From Institute for Justice <[email protected]>
Subject Liberty & Law: IJ challenges sweeping financial surveillance
Date April 16, 2025 7:35 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Plus new video on the power and promise of the 14th Amendment. | View in browser ([link removed] )

Institute for Justice updates

Border-Cash-Esperanza-2-1280x720 ([link removed] )

Fourth Amendment

Border Businesses Facing Ruin File Suit Against Federal Cash Surveillance

Small businesses subject to new and intrusive financial surveillance that could ruin them are suing with the Institute for Justice to protect their Fourth Amendment rights and the rights of their customers. This week, the federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) implemented an order requiring certain businesses in targeted ZIP codes to report all cash transactions above $200. FinCEN is treating virtually every honest, hardworking person as a potential criminal whose name and financial information will go into a database for criminal investigators to use.

“The Founding Fathers knew the dangers of giving the government unlimited search powers and created the Fourth Amendment to protect privacy and property rights,” said IJ Attorney Betsy Sanz. “Financial privacy is an important part of that guarantee. Small businesses should not be dragooned to serve as financial surveillance agents for the government."

Read More
([link removed] )

Marc N'da ([link removed] )

Economic Liberty

Nebraska Supreme Court Rules Against Transportation Company That Sought to Bring Patients to Healthcare Facilities

The Nebraska Supreme Court ruled against IJ client Marc N’Da, the owner of a home health agency who had sought to provide non-emergency medical transportation to his customers. Marc runs a home health agency, and he has watched for years as his patients have been left stranded by the existing non-emergency medical transportation companies. So, Marc responded in the most American way possible—he decided to start his own company and provide better service. Unfortunately, Nebraska requires government permission to start such a company, and Marc's future competitors vetoed his application.

With a legal remedy now out of reach, the Institute for Justice calls upon the Nebraska Legislature to take up Marc’s cause, removing the monopoly that prevents him and others from providing these services.

Read more » ([link removed] )

Trina Martin and son Gabe ([link removed] )

Immunity & Accountability

Martin v. United States: A Legal Explainer

On April 29, 2025, IJ will argue before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Trina Martin, an innocent victim of a wrong-house raid conducted by an FBI SWAT team in Atlanta, Georgia. This case will shape the future of federal accountability. If Trina prevails, it will reaffirm that victims of intentional harms by federal employees have a path to justice. If she does not, it could embolden expansive readings of immunity and threaten public confidence in the government’s willingness to answer for preventable wrongs. We've put together an in-depth explainer on the legal issues behind the case.

Read more » ([link removed] )

WATCH: 14th Amendment: Securing Our Rights Against Tyranny ([link removed] )

Click to watch ([link removed] )

Why not use your tax refund from the government to sue the government when it violates people's rights? ([link removed] )

Receive a refund from the IRS this year? Consider a contribution to the Institute for Justice, and join our network of more than 12,000 supporters across the country who believe in the Constitution and the ideals it enshrines. We'll use your support to sue the government when it violates the rights that allow all Americans to pursue their dreams.

Donate Today
([link removed] )

IJ Podcasts

Short-Circuit-Podcast-narrow ([link removed] )

Short Circuit: Ten Years of Short Circuit

Recently, the Short Circuit staff celebrated 10 years of our inexhaustive coverage of the federal courts of appeals. We welcome Professor Eugene Volokh of Stanford University and appellate attorney Raffi Melkonian to discuss a 9th Circuit ruling on gun magazines—with a video dissent—and by far the most interesting arbitration case you've ever heard.

Listen now » ([link removed] )

Short-Circuit-Podcast-narrow ([link removed] )

Short Circuit: Humans Only in the Copyright Office

Bad news for our AI listeners. The D.C. Circuit ruled that you cannot be the “author” of a copyrighted work. Only humans get that perk. IJ's own CFO and General Counsel Dan Knepper comes by to explain this latest victory in humanity’s war against the machines.

Listen now » ([link removed] )

See All Podcasts
([link removed] )

Support Our Work

Champions for a Free and Just America

Your tax-deductible contribution helps IJ fight for Americans’ rights. IJ defends ordinary people who want to pursue their vision of the American Dream but find that the government is standing in their way. We stand with our clients no matter how long their cases take and we win nearly 75% of the time.

Donate Today
([link removed] )

Facebook ([link removed] )

X ([link removed] )

YouTube ([link removed] )

Instagram ([link removed] )

Institute for Justice, 901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900, Arlington, Virginia 22203

Unsubscribe ([link removed] )
Manage preferences ([link removed] )

© 2025

If this message was forwarded to you, you can sign up for Liberty & Law bi-weekly here ([link removed] ) .

View in browser ([link removed] )
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis