Will it ever end?
View this email in your browser ([link removed])
The 80 year high tax burden
Regular readers will be very familiar with the 70 year high tax burden. Since the TPA first revealed ([link removed]) the shocking stat, itâs now regularly cited in news reports and political discussions - even Keir Starmer quoted it!
Regrettably, this week weâre once again the bearer of bad news. Using data from the OBR, the TPA wonks have worked out ([link removed]) that weâre now on course for the highest tax burden in 80 years.
Despite a minor fall last year, the tax burden is due to hit an eye-watering 37.1 per cent of GDP by 2028-29. Adding insult to injury, the current parliament is set to have increased the tax burden by more than any other single parliament since 1950 as a percentage of GDP, raising it by a forecasted 3.3 percentage points. Check out the full briefing here. ([link removed])
The importance of this issue canât be understated. As our chief executive, John OâConnell, explained ([link removed]) in comments picked up by the Sun, Independent, Express, and Daily Mail ([link removed]) : âAn 80-year high tax burden will mean more misery for hard-pressed taxpayers and businesses, suffocating the economy for many years to come if action is not taken.â
With the UK emerging from recession ([link removed]) , easing the burden on households and businesses must be the number one priority for ministers. The governmentâs addiction to spending urgently needs to be brought under control. Now is the time for ministers to act and deliver the low tax, high growth economy we deserve.
Will you help us stand up for taxpayers by clicking here to donate? ([link removed])
Tax cuts for marriage?
Our head of campaigns, Elliot Keck, jumped on a hobby horse of his this week with the release of a new report by the Centre for Social Justice ([link removed]) (CSJ) calling for ministers to cut the costs of marriage for those on the lowest incomes. The research laid bare the huge marriage gap between those on high incomes and those on low incomes and the impact this has on loneliness, given married people report far lower levels of loneliness than unmarried people.
But Elliot couldnât help but agree with Talkâs Petrie Hosken argument that policies like these risk sounding preachy, making the point that we have a government that ([link removed]) âis treating its population like children, and a lot of people think âI just want them to leave me aloneââ.
[link removed]
Writing in The Critic the next day, Elliot fleshed out his views in more detail ([link removed]) , arguing that rather than handouts, ministers should ensure that the tax system doesnât punish married couples, and those with children, arguing for greater rights for couples to transfer their personal allowances, and for new personal allowances based on the number of children in a household. As he puts it: âat all ends of the income scale, marriage is not as financially worthwhile as it should be, and having children is far too expensive. One of the prime culprits is the tax system.â
TaxPayers' Alliance in the news
Board games and bureaucrats
With the borders in crisis, supposedly-tight budgets, and calls for the Home Office to be broken up, you might think civil servants in the department would be focusing on doing their jobs rather than arranging away days and jollies. Unfortunately, Home Office mandarins managed to spend ÂŁ756 on a day out playing board games ([link removed]) laid on by a vegan cafe.
Our media campaign manager, William Yarwood, didnât take too kindly to the news ([link removed]) raging to the Sun: âAs the Home Office lurches from crisis to crisis, bureaucrats are bunking off. Instead of focusing on border control, civil servants took the day off for board games.â
Diversity in parliament
Itâs well known that weâre no fans of the growing numbers of equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) roles - see our petition here ([link removed]) . So itâs fair to say we werenât too impressed when we learned that parliament is hiring EDI staff on almost ÂŁ70k a year ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
Appearing on Talk Radio, our investigations manager, Joanna Marchong, blasted: âEDI roles are eye-wateringly expensive⊠We donât even know what they do all day.â Check out Joannaâs interview here. ([link removed])
Hospital helipad
Air ambulances undoubtedly play a hugely important role in saving lives but a helipad at Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton is still unusable despite ÂŁ14 million being spent and it being 4 years late ([link removed]) .
Speaking to the Telegraph, John summed up the situation perfectly ([link removed]) : âWhile air ambulances have a vital role to play, this looks like a vanity project which hasnât been thought through. Health bosses must prioritise practical solutions, to ensure funding is spent where itâs truly needed â saving lives in emergencies.â
Blog of the week
What would the TPA have thought of the empire?
Following the release of his paper examining the costs and benefits of the British empire ([link removed]) , Dr Kristian Niemietz of the Institute of Economic Affairs guest wrote our blog this week, asking what the TPA might have had to say ([link removed]) had we been around at the time.
In his amusing but fascinating blog, Kristian observes: âThe idea that it was the Empire which made Britain rich is almost certainly false⊠if the TaxPayersâ Alliance had been around at the time, they would probably have railed against âEmpire Fat Catsâ, and how outrageous it is that hard-working taxpayers are forced to foot the bill for dubious colonial enterprises.â Heâs probably right.
Click here to read Kristianâs blog in full ([link removed])
War on Waste
MPs may be happy talking the talk when it comes to cracking down on waste, but when it comes to their own comfort, it looks like no expense should be spared ([link removed]) .
Parliament is currently offering ÂŁ150,000 to re-cover the green benches. As John told the Sun: âTaxpayers will be green around the gills at the cost of this regal refurbishment.â
Send me your examples of wasteful public sector spending (mailto:
[email protected]?subject=Wasteful%20spending)
Benjamin Elks
Grassroots Development Manager
[link removed]
============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 The TaxPayers' Alliance, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in to receiving our updates, or we have a legitimate interest to contact you about our work.
TaxPayers' Alliance is a trading name of The TaxPayers' Alliance Limited, a company incorporated in England & Wales under company registration no. 04873888 and whose registered office is at 55 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QL.
You can read our privacy notice here: [link removed]
Our mailing address is:
The TaxPayers' Alliance
55 Tufton Street
London, London SW1P 3QL
United Kingdom
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.