the US's dated and limited defence systems were
overwhelmed in a future high-tech attack.

Even a single, relatively small nuclear detonation hundreds of miles
above the heads of Americans would create an electromagnetic pulse -
or EMP - that would have apocalyptic results. Planes would fall out of
the sky across the country. Everything from handheld electronics and
medical devices to water systems would be rendered completely useless.

"We wouldn't be going back 100 years," said William Fortschen, an
author and weapons researcher at Montreat College in North Carolina.
"We'd lose it all, and we don't know how to rebuild it. It would be
the equivalent of us going back 1,000 years and having to start from
scratch."

In response to these hypothetical - but experts say quite possible -
threats, US President Donald Trump has set his eyes on a "next
generation" missile shield: the Golden Dome.

But while many experts agree that building such a system is necessary,
its high cost and logistical complexity will make Trump's mission to
bolster America's missile defences extremely challenging.

An executive order calling for the creation of what was initially
termed the "Iron Dome for America" noted that the threat of
next-generation weapons has "become more intense and complex" over
time, a potentially "catastrophic" scenario for the US.

Patrycja Bazylczyk, a missile defence expert at the Washington
DC-headquartered Center for Strategic and International Studies, told
the BBC that existing systems are geared towards intercontinental
ballistic missiles, or ICBMs, such as those used by North Korea. But
powerful nations like Russia and China are also investing in newer
technologies that could strike not just neighbours, but adversaries an
ocean away.

Among the threats publicly identified by US defence officials
are hypersonic weapons able to move faster than the speed of sound
[[link removed]] and fractional
orbital bombardment systems - also called Fobs - that could deliver
warheads from space.

Each - even in limited numbers - are deadly.

"The Golden Dome sort of re-orients our missile defence policy towards
our great power competitors," Ms Bazylczyk said. "Our adversaries are
investing in long-range strike capabilities, including things that
aren't your typical missiles that we've been dealing with for years."

What will the 'Golden Dome' look like?

The White House and defence officials have so far provided few
concrete details about what the Golden Dome - which is still in its
conceptual stages - would actually look like.

Speaking alongside Trump in the Oval Office on 20 May, defence
secretary Pete Hegseth said only that the system will have multiple
layers "across the land, sea and space, including space-based sensors
and interceptors".

Trump added that the system will be capable of intercepting missiles
"even if they are launched from other sides of the world, and even if
they are launched in space", with various aspects of the programme
based as far afield as Florida, Indiana and Alaska.

In previous testimony in Congress, the newly named overseer of the
programme, Space Force General Michael Guetlein, said that the Golden
Dome will build on existing systems that are largely aimed at
traditional ICBMs. A new system would add multiple layers that could
also detect and defend against cruise missiles and other threats,
including by intercepting them before they launch or at the various
stages of their flight.

Currently, the US Missile Defence Agency largely relies on 44
ground-based interceptors based in Alaska and California, designed to
combat a limited missile attack.

Experts have warned that the existing system is woefully inadequate if
the US homeland were to be attacked by Russia and China, each of which
has an expanded arsenal of hundreds of ICBMs and thousands of cruise
missiles.

"[Current systems] were created for North Korea," said Dr Stacie
Pettyjohn, a defence expert at the Center for a New American Security.
"It could never intercept a big arsenal like Russia's, or even a much
smaller one like China's."

The Congressional Research Office, or CRS, has said that "hundreds or
thousands" of space-based platforms would be necessary to "provide
even a minimal defence" against incoming missiles - a potentially
enormously expensive proposition.

Israel's Iron Dome: an example?

Trump first revealed his concept for the Golden Dome during a joint
address to Congress in March, when he said that "Israel has it, other
places have it, and the United States should have it too".

The president was referring to Israel's "Iron Dome" system
[[link removed]], which the
country has used to intercept rockets and missiles since 2011.

Israel's Iron Dome, however, is designed to intercept shorter-range
threats, while two other systems - known as David's Sling and the
Arrow - combat larger ballistic missiles such as those that have been
fired by Iran and the Houthis in Yemen.

Ms Bazylczyk described the Iron Dome as geared towards "lower tier"
threats, such as rockets fired from Gaza or southern Lebanon.

The Golden Dome would go beyond that, to detect longer range missiles
as well, she said.

To accomplish that, she said it will need to combine different
capabilities.

"And I'll be looking out for the command and control system that can
weave all of this together," she said, noting that such a thing does
not currently exist.

Can it be done?

