[link removed]

Dear John,

Sometimes, the greatest danger to democracy comes not from obvious villains but from those who gradually undermine its foundations while claiming to defend them. As Britain approaches a period of significant democratic peril, Reform UK presents itself as a voice for change while architecting something far more concerning: a systematic effort to dismantle the guardrails that protect British democracy.

This is not mere hyperbole. Reform UK, hovering near 30% in some polls, has reached a dangerous threshold where Britain's first-past-the-post electoral system could suddenly switch from artificially constraining its influence to artificially amplifying it. The implications of this shift demand urgent attention.

First Past the Post (FPTP) has a peculiar relationship with smaller parties that works like a switch. When a party has relatively low support - say around 15-20% of votes - FPTP acts as a barrier, making it extremely difficult for them to win seats.

But once a party's support crosses a critical threshold - around 30% - FPTP's effect can suddenly reverse. Instead of suppressing their representation, the system can start handing them significantly more power than their vote share would justify. This happens because at 30% support, a party can start winning individual constituencies outright, especially in areas where the traditional party's vote has collapsed.

This "tipping point" effect makes Reform UK's current position particularly concerning. As they approach that 30% threshold in the polls, they're nearing the level where FPTP could stop holding them back and start catapulting them forward, delivering a share of the seats in Parliament far in excess of their share of the vote.

This matters enormously because Reform UK represents something fundamentally different from traditional protest parties. Its leadership maintains deep connections with the global authoritarian movement, from Trump's inner circle to Europe's far-right networks. Their policy platform, masked in populist rhetoric about "taking back control," would effectively dismantle crucial democratic safeguards: withdrawal from the European Convention on Human Rights, restrictions on postal voting that could suppress participation, and systematic defunding of independent institutions from the BBC to the civil service.

The economic vision Reform presents is equally concerning: £150 billion in public spending cuts, wholesale deregulation, and tax policies that would primarily benefit economic elites while devastating public services. This combination - weakening democratic institutions while concentrating economic power - mirrors the playbook used by authoritarian leaders from Viktor Orbán to Vladimir Putin: create a facade of democratic legitimacy while hollowing out democracy's substance.

What makes this moment particularly dangerous is the media ecosystem amplifying Reform's message. GB News, for instance, recently mentioned Reform UK 572 times in a single month - double its coverage of the Conservative Party. This creates a feedback loop where increased coverage drives polling numbers, which in turn justify more coverage, all while lending Reform's radical proposals an air of mainstream acceptability.

Britain's democratic institutions currently show worrying signs of strain. The 2024 general election produced the most disproportionate result in British history (as mentioned above, Labour winning 63% of seats from just 34% of votes). Dark money flows through our politics via legal loopholes that remain unaddressed. Trust in democratic institutions has fallen to historic lows. These conditions create fertile ground for authoritarian populism to take root.

The solution requires understanding that Reform UK is not simply another protest movement to be waited out. It represents a sophisticated attempt to exploit the vulnerabilities in our democratic system at precisely the moment when that system is most fragile. The response must be equally sophisticated: systematic democratic renewal that addresses these vulnerabilities before they can be exploited.

This means replacing first-past-the-post with a truly representative voting system, closing the loopholes that allow dark money to corrupt our politics, and strengthening the independence of our democratic institutions. The appetite for such reform exists - a majority of political parties, representing 500 parliamentary seats, now acknowledge that FPTP damages trust in politics. Public support for proportional representation has reached historic highs.

The choice Britain faces is stark but clear. We can wait until Reform UK crosses the threshold where our broken electoral system begins amplifying rather than constraining its influence. Or we can act now to build democratic institutions robust enough to withstand the authoritarian challenge of our era.

The stakes could not be higher. As other democracies have learned too late, the time to strengthen democratic safeguards is before they are dismantled, not after. Reform UK's rise represents not just a political challenge but a fundamental test of our democratic resilience.

How we respond will determine whether Britain's democracy emerges stronger or follows the path of democratic decay we've witnessed elsewhere. Let’s make sure it’s the former.

All the very best,

Mark Kieran

Chief Executive
SUPPORT OUR WORK ([link removed])

View email in browser ([link removed])
Open Britain . Orion House . 14 Barn Hill . Stamford, PE9 2AE . United Kingdom
update your preferences ([link removed]) or unsubscribe ([link removed])