OCTA boondoggle serves as a warning to other communities

View this email in your browser ([link removed])

Dear John,

For more than a decade, John Moorlach, director of CPC’s Center for Public Accountability, has been one of the most outspoken voices against the OC Streetcar. Moorlach voted against the proposal when he served on the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) as an Orange County Supervisor, but the board majority couldn't resist the lure of federal dollars available for what Moorlach has called the “streetcar named disaster.”

In his column ([link removed]) last year in The Epoch Times, Moorlach called the electric streetcar that is intended to service just over four miles in Santa Ana, “another sad episode where we get to observe our hard-earned tax dollars being squandered.”

Read on for the latest update on the ill-fated project from longtime CPC ally Marc Joffe.


** Orange County’s streetcar struggles
------------------------------------------------------------
Although California High-Speed Rail is unlikely to ever reach Anaheim’s overbuilt ([link removed]) ARTIC station, Orange County nonetheless has its own rail boondoggle: the OC Streetcar. Like high-speed rail, the streetcar is behind schedule, overbudget, and unlikely to provide the benefits project sponsors promised.

When first presented to the federal government, the 4.15-mile streetcar line was expected ([link removed]) to cost $289 million. The latest cost estimate of $579 million ([link removed]) may still be revised upward now that the Orange County Transportation Authority has further extended ([link removed]) contracts with two of its engineering consulting firms.

The project was originally expected to finish in 2021, but that was pushed back to 2024 and now to late 2025. According to an OCTA spokesperson, “identifying the location of old utilities in city streets, contaminated soil and the discovery of Native American remains” contributed to the delays.

Although construction is 85 percent complete and the track has been fully laid, testing has yet to begin. Experience with previous transit projects around the U.S. shows that problems identified during testing can take years to resolve, so, even today, the inception of revenue service next year is still not a sure thing.

Litigation between OCTA and its prime contractor for the streetcar project, Walsh Construction Company, also raises questions about final costs and completion time. As the Register reported ([link removed]) in March 2022, Walsh alleged that “OCTA didn’t provide finished or adequate plans and specifications for the project.”

The case continues with Walsh Construction filing a new motion earlier this month and a jury trial scheduled for next February. Meanwhile, Walsh Construction continues to work on the project despite its “quality issues, limited deployment of labor resources, and inaccurate schedule reporting” as alleged ([link removed]) by OCTA staff.

Whenever the project finally goes into service, it is unlikely to carry the 7,300 daily riders OCTA projected when seeking federal funding. As with most ambitious transit projects, the initial ridership estimate was likely optimistic, but, in any event, post-pandemic travel pattern changes will have an effect as well.

The OC Streetcar terminates in Santa Ana at the city’s Metrolink station, and commuters using Metrolink can be expected to supply a large proportion of the Streetcar’s riders. But, as with most systems, Metrolink suffered a steep ridership loss during COVID from which it has only partially recovered. Average weekday ridership on the regional system fell from 37,652 ([link removed]) in the December quarter of 2018 to just 22,693 ([link removed]) in the December quarter of 2023.

As a result, the OC Streetcar is likely to provide far more capacity than needed. Although each train can accommodate up to 211 passengers, a small fraction of this number can be expected to be on board at any given time.

Because trains will only run once every 10-15 minutes and the 4.15-mile line includes ten station stops, the streetcar may not save potential riders much time compared to walking, biking, or using an app-based rideshare vehicle.

While a streetcar was not the right solution for downtown Santa Ana and should be avoided by other mid-sized California cities, it is worth considering whether these cities can provide viable options to walking and driving.

Given more realistic ridership projections, it should have been clear that a bus line would have been adequate for the OC Streetcar’s route. Such a bus service could have included elements of “bus rapid transit” such as dedicated lanes, level boarding, and signal priority. As technology improves, it should be possible to safely run autonomous buses on such a route, creating the opportunity to provide very frequent service without excessive labor costs.

