From Pacific Legal Foundation <[email protected]>
Subject Federal agencies remain defiant after Clean Water Act decision
Date December 6, 2024 8:27 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Timeless lessons from holiday classics; a golden opportunity for state legislators to reclaim their constitutional authority; and proven solutions to fix America’s housing crisis.

Here’s what’s on The Docket.

Timeless lessons on property rights and the rule of law from classic holiday specials

[link removed]

[link removed]

What sets Frosty the Snowman, Santa Claus Is Comin’ to Town, and Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer apart from the flurry of new holiday specials released each year? Why do so many Americans return to these decades-old classics?

According to PLF attorney Daniel Woislaw, “It’s more than nostalgia: These stories teach generations of Americans about how our society should—and shouldn’t—work.”

Read More

[link removed]

Discourse: Federal agencies remain defiant after Sackett

[link removed]

As it stands, the burden of determining whether the Clean Water Act (CWA) applies to your property falls on your shoulders. If you misjudge—which is easy to do, thanks to the ever-changing definition of “navigable waters”—you could face ruinous fines ($66,000+ per day) or even criminal charges.

The Supreme Court has provided clarity on the scope of the CWA in recent decisions, including Sackett v. EPA

[link removed]

, but some federal agencies remain defiant, choosing to ignore the Court’s precedent to further their own agendas. PLF’s Megan Jenkins and Charles Yates offer insight into this ongoing legal tug-of-war in Discourse magazine.

Read More

[link removed]

Time for states to REIN in unelected agencies

[link removed]



At the federal level, the Supreme Court has made significant strides in recent years to curb the power of the administrative state through decisions like Loper Bright. But at the state level, the problem persists—often with even fewer checks and balances.

As a result, PLF legal policy director Daniel Dew points out, many state legislatures “are reclaiming their constitutional authority by adopting REINS (Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny) Acts.”

Read More

[link removed]

You can’t make housing cheaper by making it more expensive...not even in California

[link removed]



[link removed]

In Healdsburg, California, and countless cities across the country, well-intentioned “inclusionary zoning” policies aim to promote housing affordability. The problem is these policies often neglect even the most basic economic principles of supply and demand—exacerbating the very problem they’re meant to help solve.



As PLF attorney David Deerson explains, these kinds of policies are also subject to serious constitutional challenges—and we’re prepared for the fight.

Read More

[link removed]

National Review: Charity shouldn’t result in handcuffs

[link removed]



[link removed]

Picnics, barbecues, and outdoor birthday parties won’t ruffle any feathers in Dayton, Ohio. But if you’re planning to gather in a public park to share food with the homeless, you’d better have the right permit—otherwise, you could end up in handcuffs.

In her latest article in National Review, PLF senior attorney Anastasia Boden explains why the City’s food-sharing permitting requirements (and others like them) actually do more harm than good—and why she’s proud to represent a Dayton-based charity organization that’s fighting back.

Read More

[link removed]

No-man’s (and no-bird’s) land

[link removed]



[link removed]

When Mike Colosi moved to Florida, he had a simple but big dream: build a beautiful home nestled within the serene, natural beauty of his newly acquired 5.07-acre property. He envisioned using only about an acre for his residence, leaving the rest untouched to preserve its natural tranquility.

But soon after starting the process, Mike faced a nearly $120,000 development fee imposed under his county’s Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The reason? The hypothetical chance that a Florida scrub-jay—a bird species unique to the state—might one day nest on his property. Now, Mike’s fighting back with a federal lawsuit and PLF has taken on his case.

Read More

[link removed]

The Right to Build: How property rights can solve the housing crisis

[link removed]



[link removed]

In the past decade, the median home price in the United States has increased by 43 percent, and the latest housing data show that America has a shortage of somewhere between 1.5 million and 6.5 million homes. Economists and researchers increasingly agree that the housing crisis stems from a lack of new construction, but land use regulations across the country are making it more difficult and more expensive to build.

Our latest Research-in-Brief by PLF’s Megan Jenkins, Daniel Dew, and Mark Miller outlines four policy reforms that would unleash the housing supply without removing local control.

Read More

[link removed]

American Habits: Four proven ways state legislatures can lead the charge on America’s housing crisis

[link removed]

The housing crisis won’t be solved overnight—that much is certain. But in a recent issue of American Habits (published by our friends at State Policy Network), PLF’s legal policy manager Kileen Lindgren and senior attorney Mark Miller outline four ideas that state legislators can adopt immediately to help turn the tides.

Read More

[link removed]

The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast: This land is their land

[link removed]



[link removed]

Why does the federal government control over 50% of the landmass in the United States west of the Rocky Mountains? Why would Idaho residents ever support a wind farm project that sends all its energy out of state? Why was the Homestead Act repealed?

Tune in below to hear PLF legal fellow Ethan Blevins on The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast for a lively discussion about the government’s management of land.

Listen

[link removed]

share thoughts on Social Media:

[link removed]



[link removed]



[link removed]



[link removed]

Copyright © 2024 Pacific Legal Foundation, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website, at an event, or on Facebook.

Support our mission

[link removed]

Our mailing address is:

Pacific Legal Foundation

555 Capitol Mall Suite 1290

Sacramento, CA 95814

If you'd like to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, visit our email preferences center.

[link removed]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis