------ Original Message from Charles Chamberlain, April 19, 2020 ------ John, On Tuesday, Trump halted funding for the World Health Organization. CNN reports the Trump administration had only delivered about half of the money allocated by Congress so far, leaving as much as $200 million dollars the WHO needs to fight the Covid-19 pandemic on hold. Speaker Pelosi said in the Washington Post on Wednesday the decision was "dangerous" and added:
She's right, of course. Fortunately, with enough grassroots support, Congress can do something about it.
Fortunately, America is not a dictatorship yet. The Constitution grants Congress the power of the purse. Congress already allocated this money and the law requires the World Health Organization receive it. That's why legal experts suggest Congress sue in court to require enforcement and force the Trump administration to follow the existing law. However, Trump is trying to use a loophole that allows for a 60 to 90 day review which would let them, based on the findings of the review, legally divert the funds into other related health programs. Traditionally, Congress would have to sign off on any change, but not all legal experts believe the sign off is required by law which is why the administration has moved forward without it in the past. In other words, Congress might not win in court. That's also why that can't be the only strategy. Another way legal experts say Congress can force the administration to deliver the rest of the allocated resources is by closing the loophole, including restrictions and specifically requiring immediate funding in the next Covid-19 bill. Here's the bottom-line: Congress should do both and more.
Trump isn't a dictator. He's a public servant whether he likes it or not. Congress can force the Trump administration to fund the World Health Organization if they fight back and don't back down. Thank you in advance for adding your name and showing the incredible grassroots support nationwide. Stay safe, stay healthy, and keeping fighting. We're all in this together. — Charles Charles Chamberlain, Chair ![]() |