Another option is “micromobility” consisting of shared bikes, e-bikes and e-scooters. Users can rent these vehicles with a smartphone app or credit card at docking stations located around the city. While these vehicles can pose challenges on sidewalks and in traffic lanes, they’re a great fit for dedicated lanes that might otherwise be reserved for streetcars.

With the OC Streetcar nearing completion, there is no turning back. But cities and counties elsewhere in Southern California should learn the lessons of this costly, lengthy project and find more affordable mobility alternatives.

— This op-ed by Marc Joffe was originally published by T ([link removed]) he Orange County Register ([link removed]) . Joffe is a federalism and state policy analyst at the Cato Institute, and previously served as CPC's Director of Policy Research.
SUPPORT CPC ([link removed])
Upcoming Events ()
[link removed]

Can a public official block comments on their social media pages? When is an official's actions on social media considered private action versus state action?

Join us for CLEO's virtual event, Social Media Use for Public Officials, on Wednesday, April 24, 2024 from 12:00-1:00pm. California Policy Center attorney Julie Hamill will provide an overview of the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Lindke v. Freed.

In Lindke, the Court evaluated the question of when social media use crosses the line from private action to state action, for which a public official can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (“Section 1983”). Hamill will review the two-part test established by SCOTUS to determine whether a public official who prevents someone from commenting on the official’s social media page engages in state action.

For an excellent overview of the Lindke decision as well as the related case O'Connor-Ratcliff v Garnier, read Hamill's explainer ([link removed]) here ([link removed]) .

Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Time: 12:00-1:00pm
Register for the Zoom Link ([link removed])
[link removed]
Join our friends at PERK for an exclusive pre-release event for Tulsi Gabbard's new book, For Love of Country: Leave the Democrat Party Behind. PERK is featuring Tulsi as their Keynote Speaker on Saturday, April 27 at 5:30pm at a private venue in Los Angeles. For more information go to: [link removed] ([link removed] )

New Podcast ()
[link removed]


** Radio Free California #326: Gavin Newsom Gets Hit by His Own Pitch
------------------------------------------------------------
On this week's podcast with CPC president Will Swaim and CPC board member David Bahnsen: Beset by a historic state budget deficit, Gov. Gavin Newsom is brushing back reports that he lied about his college baseball career in order to mask his privilege. In other news, California slides to No. 6 among the world’s economies but remains No. 1 for worst unemployment in the nation. Listen now. ([link removed])

More from CPC ()


** Baby Bumps and Teacher Benefits: Dispelling CTA Myths about Maternity Leave
------------------------------------------------------------

The California Teachers Association's current social media campaign demands "Pregnancy Leave for Educators: The Time is Now!" But maternity leave has been legally protected since 1993. Find out what benefits public school educators already have, and what CTA is really asking for in the latest article ([link removed]) by CPC Research Manager Sheridan Swanson.


** California’s Unplanned Obsolescence
------------------------------------------------------------

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the California Dept. of Transportation (Caltrans) are prime examples of the counterproductive bureaucracy state leaders refuse to address. The cost of CEQA compliance is so high that many projects are not built. Caltrans is not producing the roads Californians are paying for. CPC's Lance Christensen examines both behemoths in his recent column in The Epoch Times ([link removed]) . ([link removed])
SUPPORT CPC ([link removed])

============================================================

ABOUT THE CALIFORNIA POLICY CENTER

The California Policy Center promotes prosperity for all Californians through limited government and individual liberty.

Learn more at ** CaliforniaPolicyCenter.org ([link removed])
.
** Twitter ([link removed])
** Facebook ([link removed])
** Instagram ([link removed])
Copyright © 2024 California Policy Center, All rights reserved.
We send periodic updates to those who opted in on californiapolicycenter.org

Our mailing address is:
California Policy Center
18002 Irvine Blvd Ste 108
Tustin, CA 92780-3321
USA
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can ** update your preferences ([link removed])
or ** unsubscribe from this list ([link removed])
.
Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
[link removed]