Federal
Court Orders Additional Information on Biden USAID Gaza
Aid

U.S. District Judge Reggie B.
Walton has ordered
the State Department to explain its claim that the recipients of a
Biden-era United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Gaza
aid grant cannot be disclosed because the agency’s workers could be put
at risk by Israel.
This week at a court hearing on the issue Judge
Walton was incredulous at the State
Department’s argument, as it necessarily implied that it is the U.S.
Government’s position that U.S. ally Israel would purposely target and
kill innocent aid workers in Gaza The order comes in a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
seeking records from USAID regarding $27 million in grants allocated to
“Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees” for use in Gaza.
Judge
Walton’s order
calls for a supplemental explanation regarding USAID’s reliance on FOIA
Exemption 6, which protects against unwarranted invasions of personal
privacy, in order to hide the recipients of the Biden USAID grant made
shortly after the Hamas mass murder, rape, and kidnapping of Israeli and
American
citizens:
[T]he defendant shall file at least one
supplemental declaration explaining the defendant’s basis for asserting
that its grant recipient— information about which the defendant seeks to
withhold from disclosure citing Exemption 6 to the Freedom of Information
Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552—and its affiliates could be targeted if
the information requested by the plaintiff were released. Specifically, the
Court requires more than a general assertion that aid workers have been
targeted or harmed in the Gaza Strip in order to make a determination as to
whether FOIA Exemption 6 should apply to the information at issue here,
including for example, an explanation of who might target the grant
recipient or its affiliates, and the kind of targeting about which the
defendant is concerned. It is further ORDERED that, on May 27, 2025, at
11:00 a.m., the parties shall appear before the Court for a motion
hearing.
This is incredible. I attended the court
hearing. The State and Justice Departments continue to cover up who in Gaza
received American tax dollars from the Biden administration. The government
has turned a simple FOIA case into a foreign policy scandal.
Were
terror-linked groups funded by USAID? It sure looks that way. Moreover, why
are the State and Justice Departments pushing leftist smears against Israel
in federal court? Secretary Rubio and Attorney General Bondi need to ride
herd and stop this cover-up justified by a sly Deep State libel of
Israel.
On October 7, 2023, Hamas—a U.S.-designated terrorist
organization—invaded
southwest Israel, killing over a thousand people and kidnapping
hundreds of others.
We sued
in July 2024 after the USAID failed to respond to an April 2, 2024, FOIA
request (Judicial
Watch v. U.S. Agency for International Development (No.
1:24-cv-02159)) that asks for:
- All records
identifying the recipients of USAID funding under the $7,000,000 grant
allocation awarded on or about November 15, 2023, and associated with
Federal Award Identification Number 720BHA24GR00005.
- All proposals,
applications, scope of work documents, or similar records related to any
grant award or sub-award associated with Federal Award Identification
Number 720BHA24GR00005.
USAID has produced records
but refuses to disclose what organizations received the money.
On
November 15, 2023, the Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance, a component of
the USAID, issued a $7
million grant for “multisectoral response in Gaza.” The grant was
awarded to “Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees.” The same day a “continuation”
grant of $20 million was also issued for “multisectoral response.”
USAID reported
that over $282 million was obligated to the West Bank and Gaza in fiscal
year 2023.
It was recently discovered that USAID provided millions of
dollars in funding to extremist groups tied to designated terrorist
organizations and
their allies, according to a
report published by Middle East Forum, a U.S. think tank.
In July
2024, the Office of the Inspector General for USAID issued
a report titled “Assessment of USAID’s Oversight Policies to
Prevent the
Diversion of Assistance to Hamas and Other Terrorist Organizations” in
which it states:
The USAID Office of Inspector General
(USAID OIG) provides independent oversight of USAID’s programs,
operations, and personnel and has previously identified
USAID-funded assistance to Gaza as being at high risk for diversion and
misuse.
***
Regarding the UN’s processes for vetting
their own staff, USAID Administrator Samantha Power noted—following
allegations that officials
working for UNRWA [United Nations Relief and Works Agency] engaged in the
October 7, 2023 attacks in Israel—“obviously the vetting is something
that has to be significantly strengthened.”