Creating that system will be an incredibly complicated - and costly -
proposition.

In the Oval Office, Trump suggested that the Golden Dome could be
completed by the end of his term, with a total cost of $175bn over
time, including an initial investment of $25bn already earmarked for
it.

His estimate is far out of sync with the CBO's, which has put the
potential price tag at $542bn over 20 years on the space-based systems
alone. Experts have said the total cost could eventually soak up a
large chunk of the massive US defence budget.

"I think that's unrealistic," said Dr Pettyjohn. "This is complicated,
with multiple systems that need to be integrated together. Every one
of those steps has its own risks, costs and schedules."

"And going fast is going to add more cost and risk," she added.
"You're likely to produce something that isn't going to be as
thoroughly evaluated... there are going to be failures along the way,
and what you produce may need major overhauls."

The creation of the Golden Dome has also sparked fears that it may
lead to a new "arms race", with US foes gearing up their own efforts
to find ways to overwhelm or circumvent its defences.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning, for example, told
reporters that the plan "heightens the risk of space becoming a
battlefield".

Those involved in researching worst-case scenarios and US defence
policy downplay these concerns. Potential foes, they argue, are
already investing heavily in offensive capabilities.

"The Golden Dome aims to change the strategic calculus of our
adversaries," said Ms Bazylczyk. "Improving homeland air and missile
defences reduces the confidence of a potential attacker in achieving
whatever objectives they seek."

"It raises the threshold for them to engage in this attack," she
added. "And it contributes to overall deterrence."

Even a partially completed Golden Dome, Mr Fortschen said, could
prevent a nightmare scenario from taking place.

"I will breathe a lot easier," he said. "We need that type of system.
The Golden Dome is the answer."

_[xxxxxx MODERATOR - RELATED:_ BAD NEWS FOR TRUMP’S GOLDEN DOME:
HE CAN’T BUILD IT WITHOUT CANADA
[[link removed]]
Jack Detsch, Paul McLeary and Nick Taylor-Vaisey
Politico
The president would need to rely on Ottawa to track Chinese and
Russian missiles that could come at the U.S. from over the horizon.
May 23, 2025_]_

_BERND DEBUSMANN JR is a senior journalist on the BBC World News
digital team. Bernd covers North America and is based in Washington
DC. He previously worked as a reporter for the BBC World News
[[link removed]]._

_The BBC is the world’s leading public service broadcaster_

_We’re impartial and independent, and every day we create
distinctive, world-class programmes and content which inform, educate
and entertain millions of people in the UK and around the world._

_We do this across:_

* _A portfolio of television services, including the UK’s
most-watched channel BBC One and our multi award-winning channels for
children, as well as national and regional television programmes and
services across England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales_
* _Ten UK-wide radio networks, providing the best live music
broadcasting in the UK, as well as speech radio which informs,
educates and entertains. We also have two national radio services each
in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and local radio stations
across England and the Channel Islands, providing an invaluable and
unique service to listeners across the UK_
* _Our digital services including BBC News, Sport, Weather CBBC and
CBeebies, iPlayer and BBC Sounds, BBC Red Button and our vast archive_
* _BBC World Service
[[link removed]] television,
radio and online on more than 40 languages_

_Established by a Royal Charter
[[link removed]], the BBC is
principally funded through the licence fee
[[link removed]] paid by UK
households. Our role is to fulfil our mission and promote our Public
Purposes [[link removed]]._

_Our commercial operations
[[link removed]] including
BBC Studios, the BBC’s award-winning production company and
world-class distributor, provide additional revenue for investment in
new programming and services for UK audiences._

_The BBC’s Board
[[link removed]] ensures that we
deliver our mission and public purposes which are set out in the
Charter. The Executive Committee
[[link removed]] is responsible for
day-to-day management. We are regulated by Ofcom
[[link removed]]._

* Golden Dome
[[link removed]]
* Donald Trump
[[link removed]]
* Missile Defense
[[link removed]]
* United States
[[link removed]]
* Israel
[[link removed]]
* Nuclear war
[[link removed]]

*
[[link removed]]
*
[[link removed]]
*
*
[[link removed]]

 

 

 

INTERPRET THE WORLD AND CHANGE IT

 

 

Submit via web
[[link removed]]

Submit via email
Frequently asked questions
[[link removed]]
Manage subscription
[[link removed]]
Visit xxxxxx.org
[[link removed]]

Twitter [[link removed]]

Facebook [[link removed]]

 




[link removed]

To unsubscribe, click the following link:
[link removed]