SCOTUS Poised to Uphold Parental Rights in Curriculum Opt-Out Case:

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here
[[link removed]]
for more

[ACT For America]
[[link removed]]


[Share]
[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]
[Browser]
[[link removed]]

SCOTUS POISED TO UPHOLD PARENTAL RIGHTS IN CURRICULUM OPT-OUT CASE:

_Time to Ban LGBTQ and Sexualization of Children_

In June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to rule on _Mahmoud v.
Taylor_, a pivotal case involving parental rights to opt their
children out of public school curricula featuring LGBTQ-themed
materials. Early indications suggest the Court’s conservative
majority will rule in favor of parents, reinforcing their authority
over their children’s education. This case, stemming from Montgomery
County, Maryland, challenges the school board’s removal of opt-out
options for lessons on sexuality and gender identity, impacting
children as young as three. A ruling for parents would reaffirm a
long-standing constitutional tradition prioritizing parental
rights—a tradition that should extend to all parents, not just those
with religious objections.

The Court’s history on parental rights is clear and robust. In
_Meyer v. Nebraska_ (1923), the Court recognized parents’ liberty to
“establish a home and bring up children” under the Fourteenth
Amendment’s Due Process Clause. _Pierce v. Society of Sisters_
(1925) solidified this, affirming parents’ rights to direct their
children’s education by choosing private schools. _Wisconsin v.
Yoder_ (1972) went further, ruling that parents’ “fundamental
interest” in guiding their children’s religious and educational
upbringing trumps state interests, allowing Amish parents to opt out
of compulsory schooling. _Troxel v. Granville_ (2000) underscored that
the “liberty interest” in the care, custody, and control of
children is “perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty
interests.” These precedents demonstrate that parental rights are
nearly absolute, rooted in the Constitution’s protection of family
autonomy, and have been overwhelmingly upheld.

This case should not hinge on religious objections alone. All parents,
regardless of faith, must have the right to opt out of curricula they
deem harmful. Montgomery County’s inclusion of books like _My
Rainbow_, depicting transgender experiences, raises serious concerns.
These materials often diverge from the Judeo-Christian values that
shaped America’s founding—values centered on traditional families
with a mother and father as the bedrock of society. Introducing young
children to concepts of gender fluidity can sow confusion,
particularly when over 90% of gender dysphoria cases resolve naturally
by puberty, according to studies like those cited by the American
Psychiatric Association. Encouraging children who do not struggle with
gender identity to experiment risks leading them down a painful path
of mental health challenges, including depression and anxiety, which
studies show afflict many who pursue gender transition. Schools must
protect children’s innocence, not expose them to ideologies that
normalize a serious mental illness.

The broader issue is the state overstepping into the sacred domain of
family. Public schools should not be platforms for promoting
non-traditional family structures or comprehensive sex education that
conflicts with foundational values. Materials on LGBTQ identities
often present these as normative, ignoring the traditional family
model that has sustained societies for centuries. This is not
education—it’s indoctrination. Parents, not schools, should decide
when and how to introduce such topics, ensuring their children’s
moral and emotional well-being.

A FAVORABLE SCOTUS RULING IN MAHMOUD V. TAYLOR IS A CRITICAL LIFELINE
FOR CALIFORNIANS, WHO ARE SUFFERING UNDER SEVERE PARENTAL RIGHTS
VIOLATIONS IMPOSED BY STATE LAWS LIKE THE CALIFORNIA HEALTHY YOUTH ACT
AND FAIR EDUCATION ACT. These laws force-feed children LGBTQ-related
materials in subjects like social studies and history, banning parents
from opting out. This prohibition—mandating exposure to gender and
sexual orientation topics without guaranteed notification—strips
parents of their constitutional authority to guide their children’s
upbringing. Shockingly, these policies defy the will of 80% of
Californians, who polls show oppose such curricula without parental
consent. The SCOTUS ruling could restore these fundamental rights,
ensuring parents, not the state, decide what their children are
exposed to, safeguarding their innocence and family values against
California’s overreach.

THE SUPREME COURT’S LIKELY RULING IN _MAHMOUD V. TAYLOR_ WILL BE A
VICTORY FOR PARENTAL RIGHTS, BUT CONGRESS MUST GO FURTHER.

LET’S CALL FOR A FEDERAL BAN ON COMPREHENSIVE SEX EDUCATION AND
LGBTQ NON-TRADITIONAL FAMILY MATERIALS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. These topics
belong in private homes, where parents and guardians can choose
supplemental educational materials aligned with their values. Public
classrooms must remain neutral, focusing on core academics, not
ideological agendas. Let’s protect our children’s innocence and
preserve the family’s rightful role in their upbringing.

[Defend Parental Rights]
[[link removed]]


[ACT Now: Click Here!]
[[link removed]]


 

_WE DEPEND ON YOUR SUPPORT TO DELIVER REAL RESULTS!
[[link removed]]_

_FOR THE PRICE OF A COUPLE OF CUPS OF COFFEE A MONTH, BECOME A MONTHLY
MEMBER AND RECEIVE A FREE COPY OF MY NY TIMES BESTSELLER, ‘BECAUSE
THEY HATE,’ WHILE SUPPLIES LAST.
[[link removed]]_

_SUPPORT THIS ISSUE WITH A ONE-TIME, TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION TO HELP
US CONCENTRATE ON THIS CRUCIAL ISSUE!
[[link removed]]_

_THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND PARTICIPATION,_

_BRIGITTE GABRIEL_

 

[Contribute]
[[link removed]]


_ACT for America Education, a 501(c)(3) organization._
_All donations are tax-deductible._

1083 Independence Blvd, STE 806
Virginia Beach, VA 23455 USA

Contribute
[[link removed]]
| Charity Navigator
[[link removed]]
| Unsubscribe
[[link removed]]
 

[Share]
[FB]
[[link removed]]
[TW]
[[link removed]]
[IN]
[[link removed]]
[LI]
[[link removed]]
[YT]
[[link removed]]
[RU]
[[link removed]]
[CO]
[[link removed]]
[Browser]
[[link removed]]