From Office of TX Attorney General <[email protected]>
Subject Attorney General Ken Paxton Submits Notice to Fifth Circuit Highlighting Impact of Recent SCOTUS Victory on SB 4 Litigation
Date April 17, 2024 9:32 PM
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
  Links have been removed from this email. Learn more in the FAQ.
Seal
________________________________________________________________________





*FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE*

April 17, 2024

www.texasattorneygeneral.gov




*PRESS OFFICE: (512) 463-2050*

[email protected]





?

*?*

*Attorney General Ken Paxton Submits Notice to Fifth Circuit Highlighting Impact of Recent SCOTUS Victory on SB 4 Litigation*

?

AUSTIN ? Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sent a notice of supplemental authority to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit detailing how Texas?s unanimous victory yesterday at the U.S. Supreme Court in "DeVillier v. Texas" further supports Texas?s defense of S.B.4.

?

In "DeVillier", the Supreme Court sided [ [link removed] ] with Texas and directed plaintiffs to pursue redress through existing state law ?[a]s Texas explained? rather than directly under the U.S. Constitution. Further, the Supreme Court explained that ?[c]onstitutional rights do not typically come with a built-in cause of action,? but instead ?are generally invoked defensively? absent ?an independent cause of action designed for that purpose? by Congress or by state law.

?

Here, the United States has sued Texas challenging S.B.4, even though Congress has not enacted a cause of action to allow such a suit. Texas?s notice to the Fifth Circuit accordingly explains: ?Like many cases before it, "DeVillier" rebuts the district court?s theory that the federal government can offensively enforce another constitutional provision?here, the Supremacy Clause?absent a statutory cause of action enacted by Congress.?

?

Texas? notice to the Fifth Circuit also emphasized the U.S. Supreme Court?s order [ [link removed] ] from Monday evening in "Labrador v. Poe", in which the Court stayed a pre-enforcement, facial injunction of an Idaho law similar to the injunction against Texas?s S.B. 4. In "Labrador," a majority of the Justices cast doubt on the legality of such sweeping statewide injunctions.

?

Texas?s notice explains: ?[T]he district court facially enjoined every application of S.B.4?even though it can never be enforced against Plaintiffs and without meaningful severability analysis. "Labrador "confirms such an extraordinary order raises serious federalism and separation-of-powers concerns[.]?

?

To read the notice, click here. [ [link removed] ]

?

? ?

###







Stay Connected with Office of Texas Attorney General on
Facebook [ [link removed] ]?-?Twitter [ [link removed] ]?-?Instagram [ [link removed] ]?-?Email [ [link removed] ]

?Update your subscriptions, modify your password or email address, or stop subscriptions at any time on your Subscriber Preferences Page [ [link removed] ]. You will need to use your email address to log in. If you have questions or problems with the subscription service, please visit subscriberhelp.govdelivery.com [ [link removed] ].


________________________________________________________________________

This email was sent to [email protected] using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Office of Texas Attorney General ?300 W. 15th Street?? Austin, TX?78701 GovDelivery logo [ [link removed] ]
Screenshot of the email generated on import

Message Analysis