UPDATE! In a House hearing yesterday, Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA) urged
   Attorney General Merrick Garland to formally request that the Supreme
   Court require Justices Alito and Thomas to recuse themselves from cases
   involving January 6 and Trump, as Rep. Jamie Raskin recently suggested in
   a New York Times [ [link removed] ]op-ed.
   A Constitutional expert, Raskin writes that the Constitution’s Due Process
   clause can be invoked to require that Alito and Thomas recuse themselves
   after their spouses hung insurrectionist flags and collaborated with
   insurrectionists.
   Garland refused to answer in the hearing, but this move can only happen if
   he and the Department of Justice initiate the process. That’s why
   thousands of PCCC members have been taking these actions:
    1. [ [link removed] ]SIGN THE PETITION: Tell Merrick Garland to formally insist that the
       7 other Supreme Court justices require that Justices Alito and Thomas
       recuse themselves from cases involving January 6 and Trump.
    2. [ [link removed] ]Call the Department of Justice and leave a voicemail for Merrick
       Garland now. (We’ll give you the phone number and a script.)
    3. [ [link removed] ]Chip in $3 to Jamie Raskin’s re-election campaign for continuing
       his ongoing heroic work to save our democracy.
   Jamie explains this way:
   "The Justice Department and Attorney General Merrick Garland can invoke
   two powerful textual authorities for this motion: the Constitution of the
   United States, specifically the due process clause, and the federal
   statute mandating judicial disqualification for questionable impartiality,
   28 U.S.C. Section 455. The Constitution has come into play in several
   recent Supreme Court decisions striking down rulings by stubborn judges in
   lower courts whose political impartiality has been reasonably questioned
   but who threw caution to the wind to hear a case anyway...
   "The recusal statute, if triggered, is not a friendly suggestion. It is
   Congress’s command, binding on the justices, just as the due process
   clause is. The Supreme Court cannot disregard this law just because it
   directly affects one or two of its justices. Ignoring it would trespass on
   the constitutional separation of powers because the justices would
   essentially be saying that they have the power to override a congressional
   command.
   "When the arguments are properly before the court, Chief Justice John
   Roberts and Associate Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Ketanji
   Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Sonia Sotomayor will have
   both a constitutional obligation and a statutory obligation to enforce
   recusal standards."
   Raskin notes that:
   "At his Senate confirmation hearing, Chief Justice Roberts assured America
   that 'Judges are like umpires.'"
   "But professional baseball would never allow an umpire to continue to
   officiate the World Series after learning that the pennant of one of the
   two teams competing was flying in the front yard of the umpire’s home. Nor
   would an umpire be allowed to call balls and strikes in a World Series
   game after the umpire’s wife tried to get the official score of a prior
   game in the series overthrown and canceled out to benefit the losing team.
   If judges are like umpires, then they should be treated like umpires, not
   team owners, team fans or players."
   Take urgent action today. The Supreme Court could rule on giving Trump
   immunity for Jan. 6 at any moment.
    1. [ [link removed] ]SIGN THE PETITION telling Merrick Garland to insist that the other
       7 justices require Alito and Thomas to recuse themselves from cases
       involving January 6 and Trump.
    2. [ [link removed] ]Call the Department of Justice.
    3. [ [link removed] ]Chip in $3 to Jamie Raskin’s re-election campaign. We need this
       brilliant constitutional scholar in Congress fighting to save our
       democracy!
   Thanks for being a bold progressive.
   -- The PCCC Team
    
    
    
Paid for by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee PAC (www.BoldProgressives.org) and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Contributions to the PCCC are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.Have you moved? Want to update your email address? Click below.
[link removed]
You can remove yourself from this mailing list at any time:
[link removed]