Voters are suing to stop a Florida law that makes it harder to participate in the ballot initiative process.

View in browser ([link removed] )

NL-Header_OTD-4 ([link removed] )

Friday, May 23



The mainstream press plays both sides — we play on the side that's pro-democracy. Join Democracy Docket premium ([link removed] ) and help fund fearless journalism for $10/month.



THIS WEEK

- Floridians fighting for direct democracy

- SCOTUS rejects a GOP bid to undo Michigan’s pro-voter reforms

- Trial begins challenging Texas maps as racially biased

FLORIDA

Voters fight for their right to pass ballot initiatives

Voters in multiple states have approved ([link removed] ) ballot measures protecting their rights or advancing progressive reforms. GOP lawmakers would prefer voters didn’t have that option.

Earlier this month, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) signed into law HB 1205, which makes it harder to get measures on the ballot, and has prompted a legal challenge ([link removed] ) from advocates and voters. A hearing in the case, Florida Decides Healthcare v. Byrd, was held Thursday, with the plaintiffs asking the court to block the law.

Arkansas, Idaho, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, South Dakota and Utah have all tried to crack down on ballot initiatives, too. But Florida’s law is perhaps the harshest.

It imposes “vague, punitive, and excessive” restrictions on the initiative process, the complaint charges, such as stricter deadlines and new eligibility criteria for petition gatherers.

Read more about the case here. ([link removed] )

MICHIGAN

SCOTUS declines to hear GOP case against Michigan’s pro-voter reforms

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Republicans’ request to hear their challenge ([link removed] ) to pro-voter amendments to the Michigan Constitution, approved by voters in 2018 and 2022.

Michiganders overwhelmingly ([link removed] )) passed a 2018 ballot measure ([link removed] ) that made voting easier by establishing automatic voter registration, no-reason absentee voting and straight-party voting. By a wide margin ([link removed] )) , voters approved additional changes ([link removed] ) in 2022: nine days of early voting, prepaid ballot postage, access to absentee-ballot drop boxes and more.

Eleven GOP state lawmakers filed ([link removed] ) suit to nullify the amendments. Using the radical independent state legislature theory ([link removed] ) , they argued that only state legislatures – not citizens – have the authority to set rules for federal elections.

A federal district court judge dismissed ([link removed] ) the case in April last year. Then, in December, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed ([link removed] ) that ruling.

Now, with SCOTUS declining to hear the case, the amendments will remain in effect. And voting will be easier in Michigan. Read more about the Michigan legal challenge. ([link removed] )

TEXAS

Trial underway in Texas consolidated lawsuits

With over 18 million registered voters and 268,820 square miles, even the redistricting lawsuits in Texas are sprawling.

Trial began this week in a set of consolidated lawsuits ([link removed] ) challenging the state’s congressional, legislative and other state-level redistricting maps. It’s expected to last several weeks.

The case is just one of many alleging racial bias in voting that the U.S. Department of Justice has dropped ([link removed] ) since President Donald Trump took office, along with legal challenges in Georgia ([link removed] ) , Louisiana ([link removed] ) , Virginia ([link removed] ) and others.

The move is part of the Trump administration’s overhaul of the DOJ – cutting staff, reassigning attorneys and shifting focus from enforcing voting rights to finding voter fraud. The voting section has dwindled ([link removed] ) to just three attorneys, according to an estimate provided to Democracy Docket by Justice Connection, a new watchdog group.

Despite the DOJ’s withdrawal, private plaintiffs, including the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), are continuing their case against Texas’ maps. In a complaint first filed in 2021, LULAC and other groups argued the state’s redistricting plans “unlawfully dilute the voting strength of Latinos.”

The case involves multiple maps, multiple plaintiffs and VRA and racial gerrymandering claims.

Read more about the Texas redistricting lawsuits here. ([link removed] )

OPINION

To Impose Abortion Ban, Missouri GOP Aims to Stymie Direct Democracy

Screenshot 2025-05-22 at 4.15.01 PM ([link removed] )

Missourians approved a ballot measure in November officially enshrining their abortion rights in the state constitution. But the GOP-controlled state legislature this week put a referendum on the ballot that would effectively repeal the will of the voters.

Not only would the referendum undermine the will of the voters, but it’s also written using deceptive ([link removed] ) language that makes it seem like it’s protecting abortions in certain circumstances. In reality, the procedure is already legal and the measure actually is limiting abortions to only those exceptions.

“HJR 73 is a cynical attempt to dupe voters into believing they’re granting more exceptions to abortion laws when they’d really be allowing abortion bans,” writes Susan Rinkunas. Read more here. ([link removed] )

NEW VIDEO

Democrats’ Plan to Stop the SAVE Act, DOGE | Sen. Alex Padilla

California Senator Alex Padilla foiled Republicans’ attempt to pass the SAVE Act this week. Sen. Padilla joins Marc to discuss protecting voters’ information from DOGE, his experience expanding ballot access as California’s secretary of state and the work Senate Democrats are doing to fight voter suppression. Watch it on YouTube here. ([link removed] )

What We’re Doing

One thing about living through the second Trump administration is there’s no shortage of reading. The newest book on Democracy Docket reporter Jacob Knutson’s TBR is “Lawless ([link removed] ) : How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes.” It’s written by Leah Litman, a professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School. If you like your legal analysis to include vibes, this book could be for you.

Facebook ([link removed] )

X ([link removed] )

Instagram ([link removed] )

Bluesky_Logo-grey (2) ([link removed] )

YouTube ([link removed] )

Website ([link removed] )

TikTok ([link removed] )

This is one of our free weekly newsletters. If you were forwarded this email, you can subscribe to our newsletters here ([link removed] ) .

Unsubscribe ([link removed] ) | Manage Preferences ([link removed] )

Democracy Docket, LLC

250 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 400

Washington, D.C., 20009