We have
also sued
USAID for records regarding waste, fraud and abuse tied to aid money sent
to Ukraine.
In 2018, we obtained State Department documents
showing top Soros representatives in Romania collaborating with the State
Department in a program jointly funded
by, among others, Soros’s Open
Society Foundations – Romania and USAID, called the “Open
Government Partnership.”
Additional State Department records
uncovered in 2018 showed USAID funding for George Soros’s left-wing
nonprofit organizations in Albania. The documents dealt primarily with the
activities of Soros’ top operative in Albania, Andri Dobrushi, the
director of Open Society Foundation-Albania, who was actively engaged in
channeling funding to what Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban calls
Soros’ “mercenary army.” The documents showed U.S. grant money
flowing through non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) that profess to promote “civil society,” while in
fact attacking traditional, pro-American groups, governments and
policies.
Other records
related to the USAID’s activities in Albania showed that the Obama
administration sent U.S. taxpayers’ funds to a group backed by Soros,
which used the money to fund left-wing political activities in Albania,
including working with the country’s socialist government to push for
highly controversial judicial “reform.” The records also
detailed how the Soros operation helped the State Department review grant
applications from other groups for taxpayer
funding.
Biden Administration Covid Vaccination
Mandate Revealed
We continue to uncover the Biden regime’s
maliciousness on Covid vaccine mandates.
We received 91
pages of records from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit that reveal its plans to
mandate Covid-19 vaccinations for 17 million health care
employees.
Moreover, the documents show that only one of 4,682 claims
for injuries
and deaths due to Covid-19 “countermeasures” at the time was
compensated.
We filed the September 2024 lawsuit
in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after Health and
Human Services failed to respond to a July 2024 FOIA request for the
records of Assistant Secretary Rachel Levine and other officials regarding
the removal of the minimum age for the treatment of children in the World
Professional Association for Transgender Health’s (WPATH) 2022 standards
of care (Judicial
Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No.
1:24-cv-02588)).
They include a November 4, 2021, “Memorandum
for the Cabinet Secretary” prepared for Biden administration Health
and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra
that reveals a “CLOSE HOLD” (emphasis in original) disclosure that
Health and Human Services planned to mandate that 17 million health care
employees receive the Covid-19 vaccine:
On November
4th, CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] will
release an emergency regulation requiring staff vaccinations for 15
specific health care provider and supplier types participating in Medicare
and Medicaid programs to address the urgent need to protect patients
against COVID-19. These requirements will apply to approximately 50,000
providers and cover more than 17 million health care workers…. Sixty days
after the publication of the regulation, staff for all health care provider
and supplier types included in the regulation must be fully
vaccinated.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services mandated
the Covid vaccine for all its facilities in November 2021.
The memo
additionally describes “Covid-19 Compensation
Claims:”
As of November 1st, 4,682 claims alleging
injuries/deaths from COVID-19 countermeasures have been filed with the
Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, including 2,229 claims
alleging injuries from COVID-19 vaccines; an increase of 133 in total
claims over the prior week. About 90 percent of claims are awaiting medical
records for review. To date, 91 claims are in medical review, 3 claims
have been denied compensation, 1 claim has been determined medically
eligible for compensation; however, the program is still working with the
claimant to obtain the necessary information to determine the compensation
amount.
The memo discusses an “Office of Population
Affairs” (OPA) that is involved in “family planning.” The office was
to receive $35 million “to support telehealth enhancement and expansion
in the Title X program to mitigate access barriers to quality family
planning services for clients, especially for vulnerable and hard to reach
populations.”
The memo describes a special Covid vaccine testing
program in “Indian Country” within the United
States:
Vaccines and Testing in Indian Country: IHS
[Indian Health Service], tribal, and urban Indian program sites receiving
the vaccine through the IHS have reported administering 1,722,756 doses of
the COVID-19 vaccine as
of October 31st
The memo makes multiple
references to the Biden administration’s “Build Back Better”
initiative. In discussing “underserved communities,” the memo
references “ACF ECD [Administration for Children and Families / Early
Childhood Development] Discusses Build Back Better Agenda at Tribal
Consultation.”
