When Joseph’s brothers sold him into slavery, they did not try to hide from themselves their evil intentions. To cover their crime, though, they told their father the boy had been killed and eaten by wild animals.
Yet, as we learn in the Book of Genesis, their evil intentions resulted in a regional good: Joseph rose from a slave to one of the most powerful men in Egypt. From that position, Joseph saved millions of lives, including those of his brothers and their families.
I could not help but think of those evil brothers as I pondered the actions of the Texas House leadership in the opening moves of their budget negotiations.
Reform-minded lawmakers had prepared a series of amendments
that would draw money from the scandal-plagued money laundering enterprise known as the Texas Lottery to property tax relief and other notable causes.
The Lottery was never intended to be a social good. Advocates told bald-faced lies promoting it in the late 1980s and early 1990s with claims that it would fund public education. A chief proponent of the Lottery was Democrat Gov. Ann Richards, who never intended the cash to go to the schools. After she was booted from office, and the citizenry realized they had been hoodwinked, lawmakers finally pointed a mere pittance of the revenues into the schools. Since then, the lottery’s annual contribution to education is a rounding error in the state’s $330 billion budget.
The Lottery has quite successfully become a sophisticated
money-laundering operation, just like the early 20th-century mobs created with their casinos in the Nevada desert. The only difference is that, with the Texas Lottery, our state government has been a willing co-conspirator.
The money laundering has been achieved by dangling the mathematically impossible hope of a jackpot in front of financially illiterate Texans. Then, when the jackpot gets big enough, the laundering occurs with shadowy enterprises allowed to game the system and walk off with money cleaned by the State of Texas.
So, with the prospect of lawmakers having to choose between funding an illicit operation of state government and more worthwhile causes, the House leadership made a gamble. They didn’t want lawmakers voting for good things, so a leftwing Democrat was
enlisted by the lead budget writer, Republican Greg Bonnen of Friendswood, to offer a hastily drawn amendment at the outset of the debate. The Bonnen-approved amendment simply defunded the Lottery.
How could that be bad? There was no intention by the House leadership to actually defund the agency. Remember, the Senate’s version of the state budget had fully funded the Lottery. The House honchos wanted to deny reformers the chance to put anything good on the record. They knew they could quietly add the money back in later.
Yet, what was intended for evil has quickly become a very public good. Rather than sulk after being outfoxed by Bonnen, the reformers simply reset the narrative. They leaned into the curve thrown at them and forced their fellow House members to go on the record with a
vote. Overwhelmingly, members affirmed the zero-dollar budget for the corrupt Texas Lottery.
In the official voice of the House itself, the Republican majority has said the Texas Lottery should not be funded. If the funding reappears in the coming weeks, it will be because Gov. Greg Abbott or the Senate put their fingers on the scales behind the closed doors of the state’s budget reconciliation process.
If so, they will personally own the next set of scandals at the agency that are already starting to break. The House has said they want no part of it.
Texans should no longer be forced to subsidize a corrupt money laundering scheme. Regardless of the bad intentions that got us here, it is good and right that the Texas Lottery should now
die.