Election Interference Scheme Falls Flat Again  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Massachusetts Supreme Court Upholds Trump Ballot Eligibility

Election Interference Scheme Falls Flat Again

Act for America
Jan 30
 
READ IN APP
 

In a recent decision, Massachusetts Supreme Court Justice Frank Gaziano rejected a petition aiming to prevent former President Donald Trump from appearing on the Republican primary ballot in 2024. The challenge, brought by a civil rights group and a local law firm, argued that Trump's candidacy violated a constitutional clause disqualifying individuals who have "engaged in insurrection or rebellion." However, Trump has not been charged or indicted for insurrection.

The petition followed a rejection by the Massachusetts State Ballot Law Commission, which cited the 14th Amendment as the basis for allowing Trump's candidacy. The 14th Amendment disqualifies public officials engaged in insurrection or rebellion from holding public office.  

Similar challenges are ongoing in other states, including Maine and Colorado. In Maine, the Superior Court ordered Trump back on the ballot while awaiting a US Supreme Court decision. Trump has appealed the decision by the Colorado Supreme Court to bar him from the 2024 ballot, asserting that these challenges undermine the constitutional requirements for presidential eligibility.

It is crucial to note that the U.S. Constitution outlines three primary requirements for individuals seeking the presidency: being a natural-born citizen of the United States, attaining a minimum age of 35 years, and having been a resident of the United States for at least 14 years. These constitutional criteria form the basis for evaluating the eligibility of any candidate, and legal challenges must align with these established standards rather than speculative claims of insurrection or rebellion, which, in Trump's case, have not led to formal charges. As these legal disputes unfold in various states, the focus remains on upholding the constitutional prerequisites for presidential candidates.

Special Offer:

Stand by us today with a donation of $35, $50, $100, or more, and receive a free autographed copy of my most recent bestselling book “Rise: In Defense of Judeo-Christian Values and Freedom”, while supplies last!


Tired of the rhetoric, we rise with purpose and act with conviction. Subscribe today!

For the price of a $5 cup of coffee a month, you can help us stop the Marxist march into oblivion! It takes a lot of manpower to produce the change that’s needed.

Act for America is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid

You're currently a free subscriber to Act for America. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

 
Like
Comment
Restack
 

© 2024 Act for America Education
© 2023 Act for America Education, Mail a Contribution to ACT for America Education, Inc.
1083 Independence Blvd., STE 806, Virginia Beach, VA 23455 USA
Unsubscribe

Get the appStart writing