We are the national leader in exposing key
information about fraud, abuse, and government secrets about
Covid-19:
- Records uncovered in 2024 from the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI) through a FOIA request showed an April 2020
email exchange with several officials in the bureau’s Newark Field Office
referring to Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergies and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)
in China as including “gain-of-function
research” which “would leave no signature of purposeful human
manipulation.”
- Records from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) showed that a Pfizer study surveyed 23 people in 2021 to gauge
reactions to its Covid vaccine booster before
asking the FDA to approve it.
- Records
from the Health and Human Services included the initial grant application
and annual reports to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from EcoHealth
Alliance, describing the aim of its work with the Wuhan Institute of
Virology to create mutant viruses “to better predict the capacity of our
CoVs [coronaviruses] to infect people.”
- Health and Human Services
records included emails
of then-Director of the National Institutes of Health Francis Collins
showing a British physicians’ group recommended the use of Ivermectin to
prevent and treat Covid-19.
- Records
from Health and Human Services regarding data Moderna submitted to the Food
and Drug
Administration on its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine indicated a “statistically
significant” number of rats were born with skeletal deformities after
their mothers were injected with the vaccine. The documents also revealed
Moderna elected not to conduct a number of standard pharmacological studies
on the laboratory test animals.
- Food and Drug Administration
records detailed pressure
for Covid-19 vaccine booster approval and use.
- NIH records revealed
an FBI “inquiry” into the NIH’s controversial bat coronavirus grant
tied to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The records also show National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) officials were
concerned about “gain-of-function” research in China’s Wuhan
Institute of Virology in 2016. The Fauci agency was also concerned about EcoHealth
Alliance’s lack of compliance with reporting rules and use of
gain-of-function research in the NIH-funded research involving bat
coronaviruses in Wuhan, China.
- HHS records revealed that from 2014
to 2019, $826,277
was given to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research
by the NIAID.
- NIAID records showed that it gave
nine China-related grants to EcoHealth Alliance to research coronavirus
emergence in bats and was the NIH’s top issuer of grants to the Wuhan lab
itself. The records also included an email from the vice director of the
Wuhan Lab asking an NIH official for help finding disinfectants for
decontamination of airtight suits and indoor surfaces.
- HHS records
included an “urgent
for Dr. Fauci ” email chain, citing ties between the Wuhan lab and
the taxpayer-funded EcoHealth
Alliance. The government emails also reported that the foundation of
U.S. billionaire Bill Gates worked closely with the Chinese government to
pave the way for Chinese-produced medications to be sold outside China and
help “raise China’s voice of governance by placing
representatives from China on important international counsels as high
level commitment from China.”
- HHS records included a grant
application for research involving the coronavirus that appeared to
describe “gain-of-function”
research involving RNA extractions from bats, experiments on viruses,
attempts to develop a chimeric virus and efforts to genetically manipulate
the full-length bat SARSr-CoV WIV1 strain molecular clone.
- HHS
records showed the State Department and NIAID knew immediately in January
2020
that China
was withholding COVID data, which was hindering risk assessment and
response by public health officials.
- University of Texas Medical
Branch (UTMB) records
showed the former director of the Galveston National Laboratory at the
University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), James
W. Le Duc warned Chinese researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology
of potential investigations into the Covid issue by Congress.
- HHS
records regarding biodistribution studies and related data for the Covid-19
vaccines showed a key component of the vaccines developed by
Pfizer/BioNTech, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), were found outside
the injection site, mainly the liver, adrenal glands, spleen and
ovaries of test animals, eight to 48 hours after injection.
- Records
from the Federal Select Agent Program (FSAP) revealed safety
lapses and violations at U.S. biosafety laboratories that conduct
research on dangerous agents and toxins.
- HHS records included emails
between National Institutes of Health (NIH) then-Director Francis
Collins and Fauci, the director of National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID), about hydroxychloroquine and
Covid-19.
