View this email in your browser ([link removed])
The wrong track
With the fallout from the local elections continuing and recent polling largely being realised in the results, the prospects of a Labour administration after the general election seem to be growing by the day. With that in mind, their plans for office deserve close scrutiny as they’ll potentially have a massive impact on taxpayers.

One area that came to the fore recently is their proposed renationalisation of the railways, which also featured in Labour’s 2017 and 2019 manifestos. Nobody likes to be standing on a platform waiting for a delayed train and I often wince when I see how much my monthly ticket costs. But would public ownership really make things any better?
Enter the TPA eggheads. In a new briefing note ([link removed]) , our researchers have revealed that almost 60 per cent of delays are caused by the already nationalised Network Rail. Furthermore, three of the four largest subsidies given to rail franchises in 2022-23 were handed to renationalised railway services with £697 million, £602 million and £402 million given to ScotRail, Northern and South Eastern respectively. Investment in the industry has also increased dramatically ([link removed]) since privatisation.

As our head of research, Darwin Friend, told the Daily Telegraph ([link removed]) : “The understandable frustration of commuters with the railways is being used as an excuse for evidence-free policy-making, which will likely only make matters worse, given most of the delays are caused by the nationalised Network Rail.”
Far from reviving the railways, renationalisation could well be a hammer blow. Our media campaign manager, William Yarwood, made this clear in an op-ed ([link removed]) for CapX: “In a renationalised future, the progress that has been made in the industry since the 90s will be derailed. No one wants to see the railways and its passengers be put into second class for the foreseeable future.”

While it may be popular with the public, and there are undoubtedly problems with the current system, simply demanding more intervention from the state is not the answer. Greater competition on lines would be a far better solution that doesn’t saddle taxpayers with the bill.

Can you help support TPA research by clicking here to donate? ([link removed])
TaxPayers' Alliance in the news
The worst council in England

If you’re a resident of Nottingham, you might want to look away now as the city council was this week named the worst run council in England ([link removed]) . Data from the Office for Local Government, revealed the extent of Nottingham’s failings while also naming Torridge as the best performing.
With some rays of light ([link removed]) in local government, our investigations campaign manager, Joanna Marchong, told the Times: “the worst-performing councils should look towards the best to ensure that they adopt sensible and worthwhile changes.” Quite right!
Reforming benefits

With the cost of disability and sickness benefits soaring, the TPA’s head of campaigns, Elliot Keck, appeared on Talk Radio with Petrie Hosken to discuss how the bill for taxpayers can be brought under control ([link removed]) .
[link removed]
As Elliot explained: “We’re expecting personal independence payments to double to £30 billion, 4 million people receiving these payments… If taxpayers are going to help fund your living arrangements, there should be a clear case that you need it.” Check out Elliot’s full interview here. ([link removed])
HMRC complaints

Anyone who’s had to contact HMRC will know that it’s rarely a simple process. It therefore came as little surprise to find out that the tax office is getting 600 complaints each week ([link removed]) . Over 34,000 complaints were made in 2023.
John O’Connell, our chief executive, spoke to the Telegraph, blasting: “Taxpayers are at their wits’ end with the chaotic incompetence of the taxman. HMRC has the highly sensitive responsibility of collecting taxes, yet is veering from crisis to crisis, damaging confidence in their ability to fulfil their functions.”
Blog of the week
The sickly civil service

With Britain’s ‘sick note culture’ continuing to be a hot topic, in this week’s blog ([link removed]) , TPA researcher, Jonathan Eida, has taken a look at how deep rooted that culture is in the civil service.
As Jonathan explains: “The data shows that in 2022, the public sector sickness rate was 3.6 per cent. This was the highest absence rate in the public sector since 2003 and shockingly, it was higher than any recorded year in the private sector.” The government should lead from the front and get their own house in order!

Have a read of Jonathan’s blog here ([link removed])
War on Waste
Bin collections are one of those key services residents expect from their councils but which all too often are seriously mismanaged.

Ratepayers in Uttlesford ([link removed]) have been left with a £75,000 bill after the local council failed to get its waste operator’s licence renewed and rubbish went uncollected for two weeks.

Town hall bosses need to get a grip and stamp out this kind of unacceptable waste!

Send me your examples of wasteful public sector spending (mailto:[email protected]?subject=Wasteful%20spending)

Benjamin Elks
Grassroots Development Manager

[link removed]

============================================================
** Twitter ([link removed])
** [link removed] ([link removed])
** YouTube ([link removed])
** Website ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 The TaxPayers' Alliance, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in to receiving our updates, or we have a legitimate interest to contact you about our work.



TaxPayers' Alliance is a trading name of The TaxPayers' Alliance Limited, a company incorporated in England & Wales under company registration no. 04873888 and whose registered office is at 55 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QL.



You can read our privacy notice here: [link removed]
Our mailing address is:
The TaxPayers' Alliance
55 Tufton Street
London, London SW1P 3QL
United Kingdom
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.