As the deadline to submit articles for this year's Journal of Academic Freedom approaches, we want to remind you about the journal's call for papers. Submissions are due by Tuesday, March 5 (although the editors will consider granting extensions on a case-by-case basis), and the new volume is scheduled for publication in late October. If you missed last year's volume, you can find it, along with other outstanding articles from our archive, on the AAUP website.

Call for Papers: "Truth-Telling versus Propaganda—Exposing the Rift"

The 2024 volume of the Journal of Academic Freedom seeks submissions that build on the themes of the previous two volumes to collectively and iteratively advance understandings and analyses of the salience of academic freedom not only to higher education but also to democracy, social justice, international cooperation, and global problem-solving. Attacks on informed speech and academic freedom, discussed in the 2022 and 2023 volumes, also correspond to attacks on other forms of societal freedom and openness, such as the independence of the press and access to voting. Despite improvements in the protection and adjudication of academic freedom during the twentieth century, recent data, including assessments from the 2023 Academic Freedom Index, indicate a decline in academic freedom worldwide, affecting not just authoritarian regimes but also some liberal democracies like the United States.

Compounded by the rise of illiberal movements, social media platforms, and the partisan ownership and control of mass media corporations, misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda increasingly mar public discourse. Artificial intelligence will bring more challenges to the arbiters and institutions that fortify informed speech in the public sphere. Higher education is at the center of these societal rifts between truth-telling and propaganda. As disinformation and misinformation are routinely deployed by authoritarian actors on subnational, national, and international stages, these propagandistic initiatives foment hostilities and destabilize public spheres in more open and inclusive societies while quelling inquiry and dissent in authoritarian spaces. Authoritarian attacks on democracy and public truth-telling run parallel to attacks on academic freedom.

New media technologies such as deepfakes deliver contemporary propaganda that masquerades as informed speech to manufacture, suppress, or deny factual, inclusive, and validated claims. The overwhelming presence of these technologies poses key questions to the critical methods and discourses of academic knowledge production. Who will train future generations to distinguish legitimate truth-telling from fake news, alternative facts, and the vast streams of misinformation and disinformation? Higher education is a clearinghouse for adjudicating truth claims, and academic freedom is the ethical commitment that ensures its integrity. From the peddling of conspiracy theories to the approval of far-right, nonacademic content for public school curricula, the rift is widening between propagandistic, faith-based assertions or partisan opinions and informed, well-reasoned, and externally vetted truth claims. Naming this rift, and identifying the propagandists who put power and ideology over sincerity and authenticity, is a necessary act in the history of truth-telling—and a defense against threats to democracy and a more free, open, and inclusive public sphere.

Although we invite any submission relevant to the journal’s core focus on academic freedom, we will give priority to articles that address any of the following topics:

Academic freedom’s integral role in the disciplined work of scientific discovery, creative ingenuity, and the enduring quest for truth
Academic freedom as a necessary framework for discerning propaganda
Misinformation and propaganda that target higher education
The AAUP’s mission and track record as an organization devoted to the preservation of integrity in modern academia
Examinations of the international Academic Freedom Index to consider the global trajectories of authoritarian movements and aggregate declines in measures of academic freedom
Parallels between assaults on academic freedom and assaults on freedom of the press, including those documented by the World Press Freedom Index
Case studies or comparative discussions of international associations concerned with academic freedom, such as Scholars at Risk, whose Academic Freedom Monitoring Project could serve as a potential resource
Donor impacts on academic freedom
Issues of academic integrity in the face of financial disinvestment or disinformation and propaganda
Current examples of debates over truth and propaganda amid the fog of war—for example, in Ukraine or the Middle East
Attacks on gender and sexuality studies as attacks on academic freedom
Artificial intelligence, academic freedom, and the long-lasting but evolving debate over forgery and truth

Submissions of 2,000–5,000 words (including any notes and references) are due by March 5, 2024. Complete submission guidelines and instructions, our editorial policy, and links to past volumes of the journal are available at https://www.aaup.org/CFP.