- HHS records showed that NIH
officials tailored
confidentiality forms to China’s terms and that the World Health
Organization (WHO) conducted an unreleased, “strictly confidential”
Covid-19 epidemiological analysis in January 2020.
- Fauci emails
included his approval of a press release supportive of China’s response
to the 2019 novel coronavirus.
- Our four-part
documentary regarding the coordinated effort by the government and Big
Tech to censor and suppress information on topics such as Hunter Biden’s
laptop, Covid-19, and election debates is available here.
Judicial
Watch Sues IRS over Potential Targeting of January 6
Protesters
We filed a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit
against the IRS to obtain records related to possible improper targeting of
January 6, 2021, Capitol protesters, their supporters, and related
nonprofits (Judicial
Watch v. Internal Revenue Service (No. 1:25-cv-01290)).
We
sued in the U.S. District Court
for the District of Columbia after the IRS failed to respond to a January
22, 2025, FOIA request for the records of IRS officials, including former
Commissioner Daniel Werfel, Acting Commissioner Douglas O’Donnell, Chief
Tax Compliance Officer Heather Maloy and others that mention President
Trump or his pardons of the Capitol protesters plus all records referring
to plans for audits of the protesters, their supporters or related
nonprofits.
On January 19, 2024, National Public Radio published
“IRS is called to look into nonprofit for Jan. 6 rioters,” in which it
reported:
Democratic Congress members are calling for the
IRS to scrutinize a nonprofit that supports defendants charged in the Jan.
6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol and has close ties to the Trump
campaign…. The Patriot Freedom Project provides financial help to January
6 defendants and describes them as, quote, “political prisoners.” The
group is organized as a charity under section 501(c)(3) of the tax
code.
Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) also sought
a broad IRS investigation of groups allegedly associated with the
January 6 protests.
The IRS has a demonstrated record, as proven by
Judicial Watch, of abusing taxpayers at the behest of politicians. The IRS
obviously has the January 6 documents – so, why the cover-up?
In
2022, we obtained sealed court
documents revealing that former IRS officials Lois Lerner and Holly
Paz, who led efforts targeting Tea Party groups, acknowledged internally
that most of those organizations were legally entitled to tax-exempt status
in the lead-up to President Obama’s 2012 reelection.
In 2018, we
obtained IRS
records that contained material revealing that Sen. John McCain’s
former staff director and chief counsel on the Senate Homeland Security
Permanent Subcommittee, Henry Kerner, urged top IRS officials, including
Lerner, to “audit so many [conservative groups] that it becomes
financially ruinous.” Kerner
was appointed by President Trump as special counsel for the United
States Office of Special Counsel.
We had previously
reported on the 2013 meeting. Senator McCain then
issued a statement decrying “false reports claiming that his office
was
somehow involved in IRS targeting of conservative groups.” The IRS had
blacked out the notes
of the meeting but we found the notes among subsequent documents
released by the agency.
We separately
uncovered that Lerner was under significant pressure from both
Democrats in Congress and the Obama DOJ and FBI to prosecute and jail the
groups the IRS was already improperly targeting. In discussing
pressure from Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) to prosecute these
“political groups,” Lerner admitted, “it is ALL about 501(c)(4) orgs
and political activity.”
The April 2013 meeting came just under two
weeks prior to Lerner’s admission during an American Bar Association
(ABA) meeting that the IRS had
“inappropriately” targeted conservative groups. In her May
2013 answer to a planted
question, in which she admitted to the “absolutely incorrect,
insensitive, and inappropriate” targeting of Tea Party and conservative
groups, Lerner suggested the IRS targeting
occurred due to an “uptick” in 501 (c)(4) applications to the IRS but
in actuality, there had been a decrease
in such applications in 2010.
In May 2013, a report by Treasury Inspector
General for Tax Administration revealed: “Early in Calendar Year
2010, the IRS began using inappropriate criteria to identify organizations
applying for tax-exempt status” (e.g., lists of past and future donors).
The illegal IRS reviews continued “for more than 18 months” and
“delayed processing of targeted groups’ applications” in advance of
the 2012 presidential
election.
