View this post on the web at [link removed]

Laura Ingraham hammered Democrat Rep. Yassamin Ansari on Fox News [ [link removed] ] for flying to El Salvador to virtue signal her support for illegal immigrant and alleged MS-13 member Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
”What process do you think is still due an individual who two courts found had reasonable belief he had an affiliation with MS-13,” Ingraham started, “who’s wife initially said had scratched her and caused bruising on her body,…”
“What process would make you feel like the Constitution and our framers’ understanding of it would be fulfilled?” Ingraham asked Ansari.
The Democrat denied that she was specifically advocating for Abrego Garcia.
“You went to El Salvador, what are you talking about?!!” Ingraham immediately fired back. “Now you’re saying it’s not about him?! Of course it’s about him!”
Ingraham continued to hammer the backpedaling Dem, [ [link removed] ] “You went to El Salvador for a political stunt and now you’re saying it’s not about him!”
Ansari pushed back, explaining how she has never received more calls from constituents than about the issue of deportations “without due process,… tariffs being the second one.”
“The violence committed by illegal immigrants against American citizens and legal immigrants has been appalling and I wish there was one moment when Democrats acted like they cared about that!” Ingraham sounded off.
Watch the full Fox News clash here:
Together With Next Things Technologies [ [link removed] ]
Does your neck hurt from all that whiplash?
On April 9th, markets threw a massive party - one of the biggest rallies since WWII.
Why? Trump paused some of the scariest tariff hikes for most countries. But on April 10th, markets plunged. Dow down nearly 1,000 points. Nasdaq tumbling.
Why? The China trade fight didn’t pause - it escalated. Badly.
Tariffs on Chinese goods reportedly jumped to over 100%. China fired back with 84% tariffs on U.S. goods. The U.S. doubled down - raising tariffs to 125%.
JP Morgan called it “merely the end of the beginning.” The problem hasn’t vanished. What does that mean? The potential cost explosion is still very real for phones, clothes, gadgets… and especially batteries.
Like lithium batteries powering almost everything - still mostly processed in China. Imagine 125% tariffs on those. What happens to EV battery prices? Home backup systems?
This kind of shockwave forces a hard truth: Relying on fragile global supply chains is a losing game. America must build critical tech here. Especially batteries. Securely. Affordably.
This is exactly why Next Thing Technologies [ [link removed] ] [ [link removed] ]exists. We’ve focused on non-lithium batteries since 2019. Our chemistry of choice after 4+ years of research? Sodium - abundant in the U.S., Enough to last hundreds of thousands of years.
So, when tariffs make lithium batteries impossibly expensive, our domestic solution becomes the obvious choice.
Affordable. Secure. American-made.
We built our strategy for this exact moment. For a world where domestic energy isn't a luxury - but essential.
This isn't “lucky.” It’s strategy meeting perfect timing. That said, “lucky” for you…
…You can invest in our campaign now.
<< CLICK HERE TO INVEST >> [ [link removed] ]
We're the only U.S. company developing sodium-ion batteries that anyone can invest in through public crowdfunding*
Check out our campaign page here if you haven’t seen it [ [link removed] ]
Tom Homan WRECKS Chris Cuomo for accusing him of breaking the law…
Tom Homan stood his ground on News Nation when Chris Cuomo claimed he was “ignoring” withholding orders [ [link removed] ] for illegal migrants connected to criminal gangs.
“You’re ignoring orders when you’re told you can’t deport this person, and then you’re deporting them anyway,… why ignore the orders?!” Cuomo pressed Homan.
“No one is ignoring the order!” Homan said. “The ‘Maryland father’ was ordered deported twice, by two immigration judges!” Homan listed the numerous sources that confirmed the illegal migrant’s affiliation with criminal gangs. “He is now a terrorists!”
Watch their tense discussion here:
Radical leftist calls for the killing of Trump officials, then learns a valuable lesson
By Julio Rosas [ [link removed] ]
Substack is a great platform not just because it allows independent writers the ability to build something for themselves, but it also allows those same writers to be honest with how they really feel. However, their honesty can sometimes come back to haunt them in the real world.
The most recent example of this is that of Nicholas Decker. A George Mason PhD student, Decker recently wrote on his Substack [ [link removed] ] asking his fellow leftists when is it enough to start killing members and supporters of the Trump administration.
Decker, while seemingly gleeful at the prospect, frames his desires with apparent reluctance:
“Evil has come to America. The present administration is engaged in barbarism…If the present administration chooses this course, then the questions of the day can be settled not with legislation, but with blood and iron. In short, we must decide when we must kill them. None of us wish for war, but if the present administration wishes to destroy the nation I would accept war rather than see it perish. I hope that you would choose the same.”
Decker made it abundantly clear his desire to kill the MAGA movement goes beyond taking out President Donald Trump…
PolitiBrawl is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Legal Disclaimer:
An offering statement regarding this offering has been filed with the SEC. The SEC has qualified
that offering statement, which only means that the company may make sales of the securities described by the
offering statement. The offering circular that is part of that offering statement is available here.
Forward-Looking Statements Disclaimer: The offering materials and this email may contain forward-looking
statements and information relating to, among other things, the company, its business plan and strategy, and its
industry. These forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of, assumptions made by, and information
currently available to the company’s management. When used in the offering materials, the words “estimate,”
“project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements, which constitute forward looking statements. These statements reflect management’s current views with
respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the company’s actual results to
differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. The company
does not undertake any obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances after such date or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Investing in emerging technologies involves risks, including the possibility of loss. For a detailed description of
specific risks, please refer to our offering circular. View the offering circular.
Rainmaker Ad Ventures is paid by Next Thing Technologies for promoting their offering. Payment is in cash and billed
monthly. As of the end of March, Rainmaker has received $0. Additional fees may have accrued since then.

Unsubscribe [link removed]?