ICE Takes Custody of Only 14% of Illegal Immigrants in
Local Jails
We’re puzzled by something
that appears in the
government’s figures on illegal aliens detained by local law enforcement.
As our Corruption Chronicles blog reports,
ICE appears far behind in picking them up.
Inconsistent
with the Trump administration’s actions of securing the southwest border
and mass deportations to crack down on illegal immigration is a strange
failure to take custody of illegal aliens arrested by local police under a
federal-local partnership known as 287(g).
Under the policy local and state law enforcement agencies notify
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) of jail inmates in the country
illegally and honor ICE requests—detainers—to hold undocumented
migrants for up to 48 hours beyond the time they would ordinarily release
them so the agency can take custody and deport them. The Biden
administration drastically diminished the measure but under Trump
cooperation has skyrocketed and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
recently celebrated
a “317% increase in federal/state partner agreements” that has resulted
in hundreds of migrant apprehensions, including violent gang members,
murderers, rapists and drug traffickers.
The
program, which currently has 517 participants in 39 states, operates under
three models, including jail enforcement designed to identify and process
removal of aliens with criminal or pending criminal charges, task force to
allow law enforcement agencies to enforce limited immigration authority
during routine police duties and a warrant service officer program that
permits ICE to
train, certify and authorize local officers to serve and execute
administrative warrants on aliens in their jail. The latest 287(g) monthly
encounter report
published by ICE includes alarming examples of criminal aliens deported
under the program thanks to local authorities around the
country—including in Arizona, Florida, Arkansas, North Carolina, Georgia,
Texas and Massachusetts—and emphasizes how 287(g) enhances the safety and
security of communities by creating partnerships with local police to
identify and remove illegal aliens from the United States. “The mutually
beneficial agreements allow
state and local law enforcement to act as a force multiplier in the
identification, arrest, and service of warrants and detainers on
foreign-born individuals arrested on local criminal charges,” ICE writes
in the report.
But government figures reveal
that only 14% of illegal immigrants in local jails with ICE detainers have
been taken into custody by the federal agency, despite the sharp increase
in detainers issued since Trump took office. During Trump’s first
presidency ICE assumed custody of 62% of illegal immigrants in local jails,
according to the stats, which are featured in a new report
published by Syracuse
University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), a
nonpartisan data research center dedicated to studying the inner workings
of the federal government. The data shows that, during the first 29 days of
the second Trump administration the number of daily ICE detainers rose to
654 compared to just 380 during the same 29-day period under Biden. The
average daily number of detainers issued rose from 654 during the first 29
days to 715 during the subsequent 29 days, through March 18, 2025, the
records show. “Often, ICE did not follow through and take these
individuals into custody,” TRAC researchers
found.
Most ICE detainers (44%) were issued
against illegal immigrants from Mexico, with Guatemalans second at 11% and
Hondurans 10%. The TRAC report breaks down the government figures by state
and city. During the period analyzed ICE issued 3,450 detainers in Texas
but only took 428 of the
illegal aliens into custody. California was second with 3,203 detainers
during the first 29 days of the second Trump administration and just 63
taken into federal custody for removal. In Florida ICE issued 1,891
detainers and took 607 into custody and in Georgia the agency issued 922
detainers while taking 146 into custody. Cities with the most detainers
include Houston, Texas (557), Miami, Florida (467), Phoenix, Arizona (394),
Los Angeles, California (317), Dallas (268), San Antonio (241), and Austin
(222) Texas. Strangely, ICE did not take custody of any of the hundreds of
illegal immigrants held in local jails in Houston, San Antonio or Austin
and took custody of only one of the 317 arrested in Los
Angeles.
This appears to contradict the
agency’s long-standing claim that detainers “are an essential tool
needed to apprehend and deport individuals not authorized to remain in the
U.S.” The TRAC
report says, “ICE did not release any information that might explain why
the number of individuals taken into custody precipitously dropped.”
Nevertheless, the figures confirm that as the agency “cranked up the
daily number of detainers it sent out,” fewer illegal immigrants were
taken into custody from local law enforcement agencies compared to
Trump’s first term.
Until next
week,
